/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q15E Consider a system consisting of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Consider a system consisting of three components as pictured. The system will continue to function as long as the first component functions and either component \({\rm{2}}\) or component \({\rm{3}}\)functions. Let \({{\rm{X}}_{{\rm{1,}}}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}\), and \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{3}}}\) denote the lifetimes of components \({\rm{1}}\), \({\rm{2}}\), and \({\rm{3}}\), respectively. Suppose the \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}\) 鈥檚 are independent of one another and each \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}\) has an exponential distribution with parameter \({\rm{\lambda }}\).

a. Let \({\rm{Y}}\) denote the system lifetime. Obtain the cumulative distribution function of \({\rm{Y}}\)and differentiate to obtain the pdf. (Hint: \({{\rm{F}}_{\left( {\rm{Y}} \right)}}{\rm{P}}\left\{ {{\rm{Y}} \le {\rm{y}}} \right\}\); express the event \(\left\{ {{\rm{Y}} \le {\rm{y}}} \right\}\)in terms of unions and/or intersections of the three events \(\left\{ {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}} \le {\rm{y}}} \right\}\), \(\left\{ {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}} \le {\rm{y}}} \right\}\), and \(\left\{ {{{\rm{X}}_3} \le {\rm{y}}} \right\}\).)

b. Compute the expected system lifetime

Short Answer

Expert verified

a .The expected system lifetime \({\rm{F(y) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right){\rm{ + }}{{\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right)}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right)}^{\rm{3}}}}&{{\rm{,y > 0}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{, otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

\({\rm{f(y) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{\rm{4\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{ - 3\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}}&{{\rm{,y > 0}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{, otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

b.The expected system is \({\rm{E(Y) = }}\frac{{\rm{2}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Exponential distribution

The exponential distribution in probability theory and statistics is the probability distribution of the time between events in a Poisson point process, that is, a process in which events occur continuously and independently at a constant average rate. It's a special case of gamma distribution.

02

Obtain the cumulative distribution functiona

Random variable \({\rm{X}}\)with pdf

\({{\rm{f}}_{\rm{X}}}{\rm{(x) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{\rm{\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}}&{{\rm{,x}} \ge {\rm{0}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{,x < 0}}}\end{array}} \right.\)

With parameter, is said to have an exponential distribution \({\rm{\lambda }}\).

(a):

The exponentially distributed random variable's cumulative density function is

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\rm{F}}_{\rm{X}}}{\rm{(x) = P(X}} \le {\rm{x)}}\\{\rm{ = 1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}{\rm{,}}\;\;\;{\rm{x}} \ge {\rm{0}}\end{array}\)

The cdf of \({\rm{Y}}\)is

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{F(y) = P(Y}} \le {\rm{y)}}\\{\rm{ = P}}\left( {\left\{ {{X_1} \le y} \right\} \cup \left( {\left\{ {{X_2} \le y} \right\} \cap \left\{ {{X_3} \le y} \right\}} \right)} \right)\end{array}\)

where union represents world "or" when reading the event, and intersection represents "and". Let's find the probability now. The following holds

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{F(y) = P}}\left( {\left\{ {{X_1} \le y} \right\} \cup \left( {\left\{ {{X_2} \le y} \right\} \cap \left\{ {{X_3} \le y} \right\}} \right)} \right)}&{}&{}\\{\mathop = \limits^{(1)} P\left( {{X_1} \le y} \right) + P\left( {\left\{ {{X_2} \le y} \right\} \cap \left\{ {{X_3} \le y} \right\}} \right)}&{}&{}\\{ - P\left( {\left( {\left\{ {{X_1} \le y} \right\} \cap \left\{ {{X_2} \le y} \right\} \cap \left\{ {{X_3} \le y} \right\}} \right)} \right.}&{}&{}\\{\mathop = \limits^{(2)} \left( {1 - {e^{ - \lambda y}}} \right) + {{\left( {1 - {e^{ - \lambda y}}} \right)}^2} - {{\left( {1 - {e^{ - \lambda y}}} \right)}^3},}&{}&{y > 0}\\{{\rm{F(y) = 0,}}}&{}&{y \le 0}\end{array}\)

(1): Proposition: For every two events A and B

\({\rm{P(A}} \cup {\rm{B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A}} \cap {\rm{B)}}\)

(2) : Property of Multiplication: Two events If and only if, \({\rm{A}}\)and \({\rm{B}}\)are independent.

