/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q49E Consider babies born in the 鈥渘... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Consider babies born in the 鈥渘ormal鈥 range of\(37 - 43\)weeks gestational age. Extensive data support the assumption that for such babies born in the United States, birth weight is normally distributed with a mean of\(3432 g\)and a standard deviation of\(482\)g. (The article 鈥淎re Babies Normal?鈥 analyzed data from a particular year; for a sensible choice of class intervals, a histogram did not look at all normal, but after further investigations it was determined that this was due to some hospitals measuring weight in grams and others measuring to the nearest ounce and then converting to grams. A modified choice of class intervals that allowed for this gave a histogram that was well described by a normal distribution.) a. What is the probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type exceeds\(4000 g\)? Is between\(3000 and 4000 g\)? b. What is the probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type is either less than\(2000 g\)or greater than\(5000 g\)? c. What is the probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type exceeds\(7\)lb? d. How would you characterize the most extreme\(.1\% \)of all birth weights? e. If X is a random variable with a normal distribution and a is a numerical constant, then Y = X also has a normal distribution. Use this to determine the distribution of birth weight expressed in pounds (shape, mean, and standard deviation), and then recalculate the probability from part (c). How does this compare to your previous answer?

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(\begin{array}{l}(a)0.1190,\,0.6969\\(b)0.002\\(c)0.7019\\(d)Most\,extreme\,\,0.1\% \,weights\,are\,either\,less\,than\,184.4\;{\rm{g}}\,or\,morethan\,5022.6\;{\rm{g}}\\(e)Bell - shaped(normal),{\mu _Y} = 7.566,{\sigma _Y} = 1.063,P(Y > 7) = 0.7019\end{array}\)

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Standard Deviation

The standard deviation is a statistic that is calculated as the square root of the variance and measures the dispersion of a dataset relative to its mean. The standard deviation is calculated as the square root of variance by calculating the deviation of each data point from the mean.

02

Calculation for the probability in part a.

Let the birth weights of the babies be represented by an RV X then its mean and standard deviation are given as:

(a) The probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type exceeds \(4000\;{\rm{g}}\)can be represented as \(P(4000 < X)\). Standardizing gives:

\(4000 < X\)

if and only if

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{4000 - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}}\\\frac{{568}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}}\\1.18 < Z\end{array}\)

Thus

\(P(4000 < X) = P(1.18 < Z)\)

Here Z is a standard normal distribution rv with cdf \(\phi (z)\). Hence, we can write

\(P(4000 < X) = 1 - \phi (1.18)\)

To get it, \(\phi (1.18)\), we check Appendix Table A.3, from there

\(\phi (1.18) = 0.8810\)

Hence

\(\begin{array}{l}P(4000 < X) = 1 - 0.8810\\{\rm{P}}(4000 < {\rm{X}}) = 0.1190\end{array}\)

03

Calculation for the probability in part a.

Proposition: Let Z be a continuous rv with cdf \(\phi (z)\). Then for any a,

\(P(a < Z) = 1 - \phi (a)\)

The probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type is between 3000 and \(4000\;{\rm{g}}\)can be represented as \(P(3000 < X < 4000)\). Standardizing gives:

\(3000 < X < 4000\)

if and only if

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{3000 - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{4000 - 3432}}{{482}}\\\frac{{ - 432}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{568}}{{482}}\\ - 0.90 < Z < 1.18\end{array}\)

Thus

\(P(3000 < X < 4000) = P( - 0.90 < Z < 1.18)\)

Here Z is a standard normal distribution rv with cdf \(\phi (z)\). Hence, we can write

\(P(3000 < X < 4000) = \phi (1.18) - \phi ( - 0.9)\)

To get \(\phi (1.18)\)and \(\phi ( - 0.9)\), we check Appendix Table A.3, from there

\(\phi ( - 0.9) = 0.1841{\rm{ and }}\phi (1.18) = 0.8810\)

Hence

\(\begin{array}{l}P(3000 < X < 4000) = 0.8810 - 0.1841\\{\rm{P}}(3000 < {\rm{X}} < 4000) = 0.6969\end{array}\)

Proposition: Let Z be a continuous rv with cdf \(\phi (z)\). Then for any a and b with a<b,

\(P(a < Z < b) = \phi (b) - \phi (a)\)

04

Calculation for the probability in part b.

