/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q56E Show that the relationship betwe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Show that the relationship between a general normal percentile and the corresponding z percentile is as stated in this section.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The relationship between general normal percentile and corresponding z percentile has been proved.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Concept

Probability: Probability means possibility. It is a branch of mathematics which deals with the occurrence of a random event.

02

Show the relationship between general normal percentile and corresponding z percentile

Considering the given information:

Here,\({{\rm{z}}_{{\rm{1 - p}}}}\)denotes the\({{\rm{(100p)}}^{{\rm{th}}}}\) percentile of the Normal distribution with mean\({\rm{\mu }}\) and standard deviation\({\rm{\sigma }}\).

The aim is to find that\({{\rm{(100p)}}^{{\rm{th}}}}\)percentile of the Normal distribution with mean\({\rm{\mu }}\) and standard deviation\(\sigma \) is \({\rm{\mu + }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{{{\rm{(100p)}}}^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{ for }}}\\{{\rm{ standard normal }}}\end{array}} \right){\rm{.\sigma }}\).

That is to say,

Normal distribution percentiles:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{{{\rm{(100p)}}}^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{ percentile }}}\\{{\rm{ for (\mu ,\sigma )}}}\end{array}} \right\}{\rm{ = \mu + }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{{{\rm{(100p)}}}^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{ for }}}\\{{\rm{ standard normal }}}\end{array}} \right){\rm{.\sigma }}\\{\rm{(or)}}\\\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{{{\rm{(100p)}}}^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{ percentile }}}\\{{\rm{ for (\mu ,\sigma )}}}\end{array}} \right\}{\rm{ = \mu + }}{{\rm{z}}_{{\rm{1 - p}}}}{\rm{ \times \sigma }}\end{array}\)

Proof:

\(\begin{array}{c}P\left( {X \le \mu + {z_{1 - p}}.\sigma } \right) = P\left( {X - \mu \le {z_{1 - p}}.\sigma } \right)\\ = P\left( {\frac{{X - \mu }}{\sigma } \le {z_{1 - p}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z \le {z_{1 - p}}} \right)\end{array}\)

Where\({\rm{Z = }}\frac{{{\rm{X - \mu }}}}{{\rm{\sigma }}}\)

Based on the definition,\({{\rm{z}}_{{\rm{1 - p}}}}\)denotes the\({{\rm{(100p)}}^{{\rm{th}}}}\) percentile of the Normal distribution as\({\rm{\mu + }}{{\rm{z}}_{{\rm{1 - p}}}}{\rm{ \times \sigma }}\).

Therefore, the connection between the general normal percentile and the corresponding z percentile has been established.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "'Response of \({\rm{Si}}{{\rm{C}}_{\rm{i}}}{\rm{/S}}{{\rm{i}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{\;}}{{\rm{N}}_{\rm{4}}}\) Composites Under Static and Cyclic Loading-An Experimental and Statistical Analysis" (J. of Engr. Materials and Technology, \({\rm{1997: 186 - 193}}\)) suggests that tensile strength (MPa) of composites under specified conditions can be modeled by a Weibull distribution with \({\rm{\alpha = 9}}\) and\({\rm{\beta = 180}}\).

a. Sketch a graph of the density function.

b. What is the probability that the strength of a randomly selected specimen will exceed \({\rm{175}}\)? Will be between \({\rm{150}}\) and \({\rm{175}}\)?

c. If two randomly selected specimens are chosen and their strengths are independent of one another, what is the probability that at least one has a strength between \({\rm{150}}\) and\({\rm{175}}\)?

d. What strength value separates the weakest \({\rm{10\% }}\) of all specimens from the remaining\({\rm{90\% }}\)?

The authors of the article "A Probabilistic Insulation Life Model for Combined Thermal-Electrical Stresses" (IEEE Trans. on Elect. Insulation, \({\rm{1985: 519 - 522}}\)) state that "the Weibull distribution is widely used in statistical problems relating to aging of solid insulating materials subjected to aging and stress." They propose the use of the distribution as a model for time (in hours) to failure of solid insulating specimens subjected to \({\rm{AC}}\) voltage. The values of the parameters depend on the voltage and temperature; suppose \({\rm{\alpha = 2}}{\rm{.5}}\) and \({\rm{\beta = 200}}\) (values suggested by data in the article).

a. What is the probability that a specimen's lifetime is at most \({\rm{250}}\)? Less than\({\rm{250}}\)? More than\({\rm{300}}\)?

b. What is the probability that a specimen's lifetime is between \({\rm{100}}\) and \({\rm{250}}\)?

c. What value is such that exactly \({\rm{50\% }}\) of all specimens have lifetimes exceeding that value?

Let X denote the distance \({\rm{(m)}}\) that an animal moves from its birth site to the first territorial vacancy it encounters. Suppose that for banner-tailed kangaroo rats, X has an exponential distribution with parameter \({\rm{\lambda = }}{\rm{.01386}}\) (as suggested in the article "Competition and Dispersal from Multiple Nests," Ecology, 1997: 873-883).

a. What is the probability that the distance is at most \({\rm{100\;m}}\)? At most \({\rm{200\;m}}\) ? Between 100 and\({\rm{200\;m}}\)?

b. What is the probability that distance exceeds the mean distance by more than 2 standard deviations?

c. What is the value of the median distance?

Let \({\rm{X}}\) have a Weibull distribution with the pdf from. Verify that \({\rm{\mu = \beta \Gamma (1 + 1/\alpha )}}\). (Hint: In the integral for \({\rm{E(X)}}\), make the change of variable \({\rm{y = (x/\beta }}{{\rm{)}}^{\rm{\alpha }}}\), so that \({\rm{x = \beta }}{{\rm{y}}^{{\rm{1/\alpha }}}}{\rm{.)}}\)

A consumer is trying to decide between two long-distance calling plans. The first one charges a flat rate of \({\rm{10}}\) per minute, whereas the second charges a flat rate of \({\rm{99}}\) for calls up to \({\rm{20}}\) minutes in duration and then \({\rm{10\% }}\)for each additional minute exceeding \({\rm{20}}\)(assume that calls lasting a non-integer number of minutes are charged proportionately to a whole-minute's charge). Suppose the consumer's distribution of call duration is exponential with parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\).

a. Explain intuitively how the choice of calling plan should depend on what the expected call duration is.

b. Which plan is better if expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes? \({\rm{15}}\)minutes? (Hint: Let \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) denote the cost for the first plan when call duration is \({\rm{x}}\) minutes and let \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}\)be the cost function for the second plan. Give expressions for these two cost functions, and then determine the expected cost for each plan.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.