/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q4 Degrees of FreedomFor Example 1 ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 9: Q4 (page 438)

Degrees of Freedom

For Example 1 on page 431, we used df smaller of n1-1and n2-1, we got , and the corresponding critical values aret=卤2.201. If we calculate df using Formula 9-1, we getdf=19.063, and the corresponding critical values are t=卤2.201. How is using the critical values of more 鈥渃onservative鈥� than using the critical values of 卤2.093.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The formula used is simpler and less accurate as compared to the formula 9-1.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The formula used for degree of freedom of mean is:

df=minn1-1,n2-1 , the results are:

df=11, critical valuest=卤2.201

The formula used for degree of freedom for comparison of mean is:

df=s12n1+s22n22s12n12n1-1+s22n22n1-1, the results are:

When df=19.63, critical valuest=卤2.093

02

Explanation of the statement

The formula used to obtain the critical value 2.093 is obtained accurately:

The simpler formula df=minn1-1,n2-1can be used more easily and flexibly but may not be that accurate to give results.

Hence, the critical value obtained using df=minn1-1,n2-1is more conservative than the ones computed with another formula.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥�22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Are Seat Belts Effective? A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed (based on data from 鈥淲ho Wants Airbags?鈥� by Meyer and Finney, Chance, Vol. 18, No. 2). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. What does the result suggest about the effectiveness of seat belts?

In Exercises 5鈥�20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥� answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

IQ and Lead Exposure Data Set 7 鈥淚Q and Lead鈥� in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized below.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean IQ score of people with low blood lead levels is higher than the mean IQ score of people with high blood lead levels.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on IQ scores?

Low Blood Lead Level: n = 78, \(\bar x\) = 92.88462, s = 15.34451

High Blood Lead Level: n = 21,\(\bar x\)= 86.90476, s = 8.988352

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥�22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Cell Phones and Handedness A study was conducted to investigate the association between cell phone use and hemispheric brain dominance. Among 216 subjects who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones, 166 were right-handed. Among 452 subjects who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones, 436 were right-handed (based on data from 鈥淗emi- spheric Dominance and Cell Phone Use,鈥� by Seidman et al., JAMA Otolaryngology鈥擧ead & Neck Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 5). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones is less than the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones. (Try not to get too confused here.)

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥�22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Clinical Trials of OxyContin OxyContin (oxycodone) is a drug used to treat pain, butit is well known for its addictiveness and danger. In a clinical trial, among subjects treatedwith OxyContin, 52 developed nausea and 175 did not develop nausea. Among other subjectsgiven placebos, 5 developed nausea and 40 did not develop nausea (based on data from PurduePharma L.P.). Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a difference between the rates of nauseafor those treated with OxyContin and those given a placebo.

a. Use a hypothesis test.

b. Use an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Does nausea appear to be an adverse reaction resulting from OxyContin?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.