/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 110 Researchers collected the follow... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Researchers collected the following data concerning comparability of diagnoses of schizophrenia obtained from primary-care physician report as compared with proxy report (from spouses). Data were collected concerning 953 people (referred to as index subjects). The researchers found that schizophrenia was identified as present on 115 physician reports and 124 proxy reports. Both physician and proxy informants identified 34 people as positive, and they are included among the 115 and 124 individuals described. In a reproducibility study, researchers contacted the 953 spouses a second time 1 year later and asked them again whether the index subject was schizophrenic. There were 112 positive reports of schizophrenia obtained, of which 89 were positive on both first and second report. Compute an index of reproducibility for proxy report of schizophrenia based on these data, and provide an interpretation of what it means.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The index of reproducibility is about 71.77%, indicating moderate reliability.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Key Values from the Exercise

First, let's identify the key values provided in the question for the calculation of the index of reproducibility. We have a total of 953 index subjects. 124 proxy reports indicated schizophrenia on the first report, with 89 of these repeated as positive on both the first and second reports a year later.
02

Calculate the Agreement Proportion

To find the index of reproducibility, calculate the proportion of positive reports that were consistent between both proxy reports. Use the formula: \( \text{Reproducibility Index} = \frac{\text{Number of consistent reports}}{\text{Total number of first positive reports}} \). Substituting in the values, we get: \( \frac{89}{124} \approx 0.7177 \).
03

Interpret the Reproducibility Index

The reproducibility index of approximately 0.7177 indicates that 71.77% of the proxy reports of schizophrenia were consistent between the first and second reports. This reflects a high level of agreement and suggests moderate reliability in how proxy reports of schizophrenia were recorded over the span of a year.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Reproducibility Study
Reproducibility studies are crucial in research as they evaluate the consistency of results across multiple instances or over time. In the context of medical studies, like the one on schizophrenia diagnosis, reproducibility ensures that findings are reliable and not just a result of chance or temporary factors. It helps validate the methods and ensures the integrity of data reported by researchers.The reproducibility index, calculated using the formula \( \text{Reproducibility Index} = \frac{\text{Number of consistent reports}}{\text{Total number of first positive reports}} \), measures the degree of reliability. For this study, the index stands at approximately 0.7177, implying that around 71.77% of reports were consistent between the first and second assessment. This index allows researchers to evaluate the reliability of proxy reports, and understand how many of these reports remain consistent upon re-evaluation. A high reproducibility index generally indicates that the method used for gathering data produces stable and repeatable results.
Schizophrenia Diagnosis
Diagnosing schizophrenia can be challenging due to its complex and varied symptoms. Schizophrenia is a severe mental health disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions. Medical professionals often rely on a combination of interviews, clinical assessments, and medical history evaluations to diagnose schizophrenia. However, the accuracy of these diagnoses is critical, as it influences treatment plans and prognosis. In the context of this study, diagnoses obtained from primary-care physicians were compared to those from proxy reports. This comparison helps in identifying potential discrepancies or agreements, ensuring that the data used in the study offers a complete view of the schizophrenic population under consideration. It also highlights the challenges in achieving consistent diagnostic conclusions and the potential need for enhanced diagnostic protocols.
Proxy Report Analysis
Proxy reports are collected from individuals who know the subject well, such as family members or spouses. This can be particularly useful in studies where the primary subjects may not be able to provide reliable self-reports, as may be the case with certain mental health conditions. In this study, the use of proxy reports from spouses played a critical role in identifying the presence of schizophrenia. The analysis of these reports involves checking for consistency across different time points, as these reports reflect the subjective observation of the proxy. The value of proxy report analysis lies in its ability to cross-verify medical diagnoses and provide a broader understanding of the subject’s condition over time. Identifying consistent reports (as was found with a reproducibility index of 71.77%) suggests that proxies can offer reliable insights into the subject’s mental health status, reinforcing the validity of the diagnosis and the ensuing data reliability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What significance test can be used to assess whether there is a relationship between receiving an antibiotic and receiving a bacterial culture while in the hospital?

A study group of 576 working women \(30-49\) years of age who took phenacetin- containing analgesics and a control group of 533 comparably aged women without such intake were identified in 1968 and followed for mortality and morbidity outcomes. One hypothesis to be tested was that phenacetin intake may influence renal (kidney) function and hence have an effect on specific indices of renal morbidity and mortality. The mortality status of these women was determined from 1968 to \(1987 .\) The researchers found that 16 of the women in the study group and 1 of the women in the control group died, where at least one cause of death was considered renal [13]. Test for differences in renal mortality between the two groups in either direction, and report a two-tailed \(p\) -value. The cohort was also followed for total mortality. The researchers found that 74 women in the study group died, compared with 27 in the control group.

A common assumption is that the gender distributions of successive offspring are independent. To test this assumption, birth records were collected from the first 5 births in 51,868 families. For families with exactly 5 children, Table 10.35 shows a frequency distribution of the number of male offs pring (from Data Set SEXRAT.DAT; see p. 110). Suppose the investigators doubt the probability of a male birth is exactly \(50 \%\) but are willing to assume the gender distributions of successive offspring are independent. What is the best estimate of the probability of a male offspring based on the observed data?

A topic of current interest is whether abortion is a risk factor for breast cancer. One issue is whether women who have had abortions are comparable to women who have not had abortions in terms of other breast-cancer risk factors. One of the best-known breast-cancer risk factors is parity (i.e., number of children), with parous women with many children having about a \(30 \%\) lower risk of breast cancer than nulliparous women (i.e., women with no children). Hence, it is important to assess whether the parity distributions of women with and without previous abortions are comparable. The data in Table 10.30 were obtained from the Nurses' Health Study on this issue. What test can be performed to compare the parity distribution of women with and without induced abortions?

A study was performed relating neonatal blood-pressure level to neonatal taste responsiveness (Zinner et al. [29]). To assess salt taste responsiveness, infants 2 to 4 days old were offered 3 solutions via nipple cannulas containing (i) water, (ii) water + 0.1 molar salt, and (iii) water + 0.3 molar salt. Infant blood pressure was measured separately with a Physiometrics machine at \(2-4\) days of age. A comparison was made between the mean number of sucks per burst of sucking (MSB) on (water + 0.3 molar salt) minus the MSB on water alone \(=\Delta\) MSB. If \(\Delta \mathrm{MSB} \leq-10,\) it was considered an aversive response; if \(\Delta \mathrm{MSB}>0\), it was considered a preferential response; otherwise, it was considered a neutral response. For the purposes of this question, the neutral response infants were eliminated and we compare the distribution of diastolic blood pressure between the aversive and preferential response infants. The results are given in Table 10.46 We wish to test whether there is an association between salt taste response and DBP quintile. State the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested to answer this question in statistical terms.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.