(b) The probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type either less than \(2000\;{\rm{g}}\)or greater than \(5000{\rm{g}}\)can be represented as \(P(X < 2000\,or\,X > 5000)\):

\(P(2000 < X{\rm{ or }}X > 5000) = P(X < 2000) + P(X > 5000)\)

First, we calculate \(P(X > 5000)\). Standardizing gives:

\(5000 < X\)

if and only if

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{5000 - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}}\\\frac{{1568}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}}\\3.25 < Z\end{array}\)

Thus

\(P(5000 < X) = P(3.25 < Z)\)

Here, Z is a standard normal distribution rv with cdf \(\phi (z)\). Hence, we can write

\(P(5000 < X) = 1 - \phi (3.25)\)

To get\(\phi (3.25)\), we check Appendix Table A.3, from there

\(\phi (3.25) = 0.9994\)

Hence,

\(\begin{array}{l}P(5000 < X) = 1 - 0.9994\\P(5000 < X) = 0.0006\end{array}\)

05

Calculation for the probability in part b.

Now we calculate \(P(X < 2000)\). Standardizing gives:

\(X < 2000\)

if and only if

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{2000 - 3432}}{{482}}\\\frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{ - 1432}}{{482}}\\Z < - 2.97\end{array}\)

Thus

\(\begin{array}{l}P(X < 2000) = P(Z < - 2.97)\\P(X < 2000) = \phi ( - 2.97)\\P(X < 2000) = 0.0014\end{array}\)

Using equations (1) and (2), we can write:

\(\begin{array}{l}P(2000 < X{\rm{ or }}X > 5000) = P(X < 2000) + P(X > 5000) = 0.0014 + 0.0006\\P(2000 < X{\rm{ or }}X > 5000) = 0.002\end{array}\)

Proposition: Let Z be a continuous rv with cdf \(\phi (z)\). Then for any a,

\(\begin{array}{l}P(Z < a) = \phi (a)\\P(a < Z) = 1 - \phi (a)\end{array}\)

06

Calculation for the probability in part c.

(c) First, we need to convert the units of given weight. \(7lb\)is equal to \(3175.15g\). The probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type exceeds \(7lb\) can be represented as\(P(X > 3175.15)\). Standardizing gives:

\(3175.15 < X\)

if and only if

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{3175.15 - 3432}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}}\\\frac{{ - 256.85}}{{482}} < \frac{{X - 3432}}{{482}}\\ - 0.53 < Z\end{array}\)

Thus

\(\begin{array}{c}P(3175.15 < X) = P( - 0.53 < Z)\\ = 1 - \phi ( - 0.53)\;\;\;({\rm{ check Appendix Table A}}{\rm{.3)}}\\ = 1 - 0.2981\\P(3175.15 < X) = 0.7019\end{array}\)

07

Calculation for the probability in part d.

(d) Most extreme \(0.1\% \)values are the highest \(0.05\% \)and lowest \(0.05\% \). The percentile values (z-scores) that separates them are \({Z_{0.0005}}\)and \({Z_{0.9995}}\)respectively. Which means the most extreme values are values whose z-score are greater than \({Z_{0.0005}}\)or lower than \({Z_{0.9995}}\)

If we recall, according to the definition, \({Z_\alpha }\)is the \(100{(1 - \alpha )^{{\rm{th }}}}\)percentile of the standard normal distribution.

\({Z_{0.0005}}\)means that area to the left of \({Z_{0.0005}}\)under standard normal distribution curve is \(0.9995\)

we can also say that :

\(\phi \left( {{z_{0.0005}}} \right) = 0.9995\)

Where, \(\phi (z)\)is the cdf of standard normal distributed rv Z.

We check Appendix Table A.3 to see if \(\phi (z)\)is equal to \(0.9995\)for any z. From there

\({z_{0.0005}} \approx 3.3\)

Using symmetry of standard normal distribution, we can say that:

\({z_{0.9995}} = - {z_{0.0001}} = - 3.3\)

Let \({X_{0.0005}}\)and \({X_{0.9995}}\)denote the values of rv corresponding to z-value of \({Z_{0.0005}}\)and \({Z_{0.9995}}\)respectively. Then

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{{X_{0.0005}} - 3432}}{{482}} = {Z_{0.0005}}\\\frac{{{X_{0.0005}} - 3432}}{{482}} = 3.3\\{X_{0.0005}} = 3432 + (482)(3.3)\\{X_{0.0005}} = 5022.6\end{array}\)

Similarly

\(\begin{array}{l}{X_{0.9995}} = 3432 + (482)( - 3.3)\\{X_{0.9995}} = 1841.4\end{array}\)

Hence most extreme \(0.1\% \)weights are either less than \(184.4\;{\rm{g}}\)or more than \(5022.6\;{\rm{g}}\)

08

Calculation for the probability in part e.

(e) The shape of the distribution is not affected if the random variable is multiplied or divided by a constant, hence the shape of distribution of weight expressed in pounds will be bell shaped and normally distributed. First, we recall the following proposition:

Proposition: When \(h(X) = aX + b\), then the expected value and standard deviation of \(h(X)\)satisfy the following properties:

\(\begin{array}{l}E(h(X)) = a\\E(X) + b{\sigma _{h(x)}} = a{\sigma _x}\end{array}\)

Let the birth weights of the babies expressed in pounds be represented by a rv $Y$.