\(P(A \cap B){\rm{ = P(A) \times P(B)}}\)

03

Obtain the distribution function

Therefore, the cdf of \({\rm{Y}}\)

is

\({\rm{F(y) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right){\rm{ + }}{{\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right)}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right)}^{\rm{3}}}}&{{\rm{,y > 0}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{, otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

The pdf of \({\rm{Y}}\)is obtained by differentiating the cdf of \({\rm{Y}}\)as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{f(y) = }}{F^\prime }{\rm{(y)}}\\\mathop {\rm{ = }}\limits^{{\rm{(3)}}} {\rm{\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}{\rm{ + 2}}\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right)\left( {{\rm{\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right){\rm{ - 3}}{\left( {{\rm{1 - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right)^{\rm{2}}}\left( {{\rm{\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda y}}}}} \right)\end{array}\)

\(\mathop {\rm{ = }}\limits^{{\rm{(4)}}} {\rm{4\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{ - 3\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}\),

\({\rm{f(y) = 0}}\),

\({\rm{y > 0}}\)

\(y \le 0\),

(3) : rules for differentiating,

(4) : simplified.

the pdf of \(Y\)

is

Therefore , the function distribution is \({\rm{f(y) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{\rm{4\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{ - 3\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}}&{{\rm{,y > 0}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{, otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

04

Compute the expected system lifetime

(b):

With pdf \({\rm{f(x)}}\), the Expected Value (mean value) of a continuous random variable \({\rm{X}}\)is

\({\rm{E(X) = }}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{X}}}{\rm{ = }}\int_{ - \infty }^\infty x {\rm{ \times f(x)dx}}\)

As a result, the system's estimated lifetime is

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{E(Y) = }}\int_{\rm{0}}^\infty {\left( {{\rm{y \times 4 \times \lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{ - 3\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}} \right)} {\rm{dy}}\\{\rm{ = }}\int_{\rm{0}}^\infty {\rm{4}} {\rm{y \times \lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy - }}\int_{\rm{0}}^\infty {\rm{3}} {\rm{y \times \lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy}}\\{\rm{ = 4\lambda }}\underbrace {\int_{\rm{0}}^\infty {\rm{y}} {{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy}}}_{{{\rm{I}}_{\rm{1}}}}{\rm{ - 3\lambda }}\underbrace {\int_{\rm{0}}^\infty {\rm{y}} {{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy}}}_{{{\rm{I}}_{\rm{2}}}}{\rm{.}}\end{array}\)

The first integral is

\({{\rm{I}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = }}\int_{\rm{0}}^ \to {\rm{y}} {{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy = }}\left| {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{u = y}}}& \to &{{\rm{du = dy}}}\\{{\rm{dv = }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy}}}& \to &{{\rm{v = - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{2\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}}\\{{\rm{ integration by parts: }}}&{{\rm{uv}}}&{{\rm{ = }}\int {\rm{v}} {\rm{du}}}\end{array}} \right|\)

\( = \left. {{\rm{y \times }}\left( {{\rm{ - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{2\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}} \right)} \right|_0^\infty - \int_0^\infty {\left( { - \frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{2\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}} \right)} {\rm{dy}}\)

\(\mathop {\rm{ = }}\limits^{{\rm{(1)}}} {\rm{0 + }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{2\lambda }}}}{\rm{ \times }}\int_0^\infty {{e^{ - {\rm{2\lambda }}y}}} {\rm{dy}}\)

\({\rm{ = }}\left. {\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{2\lambda }}}}{\rm{ \times }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{2\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 2\lambda y}}}}} \right|_0^\infty \)

\({\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{4}}{{\rm{\lambda }}^{\rm{2}}}}}\),(1)

05

Obtain the cumulative distribution function using L’Hospital rule

here we used L'Hopital's rule to obtain the limit:

\(\mathop {\lim }\limits_{y \to \infty } \frac{{\rm{y}}}{{{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{2\lambda y}}}}}}{\rm{ = }}\mathop {\lim }\limits_{y \to \infty } \frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{c \times }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{2\lambda y}}}}}}{\rm{ = 0}}\)

When we derivative the denominator, we get \({\rm{c}}\), which is constant.

