/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 54 Rats had a choice of freeing ano... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Rats had a choice of freeing another rat or eating chocolate by themselves. Most of the rats freed the other rat and then shared the chocolate with it. The table shows the data concerning the gender of the rat in control. $$ \begin{array}{|l|r|r|} \hline & \text { Male } & \text { Female } \\ \hline \text { Freed Rat } & 17 & 6 \\ \hline \text { Did not } & 7 & 0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Can a chi-square test for homogeneity or independence be performed with this data set? Why or why not? b. Determine whether the sex of a rat influences whether or not it frees another rat using a significance level of \(0.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, a chi-square test for homogeneity or independence cannot be performed with this dataset as one of the cells count is less than 5. Therefore, we can't determine using a chi-square test whether the sex of a rat influences whether or not it frees another rat.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Applicability of the Chi-Square Test

A chi-square test for independence can only be performed if each cell in the data table has at least five observations. Checking the given table, the minimum count for both male and female rat's choices is zero, which is less than five. Therefore, the conditions for a chi-square test are not met and it cannot be performed.
02

Calculate Expected Frequencies

However, if the chi-square test were to be performed hypothetically, the first step would be to calculate the expected frequencies. The expected frequency for a cell is calculated as (row total * column total) / grand total.
03

Calculate the Chi-Square test statistic

Next, calculate the chi-square test statistic using the formula: \[chi^2 = \sum \frac {(O_i - E_i)^2} {E_i}\] where \(O_i\) is the observed frequency and \(E_i\) is the expected frequency.
04

Compare with Critical Chi-Square Value

The chi-square test statistic would then be compared to the critical chi-square value from the chi-square distribution table at the given significance level. If the calculated chi-square value is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Test for Independence
A Chi-Square Test for Independence is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant association between two categorical variables. For example, imagine you're curious if the sex of a rat affects its choice to free another rat or not. Here, the two categorical variables would be "gender of the rat" and "choice made (freed or not)."
To perform this test:
  • Ensure that your data is in the form of a contingency table, showing frequencies for each category combination.
  • Verify that the sample size is adequate, specifically, each cell in the table should have at least five observations.
  • Calculate the chi-square statistic from observed data and compare it with a critical value from the chi-square distribution table.
If the calculated chi-square statistic is larger than the critical value, it indicates that the variables are not independent, suggesting an association between them.
Expected Frequencies
Expected Frequencies are theoretical frequency counts we expect to observe if the two categorical variables are independent. Basically, they provide a benchmark to compare our observed data against. Calculating expected frequencies helps us determine if the deviation in observed data is due to chance or an actual relationship.
To compute expected frequencies:
  • Find totals for each row and column in your table.
  • Calculate the expected frequency for each cell with the formula: \[ \frac{\text{(row total) × (column total)}}{\text{grand total}} \]
Expected frequencies are a crucial component of the chi-square formula, as they provide context for understanding the differences between what is observed and what is anticipated under independence.
Statistical Significance
Statistical Significance is a critical concept in hypothesis testing. It tells us whether the findings from our data analysis are due to an effect or simply by randomness. When performing a chi-square test, statistical significance is assessed by comparing the chi-square statistic to a critical value from the chi-square distribution.
  • The level of significance, often denoted as \(\alpha\) (typically 0.05), represents the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis.
  • If the chi-square statistic exceeds the critical value at the \(\alpha = 0.05\) level, we conclude there is a significant association between the variables.
  • In the context of our rat example, if significant, we might state that the choice to free another rat is influenced by the sex of the rat.
However, keep in mind that statistical significance does not imply causal relationships, only that an association may exist.
Observed and Expected Frequencies
Observed and Expected Frequencies play a pivotal role in the chi-square test. Observed frequencies are the actual counts collected from your experiment or research. These are the frequencies you see directly in your data table, like how many male rats freed another rat versus those who didn't.
On the other hand, expected frequencies are calculated under the assumption that the variables are independent. They're the hypothesized counts based on row and column totals, as explained before.
To achieve valid results, compare these two:
  • Use the formula \[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \] to calculate the test statistic.
  • "\(O_i\)" stands for the observed frequency and "\(E_i\)" stands for the expected frequency.
A large discrepancy between observed and expected frequencies can indicate a significant association, suggesting further investigation into the nature of the relationship between the variables.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Stradivarius violins, made in the 1700 s by a man of the same name, are worth millions of dollars. They are prized by music lovers for their uniquely rich, full sound. In September 2009 , an audience of experts took part in a blind test of violins, one of which was a Stradivarius. There were four other violins (modernday instruments) made of specially treated wood. When asked to pick the Stradivarius after listening to all five violins, 39 got it right and 113 got it wrong (Time, November 23,2009 ). a. If this group were just guessing, how many people (out of the 152 ) would be expected to guess correctly? And how many would be expected to guess incorrectly? b. Calculate the observed value of the chi-square statistic showing each step of the calculation.

In 2018 Pew Research reported that \(11 \%\) of Americans do not use the Internet. Suppose in a random sample of 200 Americans, 26 reported not using the Internet. Using a chi-square test for goodness-of-fit, test the hypothesis that the proportion of Americans who do not use the Internet is different from \(11 \%\). Use a significance level of \(0.05\).

Suppose you randomly assign some parolees to check in once a week with their parole officers and others to check in once a month, and observe whether they are arrested within 6 months of starting parole.

According to a 2017 report, \(64 \%\) of college graduate in Illinois had student loans. Suppose a random sample of 80 college graduates in Illinois is selected and 48 of them had student loans. (Source: Lendedu.com) a. What is the observed frequency of college graduates in the sample who had student loans? b. What is the observed proportion of college graduates in the sample who had student loans? c. What is the expected number of college graduates in the sample to have student loans if \(64 \%\) is the correct rate? Do not round off.

Refer to the description in exercise 10.71. There were 22 trials with only cockroaches (no robots) that went under one shelter. In 16 of these 22 trials, the group chose the darker shelter, and in 6 of the 22 the group chose the lighter shelter. There were 28 trials with a mixture of real cockroaches and robots that all went under one shelter. In 11 of these trials, the group chose the darker shelter, and in 17 the group chose the lighter shelter. The robot cockroaches were programmed to choose the lighter shelter (as well as preferring groups; Halloy et al. 2007 ) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \text { All under One Shelter } \\ \hline & \text { Cockroaches Only } & \text { Robots Also } \\ \hline \text { Darker } & 16 & 11 \\ \text { Lighter } & 6 & 17 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Is the introduction of robot cockroaches associated with the type of shelter when the group went under one shelter? Assume cockroaches were randomly sampled from some meaningful population of cockroaches. a. Use the chi-square test to see whether the presence or absence of robots is associated with whether they went under the darker or the brighter shelter. Use a significance level of \(0.05\) b. Do Fisher's Exact Test with the data. If your software does not do Fisher's Exact Test, search the Internet for a Fisher's Exact Test calculator and use it. Report the p-value and your conclusion. c. Compare the \(\mathrm{p}\) -values for parts a and \(\mathrm{b}\). Which do you think is the more accurate procedure? The p-values that result from the two methods in this question are closer than the p-values in the previous question. Why do you think that is?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.