/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 Temperature and Jumping Performa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Temperature and Jumping Performance A study was done on spotted grass frogs to see whether temperature affects their jumping performance. Twenty frogs were randomly selected to be kept under a temperature-regulated structure (TRS). Twenty similar frogs were randomly selected and kept separately in normal atmosphere (NA). The selected frogs were of the same age range. The frogs, were observed for 30 days. Jumping performance improved in two NA frogs whereas the performance improved in 15 TRS frogs. a. What percentage of the NA frogs and the TRS frogs in the sample showed improved jumping performance? Compare these percentages and comment. b. Create a two-way table showing the observed values. Label the columns (across the top) with TRS and NA. c. Test the hypothesis that the temperature is associated with jumping performance (at the \(0.05\) level of significance).

Short Answer

Expert verified
10% of NA frogs showed improved jumping performance and 75% of TRS frogs showed improved performance. The two-way table presents these values clearly. From the hypothesis test, we can conclude whether the temperature is associated with jumping performance based on the comparison of the calculated chi-square value and the critical value.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of Percentages

The number of NA frogs showing improvement is 2 out of 20. Therefore, the percentage of NA frogs showing improvement can be calculated as \(\frac{2}{20}\) * 100 which is 10%. \n Similarly, The number of TRS frogs showing improvement is 15 out of 20. So, the percentage of TRS frogs showing improved performance can be calculated as \(\frac{15}{20} \) * 100 which equals 75%.
02

Creating a two-way table

A two-way table can be created using the given data: \n \[\begin{{tabular}}{{|c|c|c|}}\hline & TRS & NA \\\hlineImproved & 15 & 2 \\\hlineNot Improved & 5 & 18 \\\hline\end{{tabular}}\]
03

Formulating the hypothesis

The hypotheses for this problem will be: \n Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): There is no association between temperature and jumping performance. \n Alternate Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): There is an association between temperature and jumping performance.
04

Testing the Hypothesis

Using a chi-square test for independence, we can check for the association. Here, we need to calculate the expected frequencies for each cell in the two-way table, find out the chi-square value and then compare it with the critical value for significance level 0.05. If the calculated chi-square value is higher than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make decisions about populations based on sample data. It helps determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population. In our case, we want to know if temperature has any effect on the jumping performance of frogs.

We start by formulating two hypotheses:
  • The **Null Hypothesis ( H_0 )**: This is a statement suggesting that there is no effect or association between two variables. Here, it means that temperature does not impact jumping performance.
  • The **Alternate Hypothesis ( H_a )**: Contrary to the null, this suggests there is some effect or association. In our exercise, it means temperature is associated with jumping performance.
To test these hypotheses, we use statistical tools, like the chi-square test. We determine the likelihood that observed outcomes are due to chance or if they significantly differ from what was expected. If the observed data vastly differ from what was expected under the null hypothesis, we may reject the null in favor of the alternative.
Two-Way Table
A two-way table, also known as a contingency table, is a visual representation of the frequency distribution of variables. It's particularly useful in categorical data analysis, helping to observe the interaction between two variables.

In our exercise, we created a two-way table to display the association between temperature and the frogs' jumping performance. The table is organized in rows and columns, showing the number of frogs that improved or didn’t improve under Normal Atmosphere (NA) and Temperature Regulated Structure (TRS).
  • Rows represent the different outcomes (Improved, Not Improved).
  • Columns signify the experimental groups (TRS, NA).
This table helps in visualizing data clearly, facilitating the understanding of any association or lack thereof between the two factors—temperature and performance.
Temperature and Performance
Understanding the link between environmental factors, like temperature, and biological performance is critical in numerous fields such as ecology and physiology. For the study with frogs, temperatures possibly impacted their ability to perform better. In our scenario, frogs kept in the Temperature Regulated Structure (TRS) showed a higher improvement rate in their jumping performance compared to those kept in Normal Atmosphere (NA). Specifically, 75% of TRS frogs improved as opposed to just 10% of NA frogs.
Temperature can influence metabolic rates, muscle function, and overall energy levels, contributing to performance variations. By assessing percentages and statistical associations, we deduce whether such influences in our study, are significant or could have occurred by chance—a core query in hypothesis testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Read the following abstract and explain what it shows. A rate ratio of 1 means there is no difference in rates, and a confidence interval for rate ratios that captures 1 means there is no significant difference in rates. (An intensivist is a doctor who specializes in intensive care.) We conducted a 1-year randomized trial in an academic medical ICU of the effects of nighttime staffing with in-hospital intensivists (intervention) as compared with nighttime coverage by daytime intensivists who were available for consultation by telephone (control). We randomly assigned blocks of 7 consecutive nights to the intervention or the control strategy. The primary outcome was patients' length of stay in the ICU. Secondary outcomes were patients' length of stay in the hospital, ICU and in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, and rates of readmission to the ICU. A total of 1598 patients were included in the analyses. ... Patients who were admitted on intervention days were exposed to nighttime intensivists on more nights than were patients admitted on control days. Nonetheless, intensivist staffing on the night of admission did not have a significant effect on the length of stay in the ICU (rate ratio for the time to ICU discharge, \(0.98 ; 95 \%\) confidence interval [CI], \(0.88\) to \(1.09\); \(\mathrm{P}=0.72\) ), on ICU mortality (relative risk, \(1.07 ; 95 \%\) CI, \(0.90\) to \(1.28\) ), or on any other end point.

