/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 A Drug for Platelets Platelets a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A Drug for Platelets Platelets are an important part of the blood because they cause the blood to clot when that is needed to stop bleeding. The drug eltrombopag (which we shall henceforth refer to as EL), was tried on patients with chronic liver disease who were about to be operated on to see whether it would prevent the need for transfusion of platelets during the surgery and shortly thereafter. Read the following excerpt from the abstract that accompanied this study, and answer the questions below. "Methods: We randomly assigned 292 patients with chronic liver disease of diverse causes and platelet counts of less than 50,000 per cubic millimeter to receive EL, at a dose of \(75 \mathrm{mg}\) daily, or placebo for 14 days before a planned elective invasive procedure that was performed within 5 days after the last dose. The primary end point was the avoidance of a platelet transfusion before, during, and up to 7 days after the procedure. Results: A platelet transfusion was avoided in 104 of 145 patients who received EL (72\%) and in 28 of 147 who received placebo \((19 \%)(\mathrm{P}<0.001) . "\) (Source: Nezam Afdhal et al. 2012 . Eltrombopag before procedures in patients with cirrhosis and thrombocytopenia. New England Journal of Medicine \(367,716-724 .)\) a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or observational study. Explain. c. Do the sample percentages suggest that the drug was effective in reducing the chance of needing platelet transfusions? d. What does the small p-value show? c. Can you conclude that the use of EL reduces the chance of needing a platelet transfusion? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) The treatment variable is the administration of the eltrombopag (EL), and the response variable is the avoidance of a platelet transfusion. b) This was a controlled experiment, as the researchers manipulated the treatment variable and randomly assigned patients to treatment groups. c) Based on the sample percentages, the drug appears effective in reducing the need for platelet transfusions. d) The p-value \(<0.001\) suggests there's a very low chance that the observed results occurred by chance. e) The analysis allows us to conclude that the use of EL appears to reduce the need for a platelet transfusion. However, more research might be needed to establish a definitive cause-and-effect relationship, taking into account possible confounding variables and uncertainty.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the Variables

In this study, the treatment variable is the administration of the drug eltrombopag, and the response variable is whether or not a platelet transfusion was required during and following surgery.
02

Determining the Study Type

This was a controlled experiment. This can be determined by noting that the researchers actively manipulated the treatment variable (the administration of eltrombopag or a placebo) and randomly assigned patients to either treatment group, which allows for the establishment of cause and effect relationships.
03

Interpreting Sample Percentages

By comparing the percentages of patients who avoided a platelet transfusion in both groups, it seems that the drug was effective in reducing the need for platelet transfusions. More specifically, 72% of patients receiving eltrombopag (EL) avoided a platelet transfusion compared to 19% of patients who received the placebo.
04

Understanding the P-Value

A p-value of less than 0.001 indicates there is a very low probability that the observed results occurred by chance. It offers strong evidence against the null hypothesis, which assumes there is no effect from the treatment.
05

Drawing a Conclusion

Based on the percentages and the low p-value, we can conclude that the use of EL appears to reduce the need for a platelet transfusion. However, before establishing a definitive cause-and-effect relationship, more research may be needed to account for confounding variables and uncertainty. It's also important to note that conclusions from statistical analyses should not replace clinical judgement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Treatment Variable
In the context of the study exploring eltrombopag (EL) as a treatment for patients with chronic liver disease, the treatment variable is a pivotal aspect of the experiment design. A treatment variable is essentially what researchers manipulate or control to observe its effects on another variable.
Here, the treatment variable is the actual administration of the EL drug at a dosage of 75 mg daily. Participants of the study were divided into two main groups: those receiving the drug and those receiving a placebo. By controlling this variable, researchers can carefully assess the difference in outcomes directly attributable to the EL medication, rather than other external factors.
This manipulation helps to shed light on how the drug influences the patients' need for platelet transfusions, making it central to understanding the effectiveness of the treatment.
Response Variable
The response variable in any experiment represents the outcome or effect observed due to the manipulation of the treatment variable. In this controlled study, the response variable is whether or not a patient requires a platelet transfusion during or after the surgery.
The primary goal is to measure the EL drug's effectiveness in minimizing the need for such transfusions.
  • If fewer transfusions are needed in the group receiving EL compared to the placebo group, it indicates a positive response to the treatment.
  • The specific percentages of patients not needing a transfusion—72% for those on EL and 19% for the placebo group—highlight this variable's critical role in assessing treatment impact.
Understanding the response variable is crucial as it provides concrete data around which the effectiveness of the treatment, as well as the result of the entire study, is evaluated.
P-Value
The p-value plays an essential role in statistical analysis, helping determine the significance of the experiment results. In this study, a p-value of less than 0.001 indicates a very strong evidence against the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis typically would suggest that EL has no effect on the need for platelet transfusions.
A small p-value such as this one suggests that the likelihood of obtaining the observed outcomes under the assumption of the null hypothesis is extremely low. This indicates a significant difference between the treatment groups and supports the conclusion that EL administration possibly leads to fewer required transfusions.
Utilizing the p-value results in appreciating whether the observed difference is meaningful or merely due to random chance. Hence, scientists or researchers can make more informed decisions regarding the effectiveness of the treatment based on statistical evidence rather than assumptions or speculation.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis is a powerful tool used to deduce conclusions from data sets in scientific research. In this experiment, statistical analysis helps in interpreting data collected from patients receiving both EL and placebo, comparing outcomes, and assessing the effectiveness of treatment.
Data regarding the percentages of patients who avoided a platelet transfusion effectively show that 72% of patients treated with EL did not need a transfusion, whereas only 19% of those given a placebo avoided one.
  • This analysis involves descriptive statistics, which summarise the basic features of the data.
  • Inferential statistics are then employed to make predictions or inferences about a larger population from the sample data.
Statistical analysis is fundamental not only to verify the validity of the experiment's results but also for enabling researchers to formulate reliable conclusions and contribute to broader scientific knowledge. It ensures the experiment findings are robust, accurate, and applicable within the context they were designed to examine.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Oil Leaders The table shows the world's five largest crude oil producing countries and their total oil output in percentage for the years 2011 and 2012 (www.whichcountry.co). Give two reasons why you should not do a chi-square test with these data.

