/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 The Burton Company manufactures ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Burton Company manufactures chainsaws at its plant in Sandusky, Ohio. The company has marketing divisions throughout the world. A Burton marketing division in Lille, France, imports 200,000 chainsaws annually from the United States. The following information is available: Suppose the United States and French tax authorities only allow transfer prices that are between the full manufacturing cost per unit of 175 dollar and a market price of 250 dollar, based on comparable imports into France. The French import duty is charged on the price at which the product is transferred into France. Any import duty paid to the French authorities is a deductible expense for calculating French income taxes. 1\. Calculate the after-tax operating income earned by the United States and French divisions from transferring 200,000 chainsaws (a) at full manufacturing cost per unit and (b) at market price of comparable imports. (Income taxes are not included in the computation of the cost-based transfer prices. 2\. Which transfer price should the Burton Company select to minimize the total of company import duties and income taxes? Remember that the transfer price must be between the full manufacturing cost per unit of 175 dollar and the market price of 250 dollar of comparable imports into France. Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In short, we calculated the after-tax operating income for both the US and French divisions based on a transfer price at the full manufacturing cost per unit (175 dollars) and at the market price of comparable imports (250 dollars). To minimize the total of company import duties and income taxes, we need to find a balance between minimizing import duties and maximizing profits for the divisions. This can be done by testing various transfer price values between 175 and 250 dollars, calculating their respective after-tax operating incomes, and identifying the transfer price that leads to the lowest combined tax burden.

Step by step solution

01

- Setting up the equations for after-tax operating income:

The first thing we need to do is lay out the equations for calculating after-tax operating income for each division. Since income taxes are not included in these equations, and import duty is deductible for French income taxes, the after-tax-operation income is as follows: US Division after-tax operating income: Operating Income = (Transfer Price - 175) * 200,000 French Division after-tax operating income: Operating Income = (250 - Transfer Price) * 200,000 - Import Duty The Import Duty can be calculated as a percentage of the transfer price: Import Duty = Transfer Price * Duty Rate
02

Calculate the after-tax operating income for each transfer price:

For Transfer Price at full manufacturing cost per unit (175 dollars): a) US Division operating income: (175 - 175) * 200,000 = 0 b) French Division operating income: (250 - 175) * 200,000 - (175 * Duty Rate) For Transfer Price at market price of comparable imports (250 dollars): a) US Division operating income: (250 - 175) * 200,000 = 75 * 200,000 b) French Division operating income: (250 - 250) * 200,000 - (250 * Duty Rate)
03

Determine the transfer price that minimizes total fees and taxes:

To answer this, we need to analyze how import duties change with the transfer price, which in turn affects the after-tax operating income for both divisions. Since the French import duty is charged on the transfer price, increasing the transfer price will result in higher import duties. However, it will also result in higher profits for the US division. The goal is to find a balance between minimizing import duties and maximizing profits. To achieve this, we should look for the transfer price that leads to the lowest combined value of import duties and income taxes for both divisions. This will be a trade-off between maximizing the US division's profit and minimizing the French division's tax expenses. Given that the transfer price must be between 175 and 250 dollars, we can now find the transfer price that minimizes total taxes and fees by testing various values, calculating the corresponding operating income, and selecting the one that leads to the lowest combined tax burden. Please note that solving this type of problem may involve using numerical or programming methods to identify the best possible value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cost-based Transfer Price
The concept of a cost-based transfer price is central to understanding intercompany transactions within a multinational corporation. In the context of the Burton Company, cost-based transfer price refers to the internal charging of goods produced by the United States division sold to the French division, based on the full manufacturing cost per unit which is \(175. This cost acts as a baseline figure and does not include a profit margin for the transferring division.

The equation for calculating the after-tax operating income at this transfer price does not consider profit for the US division, as the transfer price equals the manufacturing cost. In essence, the US division breaks even at this price, making zero profit, which is indicated by the equation:
Operating Income = (Transfer Price - 175) * 200,000 = (175 - 175) * 200,000 = \)0

For the French division, the corresponding after-tax operating income takes the market price into account, deducting the transfer price and the import duty which is based on that transfer price. The lower the transfer price within the allowed range, the lower the import duty, making a cost-based transfer price advantageous for reducing the import duty paid by the French division.
Market Price Transfer
Conversely, a market price transfer embodies the practice of setting the transfer price equal to the price at which the goods would sell in a competitive market. For Burton Company, the market price of comparable imports into France stands at \(250 per unit. This shifts the focus to the revenue potential for the US division since it allows for profit recognition over cost.

