91Ó°ÊÓ

Moore's law: The speed of a computer chip is closely related to the number of transistors on the chip, and the number of transistors on a chip has increased with time in a remarkably consistent way. In fact, in the year 1965 Dr. Gordon E. Moore (now chairman emeritus of Intel Corporation) observed a trend and predicted that it would continue for a time. His observation, now known as Moore's law, is that every two years or so a chip is introduced with double the number of transistors of its fastest predecessor. This law can be restated \({ }^{28}\) in the following way: If time increases by 1 year, then the number of transistors is multiplied by \(10^{0.15}\). More generally, the rule is that if time increases by \(t\) years, then the number of transistors is multiplied by \(10^{0.15 t}\). For example, after 8 years the number of transistors is multiplied by \(10^{0.15 \times 8}\), or about 16 . The Dual-Core Itanium 2 processor was introduced by Intel Corporation in the year \(2006 .\) a. If a chip were introduced in the year 2013 , how many times the transistors of the Dual-Core Itanium 2 would you expect it to have? Round your answer to the nearest whole number. b. The limit of conventional computing will be reached when the size of a transistor is on the scale of an atom. At that point the number of transistors on a chip will be 1000 times that of the Dual-Core Itanium 2 . When, according to Moore's law, will that limit be reached? c. Even for unconventional computing, the laws of physics impose a limit on the speed of computation. \({ }^{29}\) The fastest speed possible corresponds to having about \(10^{40}\) times the number of transistors as on the Dual-Core Itanium 2. Assume that Moore's law will continue to be valid even for unconventional computing, and determine when this limit will be reached. Round your answer to the nearest century.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Time Difference for Part a

Calculate the number of years between 2006, when the Dual-Core Itanium 2 was released, and 2013. This difference is 2013 - 2006 = 7 years.

02

Apply Moore's Law for Part a

Using Moore's Law, the number of transistors after 7 years is multiplied by \(10^{0.15 \times 7}\). Calculate \(10^{1.05} \approx 11.22\).

03

Round the Result for Part a

Round \(11.22\) to the nearest whole number to get \(11\). Thus, a chip introduced in 2013 has 11 times the transistors of the Dual-Core Itanium 2.

04

Determine the Year for Part b

Find the time \(t\) such that \(10^{0.15t} = 1000\). Taking the logarithm, \(0.15t = \log_{10}(1000) = 3\). Therefore, \(t = \frac{3}{0.15} = 20\) years.

05

Calculate the Year for Part b

Since the Dual-Core Itanium 2 was released in 2006, the year when the limit is reached is 2006 + 20 = 2026.

06

Determine the Year for Part c

Find the time \(t\) such that \(10^{0.15t} = 10^{40}\). This simplifies to \(0.15t = 40\), leading to \(t = \frac{40}{0.15} \approx 266.67\) years.

07

Calculate the Year for Part c

Adding this time span to 2006 gives approximately 2273. Since the question asks to round to the nearest century, the answer is the 23rd century, around 2300.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

• Full Textbook Solutions

  Get detailed explanations and key concepts

• Unlimited Al creation

  Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

• Ads-free access

  To over 500 millions flashcards

• Money-back guarantee

  We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Exponential Growth

Exponential growth is a pattern of data that shows greater increases over time, creating a curve that appears to be rising in an ever-ascending arc. In the context of Moore's Law, this type of growth manifests as a doubling in the number of transistors on a chip roughly every two years. What Moore noticed is an exponential increase, a frequent occurrence in technology trends.

This means that as each year passes, the growth isn't linear—where numbers increase by a fixed amount—but rather the rate of increase itself grows. For example, if something grows by 100 units one year, it might grow by 200 the next. Each successive increment is determined by the percentage growth of what came before.

In terms of transistors, this exponential growth has resulted in massive gains in computing performance over the decades. By understanding this principle, it's easier to predict future advances based on past data. However, the rapid pace of this growth inherently comes with concerns about sustainability and the limits of such trends.

Transistors

Transistors are tiny electronic components that act like switches or amplifiers in circuits. They are fundamental to modern electronics, making everything from your smartphone to your computer possible. In essence, transistors control the flow of electrical signals, enabling devices to process information and execute tasks.

The significance of transistors in computing is directly tied to Moore's Law. By increasing the number of transistors on a chip, we can enhance processing power, allowing devices to perform more complex tasks at higher speeds. As such, the continual rise in the number of transistors per chip has been a key driver of the advancement of computer technology.

Transistor miniaturization is what has facilitated the exponential growth observed by Moore. However, reducing the size of transistors also poses challenges. As components become smaller, near-atomic scales bring new limits into play, potentially altering their behavior and efficiency. Thus, while augmenting transistor counts has led to robust progress over past decades, future advancements must address these physical limitations.

Computing Limits

As technology evolves, reaching the ultimate limits of computing involves both physical and theoretical considerations. Conventional computing is notably constrained by the size of transistors, which currently shrink to near-atomic scales. Eventually, a scenario may arise where further miniaturization is no longer feasible due to atomic size constraints.

Moore's Law traditionally assumes continuous growth, but it doesn't account for these physical boundaries. As posed in the original problem, Moore's observations suggest that by 2026, we could approach the point where transistors are atom-sized. This will represent a substantial flexibility challenge for the industry if it remains reliant solely on transistor count.

Beyond conventional limits, other constraints emerge even in advanced computing strategies. Physical laws, like the speed of light and quantum limits, imply that computation speed will have a theoretical ceiling, no matter how advanced technologies become. While innovative architectures—like quantum computing—seek to stretch these boundaries, even these novel fields must respect the fundamental laws of physics. Therefore, strategies for the future need to innovate beyond current exponential growth patterns to continue advancing computing power without exceeding these natural limits.