Similarly, we have the second interval.

\({{\rm{I}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = }}\int_{\rm{0}}^ \to {\rm{y}} {{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy = }}\left| {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{u = y}}}& \to &{{\rm{du = dy}}}\\{{\rm{dv = }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}{\rm{dy}}}& \to &{{\rm{v = - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}}\\{{\rm{ integration by parts: }}}&{{\rm{uv}}}&{{\rm{ = }}\int {\rm{v}} {\rm{du}}}\end{array}} \right|\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{ = }}\left. {{\rm{y \times }}\left( {{\rm{ - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{2\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}} \right)} \right|_0^\infty - \int_0^\infty {\left( { - \frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}} \right)} {\rm{dy}}\\\mathop {\rm{ = }}\limits^{{\rm{(1)}}} {\rm{0 + }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}{\rm{ \times }}\int_0^\infty {{e^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}} dy = \left. {\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}{\rm{ \times }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 3\lambda y}}}}} \right|_0^\infty \\{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{9}}{{\rm{\lambda }}^{\rm{2}}}}}\end{array}\)

(1) : here we used L'Hopital's rule to obtain the limit:

\(\mathop {\lim }\limits_{y \to \infty } \frac{{\rm{y}}}{{{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{3\lambda y}}}}}} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{y \to \infty } \frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{c \times }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{3\lambda y}}}}}}{\rm{ = 0}}\)

Finally we have

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{E(Y) = 4\lambda }}{{\rm{I}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ - 3\lambda }}{{\rm{I}}_{\rm{2}}}\\{\rm{ = 4\lambda }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{4}}{{\rm{\lambda }}^{\rm{2}}}}}{\rm{ - 3\lambda }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{9}}{{\rm{\lambda }}^{\rm{2}}}}}\\{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}{\rm{ - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}\\{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{2}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}\end{array}\)

Therefore , the expected system is\({\rm{E(Y) = }}\frac{{\rm{2}}}{{{\rm{3\lambda }}}}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A restaurant serves three fixed-price dinners costing \({\rm{12, 15and 20}}\). For a randomly selected couple dining at this restaurant, let \({\rm{X = }}\)the cost of the man鈥檚 dinner and \({\rm{Y = }}\)the cost of the woman鈥檚 dinner. The joint \({\rm{pmf's}}\) of \({\rm{X and Y }}\)is given in the following table:

a. Compute the marginal \({\rm{pmf's}}\)of \({\rm{X and Y }}\)

b. What is the probability that the man鈥檚 and the woman鈥檚 dinner cost at most \({\rm{15}}\)each?

c. Are \({\rm{X and Y }}\)independent? Justify your answer.

d. What is the expected total cost of the dinner for the two people?

e. Suppose that when a couple opens fortune cookies at the conclusion of the meal, they find the message 鈥淵ou will receive as a refund the difference between the cost of the more expensive and the less expensive meal that you have chosen.鈥 How much would the restaurant expect to refund?

