/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 139 A case-control study was perform... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A case-control study was performed among 145 subjects with macular degeneration and 34 controls, all of whom were \(70-\) to 79 -year-old women. A genetic risk score was developed to help differentiate the cases from the controls. The risk score was categorized into six groups \((1,2,3,4,\) 5, 6), with 6 being the highest risk and 1 being the lowest risk. The data in Table 10.48 were obtained relating the risk score to case/control status. What test can be performed to study the association between case/control status and risk score? Specifically, we are interested in testing whether cases tend to have consistently higher risk scores or consistently lower risk scores than controls.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use the Mann-Whitney U test to assess the association between case/control status and risk score.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Variables

We have two main variables: the case/control status and the genetic risk score. The case/control status is dichotomous (either case or control), and the genetic risk score is ordinal, ranging from 1 to 6.
02

Identify the Hypothesis

The hypothesis is whether there is an association between the case/control status and the risk score, specifically if cases tend to have higher or lower risk scores than controls.
03

Choose the Appropriate Test

Since we're testing the association between an ordinal variable (risk score) and a dichotomous variable (case/control), we use the Mann-Whitney U test (also known as the Wilcoxon rank-sum test) to compare the distributions of risk scores between the two groups.
04

Conclusion

The Mann-Whitney U test will indicate if there is a statistically significant difference in the distributions of risk scores between cases and controls, thereby showing whether the cases have consistently higher or lower scores.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Case-Control Study
A case-control study is a type of observational study frequently used in epidemiology. It helps scientists understand causes of diseases by comparing two groups: one with the disease (cases) and one without (controls). This study design is retrospective, meaning researchers look back in time to find common exposures or risk factors.
  • The cases in our exercise have macular degeneration, while the controls do not.
  • Both groups consist of women aged 70 to 79, lending consistency to the study.
In our exercise, the main focus was to explore the connection between the genetic risk score and the presence of macular degeneration through these groups.
Ordinary Variable
In statistics, an ordinary (or ordinal) variable is one that represents data with a natural order. However, ordinal variables do not have a consistent difference between their values, unlike interval or ratio variables. A typical example of an ordinary variable is a ranking system.
  • In the exercise, the genetic risk score is an ordinal variable categorized into six levels, 1 through 6.
  • This risk score helps differentiate the severity of risk, with higher numbers indicating higher risk.
Since this score ranks the level of genetic risk, it is crucial in determining statistical tests that can assess its relationship with another variable, like case/control status.
Statistical Association
Statistical association refers to a relationship between two or more variables where changes in one variable relate to changes in another. Determining a statistical association is essential in understanding possible cause-effect connections.
  • In the context of our exercise, we want to know if a higher risk score is statistically associated with being a case (having macular degeneration) as opposed to a control.
  • Such associations are usually examined through statistical tests that evaluate if the observed patterns in the data are due to chance.
To explore this in our exercise, we use a Mann-Whitney U test. This test checks if there is a significant difference between the risk scores of cases versus controls, thus indicating whether a statistical association exists.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers collected the following data concerning comparability of diagnoses of schizophrenia obtained from primary-care physician report as compared with proxy report (from spouses). Data were collected concerning 953 people (referred to as index subjects). The researchers found that schizophrenia was identified as present on 115 physician reports and 124 proxy reports. Both physician and proxy informants identified 34 people as positive, and they are included among the 115 and 124 individuals described. In a reproducibility study, researchers contacted the 953 spouses a second time 1 year later and asked them again whether the index subject was schizophrenic. There were 112 positive reports of schizophrenia obtained, of which 89 were positive on both first and second report. Compute an index of reproducibility for proxy report of schizophrenia based on these data, and provide an interpretation of what it means.

A common assumption is that the gender distributions of successive offspring are independent. To test this assumption, birth records were collected from the first 5 births in 51,868 families. For families with exactly 5 children, Table 10.35 shows a frequency distribution of the number of male offs pring (from Data Set SEXRAT.DAT; see p. 110). Suppose the investigators doubt the probability of a male birth is exactly \(50 \%\) but are willing to assume the gender distributions of successive offspring are independent. What is the best estimate of the probability of a male offspring based on the observed data?

A topic of current interest is whether abortion is a risk factor for breast cancer. One issue is whether women who have had abortions are comparable to women who have not had abortions in terms of other breast-cancer risk factors. One of the best-known breast-cancer risk factors is parity (i.e., number of children), with parous women with many children having about a \(30 \%\) lower risk of breast cancer than nulliparous women (i.e., women with no children). Hence, it is important to assess whether the parity distributions of women with and without previous abortions are comparable. The data in Table 10.30 were obtained from the Nurses' Health Study on this issue. What test can be performed to compare the parity distribution of women with and without induced abortions?

A study group of 576 working women \(30-49\) years of age who took phenacetin- containing analgesics and a control group of 533 comparably aged women without such intake were identified in 1968 and followed for mortality and morbidity outcomes. One hypothesis to be tested was that phenacetin intake may influence renal (kidney) function and hence have an effect on specific indices of renal morbidity and mortality. The mortality status of these women was determined from 1968 to \(1987 .\) The researchers found that 16 of the women in the study group and 1 of the women in the control group died, where at least one cause of death was considered renal [13]. Test for differences in renal mortality between the two groups in either direction, and report a two-tailed \(p\) -value. The cohort was also followed for total mortality. The researchers found that 74 women in the study group died, compared with 27 in the control group.

Two drugs (A, B) are compared for the medical treatment of duodenal ulcer. For this purpose, patients are carefully matched with regard to age, gender, and clinical condition. The treatment results based on 200 matched pairs show that for 89 matched pairs both treatments are effective; for 90 matched pairs both treatments are ineffective; for 5 matched pairs drug \(\mathrm{A}\) is effective, whereas drug \(\mathrm{B}\) is ineffective; and for 16 matched pairs drug \(B\) is effective, whereas drug \(A\) is ineffective. What test procedure can be used to assess the results?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.