Odd-Even Formula A survey was taken of a random sample of people noting their gender and asking whether they agreed with the Odd-Even Formula (OEF) to control the alarming levels of air pollution. Minitab results are shown. \(=1\) 2 Chi-square Test for Association: Opinion, Gender ciat:1 Rows: Ooinion Columns: Gender $$ \begin{array}{rr}\text { Male Female } \\ \text { Disagree } & 42 & 44 \\\ 42.17 & 43.83 \\ \text { Agree } & 11.4 & 86 \\ & 110 & 14.17 & \\ & 109.83 & \\ \mathrm{All} & & \\ & 152 & 158 & 310 \\ \text { Cel1 Contents: } & \text { Count } \\ & \text { Expected count } \\ \text { Pearson Chi-Square }=0.002, \mathrm{DF}=1, \text { p-value }=0.966\end{array} $$ a. Find the percentage of men and women in the sample who agreed with the OEF method, and compare these percentages. b. Test the hypothesis that opinions about OEF and gender are independent using a significance level of \(0.05\). c. Does this suggest that men and women have significantly different views about the OEF method?

Effect of Confederates on Compliance (Example 7) A study was done to see whether participants would ignore a sign that read, "Elevator may stick between floors. Use the stairs." The people who used the stairs were classified as compliant, those who used the elevator as noncompliant. The study was done in a university dorm on the ground floor of a building that had three floors. There were three different situations, two of which involved a person who was secretly working with the experimenter. (This person is called a confederate.) In the first situation, there was no other person using the stairs or elevator - that is, no confederate. In the second, there was a compliant confederate (one who used the stairs). In the third, there was a noncompliant confederate (one who used the elevator). Suppose that the participants (people who arrived to use the elevator at the time the experiment was going on) were randomly assigned to the three groups. There were significant differences between groups. a. Can we generalize widely to a large group? Why or why not? b. Can we infer causality? Why or why not?

Steroids and Height Does the use of inhaled steroids by children affect their height as adults? Excerpts from the abstract of a study about this are given. Read them and then answer the questions that follow. "Methods: We measured adult height in 943 of 1041 participants \((90.6 \%)\) in the Childhood Asthma Management Program; adult height was determined at a mean ( \(\pm \mathrm{SD}\) ) age of \(24.9 \pm 2.7\) years. Starting at the age of 5 to 13 years, the participants had been randomly assigned to receive \(400 \mu \mathrm{g}\) of budesonide, 16 \(\mathrm{mg}\) of nedocromil, or placebo daily for 4 to 6 years. Results: Mean adult height was \(1.2 \overline{\mathrm{cm}}\) lower \((95 \%\) confidence interval \([\mathrm{CI}],-1.9\) to \(-0.5\) ) in the budesonide group than in the placebo group \((\mathrm{P}=0.001)\) and was \(0.2 \mathrm{~cm}\) lower (95\% CI, \(-0.9\) to \(0.5\) ) in the nedocromil group than in the placebo group \((\mathrm{P}=0.61) . "\) a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain. c. Does the first interval, \((-1.9\) to \(-0.5\) ), capture 0 ? What does that show? d. From the interval, can you conclude that the use of budesonide in childhood reduces the heights of the children when they become adults? Why or why not? e. Does the second interval, \((-0.9\) to \(0.5\) ), capture 0 ? What does that show? f. From the interval, can you conclude that the use of nedocromil in childhood reduces the heights of the children when they become adults? Why or why not?

Drug for Asthma (Example 8) Eosinophils are a form of white blood cell that is often present in people suffering from allergies. People with asthma and high levels of eosinophils who used steroid inhalers were given either a new drug or a placebo. Read extracts from the abstract of this study that appear below, and then evaluate the study. See page 539 for questions and guidance. "Methods: We enrolled patients with persistent, moderate-tosevere asthma and a blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells per microliter ... who used medium-dose to high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids.... We administered dupilumab \((300 \mathrm{mg})\) or placebo subcutaneously once weekly. The primary end point was the occurrence of an asthma exacerbation [worsening]. Results: A total of 52 patients were [randomly] assigned to the dupilumab group, and 52 patients were [randomly] assigned to the placebo group..... Three patients had an asthma exacerbation with dupilumab \((6 \%)\) versus 23 with placebo \((44 \%)\), corresponding to an \(87 \%\) reduction with dupilumab (odds ratio, \(0.08 ; 95 \%\) confidence interval, \(0.02\) to \(0.28 ; \mathrm{P}<0.001)\). Conclusions: In patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe asthma and elevated eosinophil levels who used inhaled glucocorticoids and LABAs, dupilumab therapy, as compared with placebo, was associated with fewer asthma exacerbations [worsenings]."

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.