/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q1E An experiment was carried out to... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

An experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of species (factor A, with I = 4) and grade (factor B, with J = 3) on breaking strength of wood specimens. One observation was made for each species鈥攇rade combination鈥攔esulting in SSA = 442.0, SSB = 428.6, and SSE = 123.4. Assume that an additive model is appropriate.

  1. Test\({H_0}:{\alpha _1} = {\alpha _2} = {\alpha _3} = {\alpha _4} = 0\)(no differences in true average strength due to species) versus Ha: at least one\({\alpha _i} \ne 0\)using a level .05 test.
  2. Test\({H_0}:{\beta _1} = {\beta _2} = {\beta _3} = 0\)(no differences in true average strength due to grade) versus Ha: at least one\({\beta _j} \ne 0\)using a level .05 test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is difference in the true average strength due to species.
  2. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there are difference in the true average strength due to grade.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the mean square values:

A)- Given:

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{SSA = 442.0}\\{SSB = 428.6}\\{SSE = 123.4}\\{I = 4}\\{J = 3}\\{\alpha = 0.05}\\{{H_0}:{\alpha _1} = {\alpha _2} = {\alpha _3} = {\alpha _4} = 0}\end{aligned}\)

The alternative hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis:

\({H_a}:{\rm{\;not all of\;}}{\alpha _i}{\rm{\;are zero\;}}\)

Determine the mean square values:

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{MSA = \frac{{SSA}}{{I - 1}} = \frac{{442.0}}{{4 - 1}} \approx 147.3333}\\{MSE = \frac{{SSE}}{{(I - 1)(J - 1)}} = \frac{{123.4}}{{(4 - 1)(3 - 1)}} \approx 20.5667}\end{aligned}\)

The F-value is the ratio of the mean square values:

\({f_A} = \frac{{MSA}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{147.3333}}{{20.5667}} \approx 7.164\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of the F-distribution table in the appendix containing the F-value in the row

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{dfn = I - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3{\rm{\;and\;}}dfd = (I - 1)(J - 1) = (4 - 1)(3 - 1) = 6{\rm{\;:\;}}}\\{0.010 < P < 0.050}\end{aligned}\)

If the P-value is less than the significance level, then reject the null hypothesis.

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow {\rm{\;Reject\;}}{H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there are difference in the true average strength due to species.

B)-

Given:

The alternative hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis:

\({H_a}:{\rm{\;not all of\;}}{\beta _i}{\rm{\;are zero\;}}\)

Determine the mean square values:

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{MSB = \frac{{SSB}}{{J - 1}} = \frac{{428.6}}{{3 - 1}} \approx 214.3}\\{MSE = \frac{{SSE}}{{(I - 1)(J - 1)}} = \frac{{123.4}}{{(4 - 1)(3 - 1)}} \approx 20.5667}\end{aligned}\)

The F-value is the ratio of the mean square values:

\({f_A} = \frac{{MSA}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{214.3}}{{20.5667}} \approx 10.420\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of the F-distribution table in the appendix containing the F-value in the row

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{dfn = J - 1 = 3 - 1 = 3{\rm{\;and\;}}dfd = (I - 1)(J - 1) = (4 - 1)(3 - 1) = 6{\rm{\;:\;}}}\\{0.010 < P < 0.050}\end{aligned}\)

If the P-value is less than the significance level, then reject the null hypothesis.

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow {\rm{\;Reject\;}}{H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there are difference in the true average strength due to species.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When factors A and B are fixed but factor C is random and the restricted model is used (see the footnote on page 438; there is a technical complication with the unrestricted model here), and EsMSEd \( = {\sigma ^2}\)

  1. Based on these expected mean squares, what F ratios \({H_0}:\sigma _{ABC}^2 = 0;{H_0}:\sigma _C^2 = 0\)\({H_{0:}}\gamma _B^{AB} = 0\;for all\;i.\;i\;and\;{H_{{a_i}}}{\alpha _1} = L = {\alpha _0} = 0?\)
  2. In an experiment to assess the effects of age, type of soil, and day of production on compressive strength of cement/soil mixtures, two ages (A), four types of soil (B), and three days (C, assumed random) were used, with L 5 2 observations made for each combination of factor levels. The resulting sums of squares were SSA 5 14,318.24, SSB 5 9656.40,

SSC 52270.22, SSAB 53408.93, SSAC 51442.58, SSBC 53096.21, SSABC 52832.72, and SSE 5 8655.60. Obtain the ANOVA table and carry out all tests using level .01. 33. Because of potential variability in aging due to different

Suppose that in the experiment described in Exercise 6 the five houses had actually been selected at random from among those of a certain age and size, so that factor B is random rather than fixed. Test \({H_0}:\sigma _B^2 = 0\) versus \({H_a}:\sigma _B^2 > 0\)using a level .01 test.

In an experiment to assess the effects of curing time (factor A ) and type of mix (factor B ) on the compressive strength of hardened cement cubes, three different curing times were used in combination with four different mixes, with three observations obtained for each of the 12 curing time-mix combinations. The resulting sums of squares were computed to be \(SSA = 30,763.0,SSB = 34,185.6,SSE = 97,436.8,\;and SST\; = 205,966.6\)

a. Construct an ANOVA table.

b. Test at level .05 the null hypothesis \({H_{0AB}}:\;all\;{\gamma _{ij}}\;'s\; = 0\) (no interaction of factors) against \({H_{0AB}}\)at least one

c. Test at level .05 the null hypothesis \({H_{0A}}:{\alpha _1} = {\alpha _2} = {\alpha _3} = 0\) (factor A main effects are absent) against \({H_{0A}}\)at least one

d. Test\({H_{0B}}:{\beta _1} = {\beta _2} = {\beta _3} = {\beta _4} = 0\;versus\;{H_{aB}}:\) at least one using a level .05 test.

e. The values of the\({\bar x_{i = \;'s }},{\bar x_{1L}} = 4010.88,{\bar x_{2L}} = 4029.10,\;and\;{\bar x_{3..}} = 3960.02\). Use Turkey鈥檚 procedure to investigate significant differences among the three curing times.

A four-factor ANOVA experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of fabric (A), type of exposure (B), level of exposure (C), and fabric direction (D) on extent of color change in exposed fabric as measured by a spectrocolorimeter. Two observations were made for each of the three fabrics, two types, three levels, and two directions, resulting in \(\begin{aligned}{l}MSA = 2207.329,MSB = 47.255,MSC = 491.783,MSD = .044,\\MSAB = 15.303,MSAC = 275.446, MSAD = .470, MSBC = 2.141, \\MSBD = .273,MSCD = .247,MSABC = 3.714,MSABD = 4.072,MSABD = 4.072,\\MSACD = .767,MSBCD = .280,MSE = .977 and MST = 93.621\end{aligned}\)

(鈥淎ccelerated Weathering of Marine Fabrics,鈥 J. Testing and Eval., 1992: 139鈥143). Assuming fixed effects for all factors, carry out an analysis of variance using \(\alpha = .01\) for all tests and summarize your conclusions.

In an automated chemical coating process, the speed with which objects on a conveyor belt are passed through a chemical spray (belt speed), the amount of chemical sprayed (spray volume), and the brand of chemical used (brand) are factors that may affect the uniformity of the coating applied. A replicated 23 experiment was conducted in an effort to increase the coating uniformity. In the following table, higher values of the response variable are associated with higher surface uniformity:

Surface Uniformity

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.