/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q16BSC Testing Claims About Proportions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Bednets to Reduce Malaria In a randomized controlled trial in Kenya, insecticide-treated bednets were tested as a way to reduce malaria. Among 343 infants using bednets, 15 developed malaria. Among 294 infants not using bednets, 27 developed malaria (based on data from 鈥淪ustainability of Reductions in Malaria Transmission and Infant Mortality in Western Kenya with Use of Insecticide-Treated Bednets,鈥 by Lindblade et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 21). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, do the bednets appear to be effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.

The hypotheses are as follows.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {\rm{ }}{p_2}\end{array}\)

The test statistic is -2.4390. The p-value is 0.0073.The null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets.

b. The 99% confidence interval is\( - 0.0950 < \left( {{{\rm{p}}_1} - {{\rm{p}}_2}} \right) < - 0.0012\).Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets, as the null hypothesis is not included in the interval.

c. The result suggests that the bednets appear to be effective, as using bednets reduces the incidences of developing malaria significantly among infants as the interval is negative.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The trial is conducted to reduce malaria; the infants who developed malaria in 343 infants using bednets are 15 and the infants who developed malaria in 294 infants who did not use bednets are 27.

The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.01\) .

02

State the null and alternative hypotheses

Let\({p_1},{p_2}\)be the actual proportion of incidences of malaria in infants using bednets and without using bednets, respectively.

Test the claim that theincidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets using the following hypotheses.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {\rm{ }}{p_2}\end{array}\)

03

Compute the proportions

From the given information,

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 343\,\\{x_1} = 15\\{n_2} = 294\,\\{x_2} = 27\end{array}\)

The sample proportions are

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{{x_1}}}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{15}}{{343}}\\ = 0.0437\end{array}\]

and

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{{x_2}}}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{27}}{{294}}\\ = 0.0918\end{array}\].

04

Find the pooled sample proportions

The sample pooled proportions are calculated as

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar p = \frac{{\left( {{x_1} + {x_2}} \right)}}{{\left( {{n_1} + {n_2}} \right)}}\,\\ = \frac{{\left( {15 + 27} \right)}}{{\left( {343 + 294} \right)}}\\ = 0.0659\end{array}\]

and

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar q = 1 - \bar p\\ = 1 - 0.0659\\ = 0.9340\end{array}\).

05

Define the test statistic

To conduct a hypothesis test of two proportions, the test statistics is computed as follows.

\(z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} }}\,\]

Substitute the values. So,

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {0.0437 - 0.0918} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.0659 \times 0.9340}}{{343}} + \frac{{0.0659 \times 0.9340}}{{294}}} \right)} }}\\ = - 2.439\end{array}\].

The value of the test statistic is -2.44.

06

Find the p-value

Referring to the standard normal table for the negative z-score of 0.0073, the cumulative probability of -2.44 is obtained from the cell intersection for rows -2.4 and the column value 0.04.

For the left-tailed test, the p-value is the area to the left to the test statistic,

which is

\(P\left( {z < - 2.44} \right) = 0.0073\].

Thus, the p-value is 0.0073.

07

Conclusion from the hypothesis test

As the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidences of malaria are lower in infants using bednets.

08

Describe the confidence interval

b.

The general formula for the confidence interval of the difference of proportions is as follows.

\({\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E\,\,,\,\,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\,\]\(\).

Here, E is the margin of error, which is calculated as follows.

\(E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \]

09

Find the confidence interval

For the one-tailed test at a 0.01 significance level, the associated confidence interval is 98%.

For the critical value\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\], the cumulative area to its left is\(1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\).

Mathematically,

\(\begin{array}{c}P\left( {Z < {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}} \right) = 1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\\P\left( {Z < {z_{\frac{{0.02}}{2}}}} \right) = 0.99\end{array}\)

Refer to the standard normal table for the critical value. The area of 0.99 corresponds to row 2.33.

The margin of error E is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \\ = 2.33 \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.0437 \times 0.9563}}{{343}} + \frac{{0.0918 \times 0.9082}}{{294}}} \right)} \\ = 0.0469\end{array}\].

Substitute the value of E in the equation for the confidence interval. So,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{{\rm{\hat p}}}_1} - {{{\rm{\hat p}}}_2}} \right) - {\rm{E}}\,\,{\rm{,}}\,\,\left( {{{{\rm{\hat p}}}_1} - {{{\rm{\hat p}}}_2}} \right){\rm{ + E}}} \right)\\ = \left( {\left( {0.0437 - 0.0918} \right) - 0.04685\,,\,\,\left( {0.0437 - 0.0918} \right) + 0.04685} \right)\\ = \left( { - 0.0013\,\,,\, - 0.0950} \right)\end{array}\].

Thus, the 98% confidence interval for two proportions is\( - 0.0950 < \left( {{{\rm{p}}_1} - {{\rm{p}}_2}} \right) < - 0.0012\)

As 0 does not belong to the interval, the null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidences of malaria are lower in infants using bednets.

10

Conclude the results

c.

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidences of malaria are lower in infants using bednets.

From the results, it can be concluded that using bednets reduces the incidences of developing malaria significantly among infants as the interval is negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Overlap of Confidence Intervals In the article 鈥淥n Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals,鈥 by Schenker and Gentleman (American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 3), the authors consider sample data in this statement: 鈥淚ndependent simple random samples, each of size 200, have been drawn, and 112 people in the first sample have the attribute, whereas 88 people in the second sample have the attribute.鈥

a. Use the methods of this section to construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the difference\({p_1} - {p_2}\). What does the result suggest about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

b. Use the methods of Section 7-1 to construct individual 95% confidence interval estimates for each of the two population proportions. After comparing the overlap between the two confidence intervals, what do you conclude about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

c. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two population proportions are equal. What do you conclude?

d. Based on the preceding results, what should you conclude about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)? Which of the three preceding methods is least effective in testing for the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

Notation for the sample data given in exercise 1, consider the salk vaccine treatment group to be the first sample. Identify the values of n1,p^1,q^1,n2,p^2,q^2,pand q. Round all values so that they have six significant digits.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Dreaming in Black and White A study was conducted to determine the proportion of people who dream in black and white instead of color. Among 306 people over the age of 55, 68 dream in black and white, and among 298 people under the age of 25, 13 dream in black and white (based on data from 鈥淒o We Dream in Color?鈥 by Eva Murzyn, Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 17, No. 4). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion of those under 25.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. An explanation given for the results is that those over the age of 55 grew up exposed to media that was mostly displayed in black and white. Can the results from parts (a) and (b) be used to verify that explanation?

Confidence Interval for Haemoglobin

Large samples of women and men are obtained, and the haemoglobin level is measured in each subject. Here is the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two population means, where the measures from women correspond to population 1 and the measures from men correspond to population 2:\(\)\( - 1.76g/dL < {\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 1.62g/dL\).

a. What does the confidence interval suggest about equality of the mean hemoglobin level in women and the mean hemoglobin level in men?

b. Write a brief statement that interprets that confidence interval.

c. Express the confidence interval with measures from men being population 1 and measures from women being population 2.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.