/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q25E Show how a \(10 \times (1 - \alp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Show how a \(10 \times (1 - \alpha ){\rm{\% }} + Cl\) for \({\alpha _i} - {\alpha _i}\)can be obtained. Then compute a 95% interval for \({\alpha _2} - {\alpha _3}\)using the data from Exercise 19. (Hint: With \({\alpha _2} - {\alpha _3}\)the result of Exercise 24(a) indicates how to obtain \(\hat \theta \). Then compute \(V(\hat \theta )\)and\(\sigma _{\dot \theta }^{}\), and obtain an estimate of \(\sigma _{\dot \theta }^{}\)by using \(\sqrt {{\rm{MSE}}} \) to estimate a (which identifies the appropriate number of df).)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Obtain \(\hat \theta \), find its variance and obtain the Cl.

Step by step solution

01

Compute interval

Donate with\(\theta \)

\(\theta = {\alpha _i} - \alpha _i^\prime \)

Estimator of \({\alpha _i}\) is \({\bar X_{i \ldots }} - {\bar X_ \ldots }\)and of \({\bar X_{i' \ldots }} - {\bar X_ \ldots }\)thus, the estimator of the \(\theta \)is

\(\hat \theta = {\bar X_{i..}} - {\bar X_{i' \ldots }}\)

The following holds

For\(i \ne i'\), random variables \({\bar X_{i' \ldots }}\)and $\\({\bar X_{i' \ldots }}\)are independent for every j and every k. Because of the independence, the variance of the estimator is

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{V(\hat \theta ) = V\left( {{{\bar X}_{i..}} - {{\bar X}_{i'..}}} \right) = V\left( {{{\bar X}_{i..}}} \right) + V\left( {{{\bar X}_{i'..}}} \right)}\\{ = \frac{{{\sigma ^2}}}{{JK}} + \frac{{{\sigma ^2}}}{{JK}} = \frac{{2{\sigma ^2}}}{{JK}}}\end{aligned}\)

Remember that

and the variance of the error is

which indicates that

and the fact that

The estimator of the variance is the mean square error (MSE); thus, the estimator of the standard deviation required to compute the confidence interval, is

\({\hat \sigma _{\hat \theta }} = \sqrt {\frac{{2 \cdot MSE}}{{JK}}} \)

The random variable has student distribution with I J(K-1) degrees of freedom. The confidence interval now becomes

\({\bar x_{{i_{..}}}} - {\bar x_{i' \ldots \pm }} \pm {t_{\alpha /2,IJ(K - 1)}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{2 \cdot MSE}}{{JK}}} \)

There is not enough data in the exercise 19 to compute the confidence interval. However, the data obtained in the mentioned exercise is

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{I = 3;J = 6;K = 2}\\{MSE = 18.99}\end{aligned}\)

The estimates of \(\alpha _i^{}\)and \(\alpha _i^\prime \) usually can be easily computed from the data. The values of \({t_{\alpha /2,I.J}}(K - 1)\) can be found in the appendix of the table.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article 鈥淎n Assessment of the Effects of Treatment, Time, and Heat on the Removal of Erasable Pen Marks from Cotton and Cotton/Polyester Blend Fabrics (J. of Testing and Eval., 1991: 394鈥397) reports the following sums of squares for the response variable degree of removal of marks:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}SSA = 39.171,SSB = .665,SSC = 21.508, SSAB 51.432,SSAC = 15.953,SSBC = 1.382,\\SSABC = 9.016, and SSE = 115.820\end{aligned}\)Four different laundry treatments, three different types of pen, and six different fabrics were used in the experiment, and there were three observations for each treatment-pen-fabric combination. Perform an analysis of variance using \(\alpha = .01\) for each test, and state your conclusions (assume fixed effects for all three factors).

Coal-fired power plants used in the electrical industry have gained increased public attention because of the environmental problems associated with solid wastes generated by large-scale combustion (鈥淔ly Ash Binders in Stabilization of FGD Wastes,鈥 J. of Environmental Engineering, 1998: 43鈥49). A study was conducted to analyze the influence of three factors鈥攂inder type (A), amount of water (B), and land disposal scenario (C)鈥 that affect certain leaching characteristics of solid wastes from combustion. Each factor was studied at two levels. An 23 experiment was run, and a response value EC50 (the effective concentration, in mg/L, that decreases 50% of the light in a luminescence bioassay) was measured for each combination of factor levels. The experimental data is given in the following table:

Carry out an appropriate ANOVA, and state your conclusions.

An experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of species (factor A, with I = 4) and grade (factor B, with J = 3) on breaking strength of wood specimens. One observation was made for each species鈥攇rade combination鈥攔esulting in SSA = 442.0, SSB = 428.6, and SSE = 123.4. Assume that an additive model is appropriate.

  1. Test\({H_0}:{\alpha _1} = {\alpha _2} = {\alpha _3} = {\alpha _4} = 0\)(no differences in true average strength due to species) versus Ha: at least one\({\alpha _i} \ne 0\)using a level .05 test.
  2. Test\({H_0}:{\beta _1} = {\beta _2} = {\beta _3} = 0\)(no differences in true average strength due to grade) versus Ha: at least one\({\beta _j} \ne 0\)using a level .05 test.

The water absorption of two types of mortar used to repair damaged cement was discussed in the article 鈥淧olymer Mortar Composite Matrices for Maintenance-Free, Highly Durable Ferrocement鈥 (J. of Ferrocement, 1984: 337鈥345). Specimens of ordinary cement mortar (OCM) and polymer cement mortar (PCM) were submerged for varying lengths of time (5, 9, 24, or 48 hours) and water absorption (% by weight) was recorded. With mortar type as factor A (with two levels) and submersion period as factor B (with four levels), three observations were made for each factor level combination. Data included in the article was used to compute the sums of squares, which were SSA 5 322.667, SSB 535.623, SSAB 5 8.557, and SST 5 372.113. Use this information to construct an ANOVA table. Test the appropriate hypotheses at a .05 significance level.

The accompanying data resulted from an experiment to investigate whether yield from a certain chemical process depended either on the formulation of a particular input or on mixer speed.

A statistical computer package gave \(SS(\;Form\;) = 2253.44SS(\;Speed\;) = 230.81,\quad SS(\;Form*Speed\;) = 18.58, andSSE = 71.87\;\)

a. Does there appear to be interaction between the factors?

b. Does yield appear to depend on either formulation or speed?

c. Calculate estimates of the main effects.

d. The fitted values are\({\hat x_{ijk}} = \hat \mu + {\hat \alpha _i} + {\hat \beta _j} + {\hat \gamma _{ij}}\), and the residuals are \({x_{ijk}} - {\hat x_{ij{k^*}}}\)Verify that the residuals \(are.23, - .87,.63,4.50, - 1.20, - 3.30, - 2.03,1.97.07, - 1.10, - .30,1.40,.67, - 1.23,.57, - 3.43, - .13,\;\;and 3.57.\;\)e. Construct a normal probability plot from the residuals given in part (d). Do they \({ \in _{ijk}}\;'s\;\)appear to be normally distributed?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.