/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q51E Chebyshev鈥檚 inequality, (see E... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Chebyshev鈥檚 inequality, (see Exercise \({\bf{44}}\) Chapter \({\bf{3}}\)), is valid for continuous as well as discrete distributions. It states that for any number k satisfying \(k \ge 1,P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) \le 1/{k^2}\) (see Exercise \({\bf{44}}\) in Chapter \({\bf{3}}\) for an interpretation). Obtain this probability in the case of a normal distribution for \({\rm{k = 1,2}}\)and 3 , and compare to the upper bound.

Short Answer

Expert verified

For k= 1,2,3, the upper bounds are 1,0.25,0.111, respectively.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

For a real-valued random variable, a normal distribution is a sort of continuous probability distribution.

02

Given Information

We begin by obtaining the general probability formula\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma )\). Since both\(k\)and\(\sigma \)as a result, we may simplify this expression to

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) = P(X - \mu \le - k\sigma ) + P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma )\)

We also know that if both sides are divided by the same positive amount, equality is unaffected.

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) = P\left( {\frac{{X - \mu }}{\sigma } \le - k} \right) + P\left( {\frac{{X - \mu }}{\sigma } \ge k} \right)\)

Standardizing gives:

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) = P(Z \le - k) + P(Z \ge k)\)

\(Z\)is a normal distribution rv cdf with a standard deviation of\(\phi (z).\)As a result, we may write

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) = \phi ( - k) + (1 - \phi (k))\)

\( = (1 - \phi (k)) + (1 - \phi (k))\)

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) = 2 \cdot (1 - \phi (k))\)

Let Z be a continuous rv with cdf as a proposition\(\phi (z)\). Then for any\(a\),

\(\begin{array}{l}P(Z \le a) = \phi (a)\\P(a \le Z) = 1 - \phi (a)\end{array}\)

03

Calculation

We may now calculate the probability using the expression of equation (l) and Appendix A-3\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma )\)for\(k = 1,2,3\)

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge \sigma ) = 2(1 - \phi (1)) = 2(1 - 0.8413) = 0.3174\)

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge 2\sigma ) = 2(1 - \phi (2)) = 2(1 - 0.9772) = 0.0456\)

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge 3\sigma ) = 2(1 - \phi (3)) = 2(1 - 0.9987) = 0.0026\)

According to Chebyshev's inequality, for any\(k\)fulfilling,\(k \ge 1\)

\(P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) \le \frac{1}{{{k^2}}}\)

The upper bounds for\(k = 1,2,3\)are

\(\begin{array}{l}P(|X - \mu | \ge \sigma ) \le 1\\P(|X - \mu | \ge 2\sigma ) \le 0.25\\P(|X - \mu | \ge 3\sigma ) \le 0.1111\end{array}\)

The probability are well within the upper ranges determined using the Chebyshev's inequality, as can be shown.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Microwave Observations of Daily Antarctic Sea-Ice Edge Expansion and Contribution Rates" (IEEE Geosci. and Remote Sensing Letters,\({\rm{2006: 54 - 58}}\)) states that "The distribution of the daily sea-ice advance/retreat from each sensor is similar and is approximately double exponential." The proposed double exponential distribution has density function \({\rm{f(x) = }}{\rm{.5\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda lel }}}}\)for\( - \yen < x < \yen \). The standard deviation is given as\({\rm{40}}{\rm{.9\;km}}\).

a. What is the value of the parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\)?

b. What is the probability that the extent of daily sea ice change is within \({\rm{1}}\) standard deviation of the mean value?

A sample of \({\rm{15}}\) female collegiate golfers was selected and the clubhead velocity (km/hr) while swinging a driver was determined for each one, resulting in the following data

The corresponding \({\rm{z}}\) percentiles are

Let \({\rm{X}}\) be a continuous \({\rm{rv}}\) with cdf

\({\rm{F(x) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{x}} \le {\rm{0}}}\\{\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{\rm{4}}}\left( {{\rm{1 + ln}}\left( {\frac{{\rm{4}}}{{\rm{x}}}} \right)} \right)}&{{\rm{0 < x}} \le {\rm{4}}}\\{\rm{1}}&{{\rm{x > 4}}}\end{array}} \right.\)

(This type of cdf is suggested in the article 鈥淰ariability in Measured Bedload Transport Rates鈥 (Water 91影视 Bull., \({\rm{1985:39 - 48}}\)) as a model for a certain hydrologic variable.) What is a. \({\rm{P(X}} \le {\rm{1)}}\)? b. \({\rm{P(1}} \le {\rm{X}} \le {\rm{3)}}\)? c. The pdf of \({\rm{X}}\)?

Nonpoint source loads are chemical masses that travel to the main stem of a river and its tributaries in flows that are distributed over relatively long stream reaches, in contrast to those that enter at well-defined and regulated points. The article 鈥淎ssessing Uncertainty in Mass Balance Calculation of River Nonpoint Source Loads鈥 (J. of Envir. Engr., \({\rm{2008: 247 - 258}}\)) suggested that for a certain time period and location, \({\rm{X = }}\)nonpoint source load of total dissolved solids could be modeled with a lognormal distribution having mean value \({\rm{10,281}}\)kg/day/km and a coefficient of variation \({\rm{CV = }}{\rm{.40(CV = }}{{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{X}}}{\rm{/}}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{X}}}{\rm{)}}{\rm{. }}\)

a. What are the mean value and standard deviation of \({\rm{In(X)}}\)?

b. What is the probability that \({\rm{X}}\) is at most \({\rm{15,000kg/day/km?}}\)

c. What is the probability that \({\rm{X}}\) exceeds its mean value, and why is this probability not \({\rm{.5}}\)?

d. Is \({\rm{17,000}}\)the \({\rm{95th}}\) percentile of the distribution?

The article "Error Distribution in Navigation"\({\rm{(J}}\). of the Institute of Navigation, \({\rm{1971: 429 442}}\)) suggests that the frequency distribution of positive errors (magnitudes of errors) is well approximated by an exponential distribution. Let \({\rm{X = }}\) the lateral position error (nautical miles), which can be either negative or positive. Suppose the pdf of \({\rm{X}}\) is

\(f(x) = (.1){e^{ - .2k1}} - 楼 < x < 楼\)

a. Sketch a graph of \({\rm{f(x)}}\) and verify that \({\rm{f(x)}}\) is a legitimate pdf (show that it integrates to\({\rm{1}}\)).

b. Obtain the cdf of \({\rm{X}}\) and sketch it.

c. Compute \(P(X拢0),P(X拢2),P( - 1拢X拢2)\), and the probability that an error of more than \({\rm{2}}\) miles is made.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.