/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 71 (a) For the capture-recapture me... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) For the capture-recapture method to give a reasonable estimate of \(N\), what assumptions about the two samples must be true? (b) Give reasons why the assumptions in (a) may not hold true in many situations.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Assumptions for a reasonable estimate are thorough mixing, no marking effect, no population size change, and equal capture probability. These may not hold due to poor mixing, marking effects, population size changes, and unequal capture probability.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying Assumptions of the Capture-Recapture Method

For the capture-recapture method to provide a reasonable estimate of the total population size (\(N\)), certain assumptions must be satisfied. These assumptions include: 1) the marked individuals have thoroughly mixed back into the population before the recapture sample is taken, 2) the marking does not affect the chance of being recaptured, 3) there is no change in the population size due to births, deaths, immigration, or emigration between the time of capture and recapture, and 4) each individual has the same probability of being captured in both the initial capture and the recapture.
02

Explaining Why Assumptions May Not Hold

There are various reasons why the assumptions for the capture-recapture method may not hold in practice. These can include: 1) Marked individuals may not mix well with the rest of the population and are either more easily captured or avoid capture, 2) the marks may affect the animals' behavior or increase their visibility, which affects their recapture rate, 3) the population size may indeed change in the interim period due to natural causes or migration, and 4) not all individuals may have an equal likelihood of capture due to behavior, location, or other factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Estimation
Understanding how to accurately estimate the size of a wildlife population is a critical skill in the field of ecology. One classic method for population estimation is the capture-recapture technique. Simple in theory, this method involves capturing a number of individuals from a population, marking them in some way, and then releasing them back into the wild. After sufficient time for mixing, a second sample is captured, and the number of marked individuals within this sample is recorded. The basic formula for estimating the total population size () based on this method is given by:
\[N = \frac{C1 \times C2}{R}\]
where \(C1\) is the number of individuals captured in the first sample, \(C2\) is the number of individuals captured in the second sample, and \(R\) is the number of marked individuals recaptured in the second sample. The accuracy of this method hinges on the fulfillment of specific assumptions to ensure a bias-free estimate of the population.
Sampling Assumptions
For a capture-recapture study to yield accurate results, we rely on several assumptions that must be met:
  • Marked individuals must evenly mix with the unmarked population before the second capture.
  • The marking should not affect an individual's vulnerability or visibility, thus not affecting their chances of recapture.
  • No changes in population size from external factors like births, deaths, or migration should occur between captures.
  • Every individual in the population should have an equal probability of capture in both the initial and the recapture samples.

However, meeting these conditions in a real-world setting can be challenging due to the complexities of animal behavior and environmental variables. Marked individuals might behave differently or become more noticeable, affecting their recapture probability. And natural population changes, such as mating seasons, predation, or migration, could alter population size between the sampling events. These potential deviations from the assumptions need to be carefully considered when interpreting the results of the capture-recapture method.
Ecological Statistics
The application of statistical methods to ecological data is essential when interpreting study results and making informed decisions about conservation and wildlife management. Ecological statistics involve techniques that account for variability and uncertainty inherent in natural systems. When applying the capture-recapture method, ecologists utilize statistical models that estimate population size while considering the uncertainty around the assumptions being met.

In practice, this may involve using statistical adjustments for potential biases or applying more complex models that account for non-random mixing, varying capture probabilities, or populations that are open (subject to births, deaths, and movements). Additionally, statistical tests can help determine whether the marked and unmarked individuals in a population are indeed mixing randomly, which is fundamental for the assumptions of the capture-recapture method. By integrating robust statistical analysis with field data, ecologists can provide more reliable population estimates and contribute to the sustainable management of ecological resources.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to the following story: The city of Cleansburg has 8325 registered voters. There is an election for mayor of Cleansburg, and there are three candidates for the position: Smith, Jones, and Brown. The day before the election a tele. phone poll of 680 randomly chosen registered voters produced the following results: 306 people surveyed indicated that they would vote for Smith, 272 indicated that they would vote for Jones and I02 indicated that they would vote for Brown. 17\. (a) Describe the population for this survey. (b) Describe the sample for this survey. (c) Name the sampling method used for this survey.

Refer to the following story: The city of Cleansburg has 8325 registered voters. There is an election for mayor of Cleansburg, and there are three candidates for the position: Smith, Jones, and Brown. The day before the election a tele. phone poll of 680 randomly chosen registered voters produced the following results: 306 people surveyed indicated that they would vote for Smith, 272 indicated that they would vote for Jones and I02 indicated that they would vote for Brown. Given that in the actual election Smith received \(42 \%\) of the vote. Jones \(43 \%\) of the vote, and Brown \(15 \%\) of the vote, find the sampling errors in the survey expressed as percentages.

An article in the Providence Jourmal about automobile accident fatalities includes the following observation: "Fortytwo percent of all fatalities occurred on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, apparently because of increased drinking on the weekends." (a) Give a possible argument as to why the conclusion drawn may not be justified by the data. (b) Give a different possible argument as to why the conclusion drawn may be justified by the data after all.

Leading-question bias. The way the questions in many surveys are phrased can itself be a source of bias. When a question is worded in such a way as to predispose the respondent to provide a particular response, the results of the survey are tainted by a special type of bias called leading-question bias. The following is an extreme hypothetical situation intended to drive the point home. In an effort to find out how the American taxpayer feels about a tax increase, the Institute for Tax Reform conducts a "scientific" one-question poll. Are you in favor of paving higher taxes to bail the federal government out of its disastrous economic policies and its mismanagement of the federal budget? Yes. No Ninety-five percent of the respondents answered no. (a) Explain why the results of this survey might be invalid. (b) Rephrase the question in a neutral way. Pay particular attention to highly charged words. (c) Make up your own (more subtle) example of leadingquestion bias. Analyze the critical words that are the cause of bias.

Refer to a study on the effectiveness of an HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccine conducted between October 1998 and November 1999. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection-more than 20 million Americans are infected with HPV-but most HPV infections are benign, and in most cases infected individuals are not even aware they are infected. (On the other hand, some HPV infections can lead to cervical cancer in women.) The researchers recruited 2392 women from 16 different centers across the United States to participate in the study through advertisements on college campuses and in the surrounding communities. To be eligible to participate in the study, the subjects had to meet the following criteria: (1) be a female between 16 and 23 years of age, (2) not be pregnant, (3) have no prior abnormal Pap smears, and (4) report to have had sexual relations with no more than five men. At each center, half of the participants were randomly selected to receive the HPV vaccine, and the other half received a placebo injection. After 17.4 months, the incidence of HPV infection was 3.8 per 100 woman-years at risk in the placebo group and 0 per 100 woman-years at risk in the vaccine group. In addition, all nine cases of HPV-related cervical precancerous growths occurred among the placebo recipients. [Source: New England Journal of Medicine, \(347,\) no. 21 (November 21,2002\(): 1645-1651\). (a) Describe the sample for the study. (b) Was the sample chosen using random sampling? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.