/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q4 Using Confidence Intervalsa. Ass... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Using Confidence Intervals

a. Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2. Which is better: A hypothesis test or a confidence interval?

b. In general, when dealing with inferences for two population proportions, which two of the following are equivalent: confidence interval method; P-value method; critical value method?

c. If we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2, what confidence level should we use?

d. If we test the claim in part (c) using the sample data in Exercise 1, we get this confidence interval: -0.000508 < p1 - p2 < - 0.000309. What does this confidence interval suggest about the claim?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. A hypothesis test is better than a confidence interval.

b. The p-value method and critical value method are equivalent.

c. The 90% confidence interval to test the claim is made about the difference between two population proportion .

d. The given confidence interval suggests that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that .

Step by step solution

01

Describe the methods of Inferences about two proportion.

a. The following methods can be used for comparing two population proportion:

1. Hypothesis test

2. Confidence Interval

The hypothesis test is used to test the claims about two population proportions. The confidence interval is used when estimating about the differences between two population proportions.

A hypothesis test is recommended for testing a claim at 0.05 level of significance.

Hence, in this case hypothesis test is better than confidence interval.

02

Check equivalency of three methods

b.In a hypothesis test, there are two methods to test the claims about population proportion,

1. P-value method

2. Critical value method

Both methods are used to test the claim made about two proportions. In p-value method, a probability value is compared to a significance level to make a decision while in critical value method, the test statistic is compared to critical value(s) to make a decision about hypotheses.

The method of confidence interval is used primarily to estimate the difference between two population proportions.

Thus, the P-value method and critical value method are equivalent.

03

State the confidence level

c. As per the table 8-1, for one tailed significance test at 0.05 level of significance, 90% confidence level is recommended.

04

Step 4:Make conclusion about the claim

d. Refer to exercise 1 for the claim stated as,

Ho:p1=p2Ha:p1<p2

Where p1,p2are population proportion of children who developed polio after vaccine and in control group respectively.

The given confidence interval is -0.000508<p1-p2<-0.000309.

This confidence does not contain zero. Thus, there is significant difference between two proportion p1andp2.

Therefore, the given confidence interval suggests that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that is p1less that p2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Eyewitness Accuracy of Police Does stress affect the recall ability of police eyewitnesses? This issue was studied in an experiment that tested eyewitness memory a week after a nonstressful interrogation of a cooperative suspect and a stressful interrogation of an uncooperative and belligerent suspect. The numbers of details recalled a week after the incident were recorded, and the summary statistics are given below (based on data from 鈥淓yewitness Memory of Police Trainees for Realistic Role Plays,鈥 by Yuille et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 6). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim in the article that 鈥渟tress decreases the amount recalled.鈥

Nonstress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 53.3, s = 11.6

Stress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 45.3, s = 13.2

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Overlap of Confidence Intervals In the article 鈥淥n Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals,鈥 by Schenker and Gentleman (American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 3), the authors consider sample data in this statement: 鈥淚ndependent simple random samples, each of size 200, have been drawn, and 112 people in the first sample have the attribute, whereas 88 people in the second sample have the attribute.鈥

a. Use the methods of this section to construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the difference p1-p2. What does the result suggest about the equality of p1andp2?

b. Use the methods of Section 7-1 to construct individual 95% confidence interval estimates for each of the two population proportions. After comparing the overlap between the two confidence intervals, what do you conclude about the equality ofp1andp2?

c. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two population proportions are equal. What do you conclude?

d. Based on the preceding results, what should you conclude about the equality ofp1andp2? Which of the three preceding methods is least effective in testing for the equality ofp1andp2?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

Question:Headache Treatment In a study of treatments for very painful 鈥渃luster鈥 headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from head- aches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from 鈥淗igh-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache,鈥 by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 302, No. 22). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn鈥檛 seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

First explore the two proportions of overtime wins. Does there appear to be a difference? If so, how?

Interpreting Displays.

In Exercises 5 and 6, use the results from the given displays.

Testing Laboratory Gloves, The New York Times published an article about a study by Professor Denise Korniewicz, and Johns Hopkins researched subjected laboratory gloves to stress. Among 240 vinyl gloves, 63% leaked viruses; among 240 latex gloves, 7% leaked viruses. See the accompanying display of the Statdisk results. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that vinyl gloves have a greater virus leak rate than latex gloves.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.