/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 Leading-question bias. The way t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Leading-question bias. The way the questions in many surveys are phrased can itself be a source of bias. When a question is worded in such a way as to predispose the respondent to provide a particular response, the results of the survey are tainted by a special type of bias called leading-question bias. The following is an extreme hypothetical situation intended to drive the point home. In an effort to find out how the American taxpayer feels about a tax increase, the Institute for Tax Reform conducts a "scientific" one-question poll. Are you in favor of paving higher taxes to bail the federal government out of its disastrous economic policies and its mismanagement of the federal budget? Yes. No Ninety-five percent of the respondents answered no. (a) Explain why the results of this survey might be invalid. (b) Rephrase the question in a neutral way. Pay particular attention to highly charged words. (c) Make up your own (more subtle) example of leadingquestion bias. Analyze the critical words that are the cause of bias.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The original survey results are invalid due to leading-question bias introduced by negatively charged language. A neutral rephrasing would be 'Do you think that an increase in taxes is a good strategy for managing the federal budget?' A subtle example of leading-question bias could be 'Don't you agree that it's essential to protect our children from the dangers of unregulated internet access?' which could be replaced with 'What is your opinion on the regulation of internet access for children?'

Step by step solution

01

Identify Leading-question Bias

Leading-question bias occurs when a survey question is phrased in a way that suggests a particular answer is desired. It can skew the results and does not reflect an accurate or unbiased representation of the respondents' true opinions. In the provided survey question, words like 'paving higher taxes', 'bail the federal government out', 'disastrous economic policies', and 'mismanagement of the federal budget' imply negative consequences and incompetence, which can predispose respondents to answer 'no'.
02

Rephrase the Survey Question

To eliminate leading-question bias and obtain more valid results, the question must be rephrased in a neutral manner, devoid of emotionally charged or suggestive language. A more neutral question might be: 'Do you think that an increase in taxes is a good strategy for managing the federal budget?' This phrasing is straightforward and avoids using language that could influence the respondents' answers.
03

Create a Subtle Leading-question Example

For a more subtle example of leading-question bias, consider the survey question: 'Don't you agree that it's essential to protect our children from the dangers of unregulated internet access?' The critical words that cause bias in this question are 'essential' and 'dangers of unregulated internet access,' which suggest that unregulated internet access is inherently dangerous and that regulation is necessary. A less biased approach would be: 'What is your opinion on the regulation of internet access for children?' This phrasing does not imply a correct answer and leaves room for respondents to provide various opinions on the issue.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Survey Design
Effective survey design is a critical component of any research project that seeks to gather data through questionnaires. When designing a survey, it's essential to ensure that questions are structured in a way that prevents bias and yields meaningful, actionable insights. This includes deciding on the type of questions (e.g., open-ended, multiple choice), the order in which they're presented, and the language used.

In our example, the Institute for Tax Reform's survey design is flawed due to the use of leading-question bias, which influences respondents' answers and undermines the survey's validity. To improve survey design, it’s pivotal to craft questions that are clear, unbiased, and allow individuals to provide their true opinions without feeling guided towards a particular response.

Additionally, survey designers must consider the sampling method, the demographic of participants, and how to effectively analyze the collected data. Ensuring that all of these factors work together harmoniously greatly enhances the quality of the results and the conclusions drawn from them.
Question Phrasing
The phrasing of a survey question can significantly impact the responses received, thereby affecting the reliability and accuracy of the survey's findings. Question phrasing should be neutral and avoid using emotionally charged words or terms that carry connotations. This is where many surveys, including our example, fall short.

By replacing highly charged words with neutral language, the question 'Are you in favor of paying higher taxes to bail the federal government out of its disastrous economic policies and its mismanagement of the federal budget?' transforms into 'Do you support an increase in taxes to address the federal budget deficit?' This rephrased question eliminates bias and encourages candid responses.

Precise and carefully considered question phrasing helps in minimizing the risk of misunderstanding or misinterpretation by respondents, leading to more reliable data. It’s also wise to pretest questions on a small group before conducting the full survey to observe if the phrasing elicits any unintentional bias or confusion.
Research Validity
Research validity refers to the extent to which the results and conclusions derived from a study accurately reflect reality. For surveys, validity is closely tied to how questions are asked and the absence of bias in responses. If a survey's design or phrasing of questions leads participants towards a specific answer, such as the leading-question bias highlighted in our example, the validity of the entire study can be called into question.