The calculation of after-tax operating income at the market price transfer for the US division clearly demonstrates that higher transfer prices benefit the division providing the goods due to the realized profit formatted as:
Operating Income = (Transfer Price - 175) * 200,000 = (250 - 175) * 200,000 = \)15 million

However, this is counterbalanced by increased import duties for the French division, since duties are directly tied to the transfer price. This creates a trade-off scenario where the selling division's profit increase results in higher costs for the buying division. This mechanism aligns the interests of separate divisions with the overall financial efficiency of the corporation.
After-Tax Operating Income
After-tax operating income is a company's profit after all operating expenses have been deducted, but before taxes have been subtracted. In the case study provided, this measure considers the impact of transfer pricing and import duties on the profitability of each division before considering income tax.

We see that by manipulating the transfer price, Burton Company can influence its after-tax operating income for both the US and French divisions. A higher transfer price inflates the US division's income, whereas a lower transfer price alleviates the tax burden for the French division by reducing import duties which are deductible. Needless to say, the optimal transfer price will balance the needs of both divisions to optimize the after-tax operating income globally. It's worth noting that in a real-world scenario, calculations would further account for applicable income taxes which could significantly alter the optimal transfer price strategy.
Import Duty Deductions
Import duty deductions are crucial in the international transfer pricing strategies of multinational companies. Within the Burton Company scenario, the import duty that the French division pays is calculated based on the internal transfer price and is a deductible expense when calculating the French income taxes.

Thus, when the transfer price is set at the full manufacturing cost, the import duty incurred by the French division will be lower, as shown by the formula:
Import Duty = Transfer Price * Duty Rate = 175 * Duty Rate

Comparatively, at a market price transfer, the import duty grows exponentially:
Import Duty = Transfer Price * Duty Rate = 250 * Duty Rate

These deductions emphasize the interplay between transfer pricing and tax liabilities, demonstrating how companies can legally maneuver within tax frameworks to minimize tax obligations. The selection of an appropriate transfer price impacts not only divisional profits but also tax planning and cash flows due to the import duties levied and their subsequent deduction from taxable income.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What properties should transfer-pricing systems have?

Quick Stop operates 1,000 convenience stores throughout the United States. The company's slogan is "Best Stop of the Day," and its mission is to make every customer a return customer. Ouick Stop's corporate strategy supports this mission by stressing the importance of sparkling clean surroundings, well- stocked shelves, and, above all, cheerful employees. \(0 f\) course, improved shareholder value drives this strategy. 1\. Assume that Quick Stop uses a balanced scorecard approach (see Chapter 12) to formulating its management control system. List three measures that Quick Stop might use to evaluate each of the four balanced scorecard perspectives: financial perspective, customer perspective, internal-business-process perspective, and learning-and-growth perspective. 2\. How would the management controls related to financial and customer perspectives at Quick Stop differ between the following three employees: a store manager, a regional sales manager, and the corporation's CE0?

What are the three methods for determining transfer prices?

\((\mathrm{CMA}, \text { adapted). }\) Quest Motors, Inc., operates as a decentralized multidivision company. The Vivo division of Quest Motors purchases most of its airbags from the airbag division. The airbag division's incremental cost for manufacturing the airbags is 90 dollarper unit. The airbag division is currently working at \(80 \%\) of capacity. The current market price of the airbags is 125 dollar per unit. 1\. Using the general guideline presented in the chapter, what is the minimum price at which the airbag division would sell airbags to the Vivo division? 2\. Suppose that Quest Motors requires that whenever divisions with unused capacity sell products internally, they must do so at the incremental cost. Evaluate this transfer-pricing policy using the criteria of goal congruence, evaluating division performance, motivating management effort, and preserving division autonomy. 3\. If the two divisions were to negotiate a transfer price, what is the range of possible transfer prices? Evaluate this negotiated transfer-pricing policy using the criteria of goal congruence, evaluating division performance, motivating management effort, and preserving division autonomy. 4\. Instead of allowing negotiation, suppose that Quest specifies a hybrid transfer price that "splits the difference" between the minimum and maximum prices from the divisions' standpoint. What would be the resulting transfer price for airbags?

Under what conditions is a market-based transfer price optimal?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.