/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 Walking in Seattle: It is common... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Walking in Seattle: It is common in large cities for people to travel to the center city and then walk to their final destination. In Seattle the percent P of pedestrians who walk at least D feet from parking facilities in the center city is given partially in the accompanying table.22 $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Distance } D & \begin{array}{c} \text { Percent } P \text { walking } \\ \text { at least } D \text { feet } \end{array} \\ \hline 300 & 60 \\ \hline 500 & 40 \\ \hline 1000 & 18 \\ \hline 1500 & 9 \\ \hline 2000 & 5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Make a model of \(P\) as an exponential function of \(D\). b. What percentage of pedestrians walk at least 200 feet from parking facilities? c. When models of this sort are made, it is important to remember that many times they are only rough indicators of reality. Often they apply only to parts of the data and may tell very little about extremes of the data. Explain why it is not appropriate to view this as an accurate model for very short distances walked.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. \( P(D) = 80 \cdot 0.9965^D \), b. Approximately 68.2%, c. Short distances are less reliable in this model due to potentially nonlinear pedestrian behavior.

Step by step solution

01

Write the problem description

We need to determine an exponential model for the percentage of pedestrians walking at least a certain distance, \( D \), from their parking facilities in Seattle. The relationship should follow the form \( P(D) = a \cdot b^D \), where \( P \) is the percentage of pedestrians and \( a \) and \( b \) are constants we must find. We will use the provided distance-percent data points from the table.
02

Establish mathematical relationships

By analyzing the percent and distance values given (300, 60), (500, 40), (1000, 18), (1500, 9), and (2000, 5), we assume an exponential decay function. We write two equations based on the form \( P(D) = a \cdot b^D \) using two data points: \( a \cdot b^{300} = 60 \) and \( a \cdot b^{500} = 40 \).
03

Solve for constants using data points

From the two equations \( a \cdot b^{300} = 60 \) and \( a \cdot b^{500} = 40 \), divide them to eliminate \( a \): \( \frac{b^{500}}{b^{300}} = \frac{40}{60} = \frac{2}{3} \). Simplifying, we find \( b^{200} = \frac{2}{3} \). Solving for \( b \), we get \( b \approx (\frac{2}{3})^{1/200} \approx 0.9965 \). Substitute \( b \) back into one of the original equations to find \( a \): \( a = \frac{60}{b^{300}} \approx 60 \cdot (0.9965)^{-300} \approx 80 \).
04

Formulate the exponential model

With \( a \approx 80 \) and \( b \approx 0.9965 \), the model becomes \( P(D) = 80 \cdot 0.9965^D \). This describes pedestrian behavior as an exponential decay function with distance \( D \).
05

Calculate the percentage for 200 feet

Using the model \( P(D) = 80 \cdot 0.9965^D \), substitute \( D = 200 \): \( P(200) = 80 \cdot 0.9965^{200} \). Calculating, \( P(200) \approx 68.2 \). Thus, approximately 68.2% of pedestrians walk at least 200 feet.
06

Discuss model limitations

The model attempts to estimate pedestrian behavior based on certain data points. However, for very short distances like 200 feet, the model may not accurately depict reality due to the potential nonlinear nature of pedestrian behaviors at low distances, as parking patterns and other urban design factors could significantly influence more localized pedestrian movement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Pedestrian Behavior
In large urban settings like Seattle, people often need to walk from parking areas to reach their destinations. Studying pedestrian behavior involves understanding how far people are typically willing to walk after parking. Such behavior is crucial for urban planning and developing efficient pedestrian pathways.

We often find that fewer people are inclined to walk longer distances. This behavior can be observed and recorded in data tables, such as the one given in the exercise showing the percentage of pedestrians who walk varying distances.
  • Different distances are recorded in the table, with columns indicating distance walked and the corresponding percentage of pedestrians.
  • This data helps in identifying patterns in walking behavior and is significant in planning city infrastructure.
  • By modeling this data, we can predict pedestrian behavior for other distances not specifically measured in the original data.
Urban designers and planners use insights from pedestrian behavior data to improve transportation systems and the overall walkability of the city.
Exponential Decay
Exponential decay is a mathematical process where quantities decrease at a rate proportional to their current value. This concept is crucial in many natural and physical phenomena, and it also applies to pedestrian behavior modeling.

When we describe the percentage of people walking a certain distance using exponential decay, the number of pedestrians decreases as the distance increases. This is captured in the mathematical model we derived:
  • The formula follows the general form of exponential decay: \( P(D) = a \cdot b^D \), where \( a \) is the initial percentage of pedestrians and \( b \) is the decay factor.
  • In our model, this factor \( b \) is slightly less than 1 (0.9965), indicating a slow decay as distance \( D \) increases.
  • The value of \( a \) is initially 80, representing the maximum percentage of pedestrians willing to walk very short distances.
This decay factor demonstrates how quickly the pedestrian numbers drop off as distance increases, aligning with our common understanding that fewer people will walk longer distances.
Mathematical Modeling
Mathematical modeling involves creating abstract representations of real-world scenarios using mathematical equations. This helps in better understanding complex systems and predicting outcomes.

