/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 142 A case-control study was perform... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A case-control study was performed among 145 subjects with macular degeneration and 34 controls, all of whom were \(70-\) to 79 -year-old women. A genetic risk score was developed to help differentiate the cases from the controls. The risk score was categorized into six groups \((1,2,3,4,\) 5, 6), with 6 being the highest risk and 1 being the lowest risk. The data in Table 10.48 were obtained relating the risk score to case/control status. What is the relative risk for AMD among women in group 6 compared with women in group \(1 ?\) What does the relative risk mean in words?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Calculate risks and use the ratio to determine relative risk; interpret based on values.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is typically used in cohort studies to compare the risk of a certain event (such as developing a disease) occurring in two different groups. In a case-control study like this, while we primarily use odds ratios, if a risk score distribution is known, we can use it in a similar way to derive relative risks. Here, we'll calculate the risk of having age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in group 6 versus group 1.
02

Identify the Data and Risk Groups

From the description, we know that the participants are split into groups 1 to 6 based on their genetic risk score. We focus on group 6, which has the highest risk (presumably more cases), and group 1, which has the lowest risk (presumably fewer cases). Without specific counts, we'll generalize the process to calculate relative risk.
03

Determine Case and Control Numbers for Groups

In a practical setting, you would extract the number of cases and controls for the groups of interest from the data table. For example, let’s assume there are X cases in group 6 and Y controls, and A cases in group 1 with B controls. For simplicity, fair assumptions are needed if specifics aren’t given.
04

Calculate the Risk in Each Group

The risk for each group is calculated as the number of cases in the group divided by the total number of individuals (cases + controls) in that group. - Risk for group 6: \( R_6 = \frac{X}{X+Y} \)- Risk for group 1: \( R_1 = \frac{A}{A+B} \)
05

Calculate the Relative Risk

The relative risk is the ratio of the risk in group 6 to the risk in group 1. \[ RR = \frac{R_6}{R_1} = \frac{\frac{X}{X+Y}}{\frac{A}{A+B}} = \frac{X(A+B)}{A(X+Y)} \] where RR is the relative risk between the highest risk group 6 compared to the lowest risk group 1.
06

Interpret the Relative Risk

A relative risk greater than 1 indicates a higher risk of AMD in group 6 compared to group 1, whereas a relative risk less than 1 indicates a lower risk. For instance, an RR of 2 means women in group 6 have twice the risk of developing AMD compared to those in group 1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative Risk
Relative risk, often denoted as RR, is a vital concept in biostatistics, particularly when comparing the likelihood of an event occurring across different groups. While commonly applied in cohort studies, it can be adapted for case-control studies when appropriate data is available. In simple terms, relative risk measures how much more (or less) likely an outcome is in one group compared to another. For instance, if the relative risk of group 6 compared to group 1 is greater than 1, this suggests that members of group 6 are at a higher risk for the event, such as developing Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD), than those in group 1.

A key thing to remember is that relative risk provides a ratio. This means it quantifies the risk comparison between two groups. An RR of 2 means that the event is twice as likely to occur in the first group as in the second. Conversely, an RR of 0.5 signifies that the event is half as likely. Understanding relative risk helps in making informed decisions in both medical and public health contexts.
Case-Control Study
A case-control study is a research design commonly used in biostatistics and epidemiology. It is especially useful for studying rare diseases or outcomes, such as Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) in the context of genetic research. In these studies, subjects are divided into cases, who have the disease, and controls, who do not.

This type of study is retrospective, meaning it looks back in time to compare exposure levels (like risk scores or genetic predispositions) between the two groups. The goal is to determine any associations between exposure and the disease outcome. What makes case-control studies advantageous is their efficiency, particularly when dealing with rare diseases or outcomes, as it requires fewer resources than other study types.

One important factor in case-control studies is the selection of cases and controls; they need to be well-matched and representative of the general population to ensure valid results. The main measure of association derived from a case-control study is the odds ratio, but sometimes, as in this exercise, relative risk is considered, providing insights into potential causal links.
Genetic Risk Score
A genetic risk score is a single metric that summarizes the effect of multiple genetic variants on an individual's risk of developing a particular condition, such as Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). This score is calculated by assessing the presence or absence of certain genetic markers that have been linked to the disease.

The risk score used in the exercise is divided into six categories, with category 6 representing the highest genetic risk and category 1 the lowest. Each individual in the study is assigned a score based on their genetic makeup, which will affect their classification as a case or control.

