/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3FDD Critical Thinking: Did the NFL R... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn鈥檛 seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

What do you conclude about the effectiveness of the overtime rule change?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It can be concluded that the overtime change rule was not effective in reducing the number of overtime games that were won by the team that won the toss.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In the years between 1974 and 2011, out of 460 overtime games, 252 games were won by the team that won the coin toss.

In the first 3 years beginning from 2012, there were 47 overtime games and 24 of those games were won by the team that won the coin toss.

02

Conclusion about the effectiveness of the overtime rule change

The number of overtime games that were won by the team that won the toss before the overtime rule change was not significantly greater than the number of overtime games that were won by the team that won the toss after the overtime rule change

This was proved by conducting the hypothesis test as well as the confidence interval in the previous exercise 2FDD.

Thus, it can be concluded that the overtime change rule was not effective in lowering the number of games that were won because of practising the unfair procedure that was prevalent before the rule was changed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting Displays.

In Exercises 5 and 6, use the results from the given displays.

Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common wrist complaintresulting from a compressed nerve, and it is often the result of extended use of repetitive wristmovements, such as those associated with the use of a keyboard. In a randomized controlledtrial, 73 patients were treated with surgery and 67 were found to have successful treatments.Among 83 patients treated with splints, 60 were found to have successful treatments (based ondata from 鈥淪plinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome,鈥 by Gerritsenet al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 288, No. 10). Use the accompanyingStatCrunch display with a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the success rate is better with surgery.

We have specified a margin of error, a confidence level, and a likely range for the observed value of the sample proportion. For each exercise, obtain a sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified (provided of course that the observed value of the sample proportion is further from 0.5than the educated guess).Obtain a sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

marginoferror=0.04;confidencelevel=99%;likelyrange=0.7orless

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Bednets to Reduce Malaria In a randomized controlled trial in Kenya, insecticide-treated bednets were tested as a way to reduce malaria. Among 343 infants using bednets, 15 developed malaria. Among 294 infants not using bednets, 27 developed malaria (based on data from 鈥淪ustainability of Reductions in Malaria Transmission and Infant Mortality in Western Kenya with Use of Insecticide-Treated Bednets,鈥 by Lindblade et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 21). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, do the bednets appear to be effective?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is Echinacea Effective for Colds? Rhinoviruses typically cause common colds. In a test of the effectiveness of Echinacea, 40 of the 45 subjects treated with Echinacea developed rhinovirus infections. In a placebo group, 88 of the 103 subjects developed rhinovirus infections (based on data from 鈥淎n Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifolia in Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,鈥 by Turner et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 4). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does Echinacea appear to have any effect on the infection rate?

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

IQ and Lead Exposure Data Set 7 鈥淚Q and Lead鈥 in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized below.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean IQ score of people with low blood lead levels is higher than the mean IQ score of people with high blood lead levels.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on IQ scores?

Low Blood Lead Level: n = 78, \(\bar x\) = 92.88462, s = 15.34451

High Blood Lead Level: n = 21,\(\bar x\)= 86.90476, s = 8.988352

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.