To enhance research validity, it's imperative to ensure that the survey measures what it intends to and that results are not swayed by the wording or structure of questions. Avoiding ambiguous, confusing, or leading questions, and ensuring a representative sample is selected, are all fundamental steps towards achieving valid research outcomes.

When analyzing survey results, researchers should also be cautious of other factors that might affect validity, such as social desirability bias, where respondents answer in a manner they think is more socially acceptable, or selection bias, where the sample does not accurately reflect the population being studied.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One implicit assumption when using the capture-recapture method to estimate the size of a population is that the capture process is truly random, with all individuals having the same likelihood of being captured. Sometimes that is not true, and some populations have a large number of individuals that are "trap-happy" individuals (more prone to capture than others, more likely to take the bait, less cagey, slower, dumber, etc.). If that were the case, would the capture-recapture method be likely to underestimate or overestimate the size of the population? Explain your answer.

Refer to the following story: The manufacturer of a new vitamin (vitamin \(X\) ) decides to sponsor a shudy to determine the vitamin's effectiveness in curing the common cold. Five hundred college students having a cold were recruited from colleges in the San Diego area and were paid to participate as subjects in this study, The subjects were each given two tablets of vitamin \(X\) a day. Based on information provided by the subjects themselves, 457 of the 500 subjects were cured of their colds within 3 days. (The average number of days a cold lasts is 4.87 days.) As a result of this study, the mamufacturer launched an advertising campaign based on the claim that "vitamin \(X\) is more than \(90 \%\) effective in curing the common cold." (a) Describe as specifically as you can the target population for the study. (b) Describe the sampling frame for the study. (c) Describe the sample used for the study.

Refer to a clinical study conducted at the Houston Veterans Administration Medical Center on the effectiveness of knee surgery to cure degenerative arthritis (osteoarthritis) of the knee. Of the 324 individuals who met the inclusion criteria for the study, 144 declined to participate. The researchers randomly divided the remaining 180 subjects into three groups: One group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called debridement; a second group received a type of arthroscopic knee surgery called lavage; and a third group received skin incisions to make it look like they had had arthroscopic knee surgery, but no actual surgery was performed. The patients in the study did not know which group they were in and in particular did not know if they were receiving the real surgery or simulated surgery. All the patients who participated in the study were evaluated for two years after the procedure. In the two-year follow-up, all three groups said that they had slightly less pain and better knee movement, but the "fake" surgery group often reported the best results. [Source: New England Journal of Medicine, \(347,\) no. 2 (July 11 , 2002)\(: 81-88 .\) (a) Could this study be considered a randomized controlled study? Explain. (b) Was this Study blind, double blind, or neither?

An article in the Providence Jourmal about automobile accident fatalities includes the following observation: "Fortytwo percent of all fatalities occurred on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, apparently because of increased drinking on the weekends." (a) Give a possible argument as to why the conclusion drawn may not be justified by the data. (b) Give a different possible argument as to why the conclusion drawn may be justified by the data after all.

Darroch's method. is a method for estimating the size of a population using multiple (more than two) captures. For example, suppose that there are four captures of sizes \(n_{1}, n_{2}, n_{3},\) and \(n_{4},\) respectively, and let \(M\) be the total number of distinct individuals caught in the four captures (i.e., an individual that is captured in more than one capture is counted only once). Darroch's method gives the estimate for \(N\) as the unique solution of the equation \(\left(1-\frac{M}{N}\right)=\left(1-\frac{n_{1}}{N}\right)\left(1-\frac{n_{2}}{N}\right)\left(1-\frac{n_{3}}{N}\right)\left(1-\frac{n_{4}}{N}\right) .\) (a) Suppose that we are estimating the size of a population of fish in a pond using four separate captures. The sizes of the captures are \(n_{1}=30, n_{2}=15, n_{3}=22\), and \(n_{4}=45 .\) The number of distinct fish caught is \(M=75 .\) Estimate the size of the population using Darroch's formula. (b) Show that with just two captures Darroch's method gives the same answer as the capture-recapture method.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.