The utility of a genetic risk score lies in its ability to stratify populations based on the genetic risk, offering valuable insights for both clinical research and personalized medicine. It helps researchers and clinicians to identify individuals at higher risk, allowing for targeted interventions and better disease management strategies.
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is a common eye condition that affects individuals over the age of 50 and can lead to significant vision loss. It is one of the leading causes of vision impairment in older adults. AMD specifically affects the macula, which is the central part of the retina responsible for sharp and central vision.

Despite ample research, the exact cause of AMD remains unknown, although age and genetic factors are known to play significant roles. Common symptoms include blurred vision, dark or empty areas in the center of vision, and difficulty recognizing faces.

Understanding AMD's risk factors is key to developing prevention and treatment strategies. Studies like the one in the exercise, which examine genetic risk scores alongside other factors, aim to uncover more about how these risks contribute to AMD. This knowledge could eventually lead to more tailored and effective therapeutic approaches, improving the quality of life for those affected.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Death of a patient in the hospital is a high-priority medical outcome. Some hospital deaths may be due to inadequate care and are potentially preventable. An adverse event during a hospital stay is defined as a problem of any nature and seriousness experienced by a patient during his or her stay in the hospital that is potentially attributable to clinical or administrative management rather than the underlying disease. A study in a hospital in Granada, Spain, assessed whether there was a relationship between adverse events and deaths during hospital stay \([18] .\) In this study, 524 cases (i.e., people who died in the hospital) were identified between January \(1,1990,\) and January \(1,1991 .\) For each case, a control patient was matched on admission diagnosis and admission date. A retrospective chart review determined occurrence of adverse events among all cases and controls. There were 299 adverse events occurring among the cases and 225 among the controls. Among the 299 cases in which an adverse event occurred, 126 of their corresponding matched controls also had an adverse event. What method of analysis can be used to compare the proportion of adverse events between cases and controls?

Researchers collected the following data concerning comparability of diagnoses of schizophrenia obtained from primary-care physician report as compared with proxy report (from spouses). Data were collected concerning 953 people (referred to as index subjects). The researchers found that schizophrenia was identified as present on 115 physician reports and 124 proxy reports. Both physician and proxy informants identified 34 people as positive, and they are included among the 115 and 124 individuals described. In a reproducibility study, researchers contacted the 953 spouses a second time 1 year later and asked them again whether the index subject was schizophrenic. There were 112 positive reports of schizophrenia obtained, of which 89 were positive on both first and second report. Compute an index of reproducibility for proxy report of schizophrenia based on these data, and provide an interpretation of what it means.

Acute OTM early in infancy may be an important predictor of subsequent morbidity, including psychological and educational difficulties. A study was performed among high-risk infants who had already experienced either a single episode of acute OTM prior to the age of 6 months or two or more episodes before 12 months of life [23] Children were randomized to one of three treatment groups, (a) amoxicillin (AMX), (b) sulfisoxazole (SUL), or (c) placebo (PLA), and their parents were told to administer the drug daily for a 6 -month period (even in the absence of symptoms). If children had an acute OTM episode during the study period, they received the best antibiotic care, regardless of their study-drug group. The results were as shown in Table 10.36 What test can be used to compare the percentage of children who were acute OTM-free between the AMX group and the PLA group?

A study was performed relating neonatal blood-pressure level to neonatal taste responsiveness (Zinner et al. [29]). To assess salt taste responsiveness, infants 2 to 4 days old were offered 3 solutions via nipple cannulas containing (i) water, (ii) water + 0.1 molar salt, and (iii) water + 0.3 molar salt. Infant blood pressure was measured separately with a Physiometrics machine at \(2-4\) days of age. A comparison was made between the mean number of sucks per burst of sucking (MSB) on (water + 0.3 molar salt) minus the MSB on water alone \(=\Delta\) MSB. If \(\Delta \mathrm{MSB} \leq-10,\) it was considered an aversive response; if \(\Delta \mathrm{MSB}>0\), it was considered a preferential response; otherwise, it was considered a neutral response. For the purposes of this question, the neutral response infants were eliminated and we compare the distribution of diastolic blood pressure between the aversive and preferential response infants. The results are given in Table 10.46 We wish to test whether there is an association between salt taste response and DBP quintile. State the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested to answer this question in statistical terms.

One important aspect of medical diagnosis is its reproducibility. Suppose that two different doctors examine 100 patients for dyspnea in a respiratory- disease clinic and that doctor A diagnosed 15 patients as having dyspnea, doctor B diagnosed 10 patients as having dyspnea, and both doctor \(A\) and doctor \(B\) diagnosed 7 patients as having dyspnea. Compute the Kappa statistic and its standard error regarding reproducibility of the diagnosis of dyspnea in this clinic.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.