Two different professors have just submitted final exams for duplication. Let \({\rm{X}}\) denote the number of typographical errors on the first professor鈥檚 exam and \({\rm{Y}}\) denote the number of such errors on the second exam. Suppose \({\rm{X}}\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{1}}}\), \({\rm{Y}}\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{2}}}\), and \({\rm{X}}\) and \({\rm{Y}}\) are independent.

a. What is the joint pmf of \({\rm{X}}\) and\({\rm{Y}}\)?

b. What is the probability that at most one error is made on both exams combined?

c. Obtain a general expression for the probability that the total number of errors in the two exams is m (where \({\rm{m}}\) is a nonnegative integer). (Hint: \({\rm{A = }}\left\{ {\left( {{\rm{x,y}}} \right){\rm{:x + y = m}}} \right\}{\rm{ = }}\left\{ {\left( {{\rm{m,0}}} \right)\left( {{\rm{m - 1,1}}} \right){\rm{,}}.....{\rm{(1,m - 1),(0,m)}}} \right\}\)Now sum the joint pmf over \({\rm{(x,y)}} \in {\rm{A}}\)and use the binomial theorem, which says that

\({\rm{P(X + Y = m)}}\mathop {\rm{ = }}\limits^{{\rm{(1)}}} {\sum\limits_{{\rm{k = 0}}}^{\rm{m}} {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\rm{m}}\\{\rm{k}}\end{array}} \right){{\rm{a}}^{\rm{k}}}{{\rm{b}}^{{\rm{m - k}}}}{\rm{ = }}\left( {{\rm{a + b}}} \right)} ^{\rm{m}}}\)

The National Health Statistics Reports dated Oct. \({\rm{22, 2008}}\), stated that for a sample size of \({\rm{277 18 - }}\)year-old American males, the sample mean waist circumference was \({\rm{86}}{\rm{.3cm}}\). A somewhat complicated method was used to estimate various population percentiles, resulting in the following values:

a. Is it plausible that the waist size distribution is at least approximately normal? Explain your reasoning. If your answer is no, conjecture the shape of the population distribution.

b. Suppose that the population mean waist size is \({\rm{85cm}}\)and that the population standard deviation is \({\rm{15cm}}\). How likely is it that a random sample of \({\rm{277}}\) individuals will result in a sample mean waist size of at least \({\rm{86}}{\rm{.3cm}}\)?

c. Referring back to (b), suppose now that the population mean waist size in \({\rm{82cm}}\).Now what is the (approximate) probability that the sample mean will be at least \({\rm{86}}{\rm{.3cm}}\)? In light of this calculation, do you think that \({\rm{82cm}}\)is a reasonable value for \({\rm{\mu }}\)?

A service station has both self-service and full-service islands. On each island, there is a single regular unleaded pump with two hoses. Let \({\rm{X}}\)denote the number of hoses being used on the self-service island at a particular time, and let\({\rm{Y}}\)denote the number of hoses on the full-service island in use at that time. The joint \({\rm{pmf}}\) of \({\rm{X}}\)and \({\rm{Y}}\) appears in the accompanying tabulation.

a. What is\({\rm{P(X = 1 and Y = 1)}}\)?

b. Compute P(X拢1}and{Y拢1)

c. Give a word description of the event , and compute the probability of this event.

d. Compute the marginal \({\rm{pmf}}\) of \({\rm{X}}\)and of \({\rm{Y}}\). Using \({{\rm{p}}_{\rm{X}}}{\rm{(x)}}\)what is P(X拢1)?

e. Are \({\rm{X}}\)and\({\rm{Y}}\)independent \({\rm{rv's}}\)? Explain

Answer the following questions:

a. Given that\({\rm{X = 1}}\), determine the conditional pmf of \({\rm{Y}}\)-i.e., \({{\rm{p}}_{{\rm{Y}}\mid {\rm{X}}}}{\rm{(0}}\mid {\rm{1),}}{{\rm{p}}_{{\rm{Y}}\mid {\rm{X}}}}{\rm{(1}}\mid {\rm{1)}}\), and\({{\rm{p}}_{{\rm{Y}}\mid {\rm{X}}}}{\rm{(2}}\mid {\rm{1)}}\).

b. Given that two houses are in use at the self-service island, what is the conditional pmf of the number of hoses in use on the full-service island?

c. Use the result of part (b) to calculate the conditional probability\({\rm{P(Y拢

1}}\mid {\rm{X = 2)}}\).

d. Given that two houses are in use at the full-service island, what is the conditional pmf of the number in use at the self-service island?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.