Drug for Rheumatoid Arthritis Read the portion of the abstract of a scientific study that appears below, and then answer the questions that follow. "Methods: In this ... double-blind, placebo-controlled ... study, 611 patients were randomly assigned, in a \(4: 4: 1\) ratio, to [receive] \(5 \mathrm{mg}\) of tofacitinib twice daily, \(10 \mathrm{mg}\) of tofacitinib twice daily, or placebo. The primary end point, assessed at month 3, was the percentage of patients with at least a \(20 \%\) improvement on the American College of Rheumatology scale (ACR 20 ), Results: At month 3 , a higher percentage of patients in the tofacitinib groups than in the placebo groups met the criteria for an ACR 20 response \((59.8 \%\) in the \(5-\mathrm{mg}\) tofacitinib group and \(65.7 \%\) in the \(10-\mathrm{mg}\) tofacitinib group vs. \(26.7 \%\) in the placebo group, \(\mathrm{P}<0.001\) for both comparisons)." a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain. c. Do the sample percentages suggest that the drug was effective in achieving a \(20 \%\) reduction in symptoms? d. What does the small p-value show? c. Can you conclude that the use of tofacitinib increases the chances of a \(20 \%\) improvement in symptoms? Why or why not?

A Drug for Platelets Platelets are an important part of the blood because they cause the blood to clot when that is needed to stop bleeding. The drug eltrombopag (which we shall henceforth refer to as EL), was tried on patients with chronic liver disease who were about to be operated on to see whether it would prevent the need for transfusion of platelets during the surgery and shortly thereafter. Read the following excerpt from the abstract that accompanied this study, and answer the questions below. "Methods: We randomly assigned 292 patients with chronic liver disease of diverse causes and platelet counts of less than 50,000 per cubic millimeter to receive EL, at a dose of \(75 \mathrm{mg}\) daily, or placebo for 14 days before a planned elective invasive procedure that was performed within 5 days after the last dose. The primary end point was the avoidance of a platelet transfusion before, during, and up to 7 days after the procedure. Results: A platelet transfusion was avoided in 104 of 145 patients who received EL (72\%) and in 28 of 147 who received placebo \((19 \%)(\mathrm{P}<0.001) . "\) (Source: Nezam Afdhal et al. 2012 . Eltrombopag before procedures in patients with cirrhosis and thrombocytopenia. New England Journal of Medicine \(367,716-724 .)\) a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or observational study. Explain. c. Do the sample percentages suggest that the drug was effective in reducing the chance of needing platelet transfusions? d. What does the small p-value show? c. Can you conclude that the use of EL reduces the chance of needing a platelet transfusion? Why or why not?

Odd-Even Formula A survey was taken of a random sample of people noting their gender and asking whether they agreed with the Odd-Even Formula (OEF) to control the alarming levels of air pollution. Minitab results are shown. \(=1\) 2 Chi-square Test for Association: Opinion, Gender ciat:1 Rows: Ooinion Columns: Gender $$ \begin{array}{rr}\text { Male Female } \\ \text { Disagree } & 42 & 44 \\\ 42.17 & 43.83 \\ \text { Agree } & 11.4 & 86 \\ & 110 & 14.17 & \\ & 109.83 & \\ \mathrm{All} & & \\ & 152 & 158 & 310 \\ \text { Cel1 Contents: } & \text { Count } \\ & \text { Expected count } \\ \text { Pearson Chi-Square }=0.002, \mathrm{DF}=1, \text { p-value }=0.966\end{array} $$ a. Find the percentage of men and women in the sample who agreed with the OEF method, and compare these percentages. b. Test the hypothesis that opinions about OEF and gender are independent using a significance level of \(0.05\). c. Does this suggest that men and women have significantly different views about the OEF method?

Drug for Asthma (Example 8) Eosinophils are a form of white blood cell that is often present in people suffering from allergies. People with asthma and high levels of eosinophils who used steroid inhalers were given either a new drug or a placebo. Read extracts from the abstract of this study that appear below, and then evaluate the study. See page 539 for questions and guidance. "Methods: We enrolled patients with persistent, moderate-tosevere asthma and a blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells per microliter ... who used medium-dose to high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids.... We administered dupilumab \((300 \mathrm{mg})\) or placebo subcutaneously once weekly. The primary end point was the occurrence of an asthma exacerbation [worsening]. Results: A total of 52 patients were [randomly] assigned to the dupilumab group, and 52 patients were [randomly] assigned to the placebo group..... Three patients had an asthma exacerbation with dupilumab \((6 \%)\) versus 23 with placebo \((44 \%)\), corresponding to an \(87 \%\) reduction with dupilumab (odds ratio, \(0.08 ; 95 \%\) confidence interval, \(0.02\) to \(0.28 ; \mathrm{P}<0.001)\). Conclusions: In patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe asthma and elevated eosinophil levels who used inhaled glucocorticoids and LABAs, dupilumab therapy, as compared with placebo, was associated with fewer asthma exacerbations [worsenings]."

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.