Full body scan, Part I. A news article reports that "Americans have differing
views on two potentially inconvenient and invasive practices that airports
could implement to uncover potential terrorist attacks." This news piece was
based on a survey conducted among a random sample of 1,137 adults nationwide,
interviewed by telephone November \(7-10,2010,\) where one of the questions on
the survey was "Some airports are now using 'full-body' digital x-ray machines
to clectronically screen passengers in airport security lines. Do you think
these new x-ray machines should or should not be used at airports?" Below is a
summary of responses based on party affiliation.
\begin{tabular}{llccc}
& & \multicolumn{3}{c} { Party Affilation } \\
\cline { 3 - 5 } & & Republican & Democrat & Independent \\
\cline { 2 - 5 } Answer & Should & 264 & 299 & 351 \\
& Should not & 38 & 55 & 77 \\
& Don't know/No answer & 16 & 15 & 22 \\
\cline { 2 - 5 } & Total & 318 & 369 & 450
\end{tabular}
(a) Conduct an appropriate hypothesis test evaluating whether there is a
difference in the proportion of Republicans and Democrats who think the full-
body scans should be applied in airports. Assume that all relevant conditions
are met.
(b) The conclusion of the test in part (a) may be incorrect, meaning a testing
error was made. If an error was made, was it a Type I or a Type II error?
Explain.