In the exercise, a mathematical model in the form of an exponential function is used to represent pedestrian behavior as they walk varying distances:
  • Our model is represented by \( P(D) = 80 \cdot 0.9965^D \), which predicts the percentage of people walking at least a distance \( D \).
  • The model is constructed using data points from the given table, ensuring that the predictions are grounded in observed behavior.
  • This model allows us to estimate pedestrian percentages for distances not originally included in the data table.
By using mathematical models, we can analyze patterns and trends in pedestrian behavior, which are valuable for city planners to address transportation needs effectively. It's important to remember, however, that models may not capture all real-world variables and are often approximations.
Data Analysis
Data analysis is the systematic inspection, cleansing, transformation, and modeling of data to discover useful information and support decision-making. In the context of the exercise, data analysis helps us decode the relationship between distance walked and pedestrian percentage.

The key steps in data analysis here involved:
  • Plotting the given data, which details the percentage of pedestrians at various distances, helps visualize the trend.
  • Applying mathematical techniques to fit an exponential model, illustrating the decay in pedestrian percentages as distances increase.
  • Interpreting the output, such as calculating the percentage at a specific distance like 200 feet, to extract actionable insights.
This analysis is vital not just for academic exercises but also for urban ecological studies, transportation predictions, and improving city planners' ability to design infrastructures that cater to pedestrian needs and encourage walking.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

APR and APY: Recall that financial institutions sometimes report the annual interest rate that they offer on investments as the APR, often called the nominal interest rate. To indicate how an investment will actually grow, they advertise the annual percentage yield, or APY. \({ }^{7}\) In mathematical terms, this is the yearly percentage growth rate for the exponential function that models the account balance. In this exercise and the next, we study the relationship between the APR and the APY. We assume that the APR is \(10 \%\), or \(0.1\) as a decimal. To determine the APY when we know the APR, we need to know how often interest is compounded. For example, suppose for the moment that interest is compounded twice a year. Then to say that the APR is \(10 \%\) means that in half a year, the balance grows by \(\frac{10}{2} \%\) (or \(5 \%\) ). In other words, the \(\frac{1}{2}\) year percentage growth rate is \(\frac{0.1}{2}\) (as a decimal). Thus the \(\frac{1}{2}\)-year growth factor is \(1+\frac{0.1}{2}\). To find the yearly growth factor, we need to perform a unit conversion: One year is 2 half-year periods, so the yearly growth factor is \(\left(1+\frac{0.1}{2}\right)^{2}\), or \(1.1025\). a. What is the yearly growth factor if interest is compounded four times a year? b. Assume that interest is compounded \(n\) times each year. Explain why the formula for the yearly growth factor is $$ \left(1+\frac{0.1}{n}\right)^{n} $$ c. What is the yearly growth factor if interest is compounded daily? Give your answer to four decimal places.

Grains of wheat on a chess board: A children's fairy tale tells of a clever elf who extracted from a king the promise to give him one grain of wheat on a chess board square today, two grains on an adjacent square tomorrow, four grains on an adjacent square the next day, and so on, doubling the number of grains each day until all 64 squares of the chess board were used. How many grains of wheat did the hapless king contract to place on the 64th square? There are about \(1.1\) million grains of wheat in a bushel. Assume that a bushel of wheat sells for \(\$ 4.25\). What was the value of the wheat on the 64th square?

Population: A biologist has found the following linear model for the natural logarithm of an animal population as a function of time: $$ \ln N=0.039 t-0.693 . $$ Here \(t\) is time in years and \(N\) is the population in thousands. Find an exponential model for the population.

Growth in length: In the fishery sciences it is important to determine the length of a fish as a function of its age. One common approach, the von Bertalanffy model, uses a decreasing exponential function of age to describe the growth in length yet to be attained; in other words, the difference between the maximum length and the current length is supposed to decay exponentially with age. The following table shows the length \(L\), in inches, at age \(t\), in years, of the North Sea sole. \({ }^{40}\) $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline t=\text { age } & L \text { = length } & t=\text { age } & L=\text { length } \\ \hline 1 & 3.7 & 5 & 12.7 \\ \hline 2 & 7.5 & 6 & 13.5 \\ \hline 3 & 10.0 & 7 & 14.0 \\ \hline 4 & 11.5 & 8 & 14.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The maximum length attained by the sole is \(14.8\) inches. a. Make a table showing, for each age, the difference \(D\) between the maximum length and the actual length \(L\) of the sole. b. Find the exponential function that approximates \(D\) using the logarithm as a link. c. Find a formula expressing the length \(L\) of a sole as a function of its age \(t\). d. Draw a graph of \(L\) against \(t\).

The Beer-Lambert-Bouguer law: When light strikes the surface of a medium such as water or glass, its intensity decreases with depth. The BeerLambert-Bouguer law states that the percentage of decrease is the same for each additional unit of depth. In a certain lake, intensity decreases about \(75 \%\) for each additional meter of depth. a. Explain why intensity \(I\) is an exponential function of depth \(d\) in meters. b. Use a formula to express intensity \(I\) as an exponential function of \(d\). (Use \(I_{0}\) to denote the initial intensity.) c. Explain in practical terms the meaning of \(I_{0}\). d. At what depth will the intensity of light be onetenth of the intensity of light striking the surface?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.