/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 According to a 2017 report, \(64... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to a 2017 report, \(64 \%\) of college graduate in Illinois had student loans. Suppose a random sample of 80 college graduates in Illinois is selected and 48 of them had student loans. (Source: Lendedu.com) a. What is the observed frequency of college graduates in the sample who had student loans? b. What is the observed proportion of college graduates in the sample who had student loans? c. What is the expected number of college graduates in the sample to have student loans if \(64 \%\) is the correct rate? Do not round off.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) The observed frequency is 48 graduates. b) The observed proportion is \(60 \% \). c) The expected frequency is 51.2 graduates.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Observed Frequency

The observed frequency of college graduates who had student loans from the sample is simply the number given in the problem statement. In this case, 48 college graduates had student loans
02

Calculate the Observed Proportion

The observed proportion is calculated by dividing the observed frequency (those who had student loans) by the total sample size. Hence, the observed proportion is \( \frac{48}{80} = 0.6\) or \(60 \%\).
03

Calculate the Expected Frequency

The expected frequency is calculated by multiplying the given rate of the graduate student loan (as a probability) by the sample size. Thus, the expected frequency is \(0.64 \times 80 = 51.2\). So, we expect approximately 51 (Tt's always better to round up when it comes to people, but the problem specifies not to round off) graduates to have student loans if the given rate is correct.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Observed Frequency
In statistics, the term 'Observed Frequency' refers to the actual count or number of occurrences of a particular event within a dataset or sample. For instance, when analyzing a group of people, the observed frequency would tell us how many individuals exhibit the characteristic or happen to fall under the category we're interested in. In the original exercise, the observed frequency was the number of college graduates in a sample who had student loans. Specifically, out of 80 college graduates, 48 had student loans. This figure, 48, is our observed frequency. It is what you can literally count or measure in your data. The clarity in recognizing the observed frequency helps ensure accurate analyses and conclusions. Being able to identify these frequencies is foundational for further computations, such as calculating proportions or comparing with expected outcomes.
Decoding Observed Proportion
The 'Observed Proportion' gives us a fraction or percentage that represents the portion of a total sample exhibiting a particular trait. It is a useful way to gauge the relative magnitude of an observed frequency against the entire group, making sizes more understandable and comparable.To determine the observed proportion, we use the formula:\[ \text{Observed Proportion} = \frac{\text{Observed Frequency}}{\text{Total Sample Size}} \]For the exercise provided, the observed proportion of college graduates with student loans is calculated by dividing the 48 graduates who took loans by the sample size of 80. This gives us:\[ \frac{48}{80} = 0.6 \text{ or } 60\% \]This percentage provides a straightforward representation of how common an event is within the sample. Observed proportions allow for easier comparisons between different datasets or samples, aiding in deeper analysis and insights.
Grasping Expected Frequency
The 'Expected Frequency' is a predicted count or estimate of the number of occurrences expected in a sample, assuming the measure like a probability is accurate. It is often calculated to compare against observed frequencies.To find the expected frequency, we multiply the total sample size by the estimated probability (proportion) of the occurrence. Using the formula:\[ \text{Expected Frequency} = \text{Probability} \times \text{Sample Size} \]In the context of our exercise, if the expected percentage of college graduates with loans is 64%, we calculate:\[ 0.64 \times 80 = 51.2 \]This means that, based on the estimated rate, about 51.2 graduates, in theory, should have student loans. It is an integral part of statistical analysis as it offers a baseline for understanding whether the observed occurrences deviate from what might be anticipated, helping identify potential anomalies or validate assumptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fill in the blank by choosing one of the options given: Chi-square goodness- of-fit tests are applicable if the data consist of (one categorical variable, two categorical variables, one numerical variable, or two numerical variables).

Fill in the blank by choosing one of the options given: Chi-square goodness- of-fit data are often summarized with (one row or one column of observed counts-but not both, or at least two rows and at least two columns of observed counts).

A penny was spun on a hard, flat surface 50 times, and the result was 15 heads and 35 tails. Using a chisquare test for goodness of fit, test the hypothesis that the coin is biased, using a \(0.05\) level of significance.

In 2018 Pew Research reported that \(11 \%\) of Americans do not use the Internet. Suppose in a random sample of 200 Americans, 26 reported not using the Internet. Using a chi-square test for goodness-of-fit, test the hypothesis that the proportion of Americans who do not use the Internet is different from \(11 \%\). Use a significance level of \(0.05\).

In a 2015 study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine, Du Toit et al. randomly assigned infants who were likely to develop a peanut allergy (as measured by having eczema, egg allergies, or both) to either consume or avoid peanuts until 60 months of age. The infants in this cohort did not previously show any preexisting sensitivity to peanut extract. The numbers in each group developing a peanut allergy by 60 months of age are shown in the following table. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & \text { Treatment Group } \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Peanut allergy at age } \\ \mathbf{6 0} \text { mos. } \end{array} & \text { Consume peanuts } & \text { Avoid peanuts } \\ \hline \text { Yes } & 5 & 37 \\ \hline \text { No } & 267 & 233 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Compare the percentages in each group that developed a peanut allergy by age 60 months. b. Test the hypothesis that treatment group and peanut allergy are associated using the chi-square statistic. Use a significance level of \(0.05\). c. Do a Fisher's Exact Test for the data with the same significance level. Report the two-tailed p-value and your conclusion. (Use technology to run the test.) d. Compare the p-valucs for parts \(\mathrm{b}\) and \(\mathrm{c}\). Which is morc accurate? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.