\(Y = \frac{X}{{453.592}}\)

Then mean and standard deviation of $Y$ are given as:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\mu _Y} = \frac{{3432}}{{453.592}} \approx 7.566{\rm{ pounds }}\\{\sigma _Y} = 482453.592 \approx 1.063{\rm{ pounds }}\end{array}\)

09

Calculation for the probability in part e.

The probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type exceeds \(7lb\)can be represented as \(P(Y > 7)\). Standardizing gives:

\(7 < Y\)

if and only if

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{7 - 7.566}}{{1.063}} < \frac{{X - 7.566}}{{1.063}}\\\frac{{ - 0.566}}{{1.063}} < \frac{{X - 7.566}}{{1.063}}\\ - 0.53 < Z\end{array}\)

Thus

\(\begin{array}{c}P(7 < Y) = P( - 0.53 < Z)\\ = 1 - \phi ( - 0.53)\;\;\;({\rm{ check Appendix Table A}}{\rm{.3 }})\\ = 1 - 0.2981\\P(7 < Y) = 0.7019\end{array}\)

Hence the probability calculated is same as one calculated in part(c)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let X= the time between two successive arrivals at the drive-up window of a local bank. If X has an exponential distribution with \({\rm{\lambda = I}}\) (which is identical to a standard gamma distribution with \({\rm{\alpha = 1}}\) ), compute the following:

a. The expected time between two successive arrivals

b. The standard deviation of the time between successive arrivals

c. \({\rm{P(X}} \le {\rm{4)}}\)

d. \({\rm{P(2}} \le {\rm{X}} \le {\rm{5)}}\)

A system consists of five identical components connected in series as shown:

As soon as one component fails, the entire system will fail. Suppose each component has a lifetime that is exponentially distributed with \({\rm{\lambda = }}{\rm{.01}}\)and that components fail independently of one another. Define events \({{\rm{A}}_{\rm{i}}}{\rm{ = }}\) \(\{ i\) th component lasts at leastthours \({\rm{i = 1, \ldots ,5}}\), so that the \({{\rm{A}}_{\rm{t}}}{\rm{s}}\) are independent events. Let \(X = \) the time at which the system fails-that is, the shortest (minimum) lifetime among the five components.

a. The event \(\{ X \ge t\} \)is equivalent to what event involving \({{\rm{A}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{A}}_{\rm{5}}}\)?

b. Using the independence of the \({{\rm{A}}_{\rm{i}}}\)'s, compute \(P(X \ge t).\)Then obtain \(F(t) = P(X \le t)\) and the pdf of \(X\). What type of distribution does \({\rm{X}}\)have?

c. Suppose there are \(n\)components, each having exponential lifetime with parameter \({\rm{\lambda }}{\rm{.}}\)What type of distribution does \(X\)have?

Spray drift is a constant concern for pesticide applicators and agricultural producers. The inverse relationship between droplet size and drift potential is well known. The paper "Effects of\({\rm{2,4 - D}}\)Formulation and Quinclorac on Spray Droplet Size and Deposition" (Weed Technology, \({\rm{2005: 1030 - 1036}}\)) investigated the effects of herbicide formulation on spray atomization. A figure in the paper suggested the normal distribution with mean\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)and standard deviation\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)was a reasonable model for droplet size for water (the "control treatment") sprayed through a\({\rm{760ml/min}}\)nozzle.

a. What is the probability that the size of a single droplet is less than\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)? At least\({\rm{1000\mu m}}\)?

b. What is the probability that the size of a single droplet is between 1000 and\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)?

c. How would you characterize the smallest\({\rm{2\% }}\)of all droplets?

d. If the sizes of five independently selected droplets are measured, what is the probability that exactly two of them exceed\({\rm{1500\mu m}}\)?

The accompanying normal probability plot was constructed from a sample of \({\rm{30}}\) readings on tension for mesh screens behind the surface of video display tubes used in computer monitors. Does it appear plausible that the tension distribution is normal?

Chebyshev鈥檚 inequality, (see Exercise \({\bf{44}}\) Chapter \({\bf{3}}\)), is valid for continuous as well as discrete distributions. It states that for any number k satisfying \(k \ge 1,P(|X - \mu | \ge k\sigma ) \le 1/{k^2}\) (see Exercise \({\bf{44}}\) in Chapter \({\bf{3}}\) for an interpretation). Obtain this probability in the case of a normal distribution for \({\rm{k = 1,2}}\)and 3 , and compare to the upper bound.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.