/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q16BSC Testing Claims About Proportions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Bednets to Reduce Malaria In a randomized controlled trial in Kenya, insecticide-treated bednets were tested as a way to reduce malaria. Among 343 infants using bednets, 15 developed malaria. Among 294 infants not using bednets, 27 developed malaria (based on data from 鈥淪ustainability of Reductions in Malaria Transmission and Infant Mortality in Western Kenya with Use of Insecticide-Treated Bednets,鈥 by Lindblade et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 21). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, do the bednets appear to be effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.

The hypotheses are as follows.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {\rm{ }}{p_2}\end{array}\)

The test statistic is -2.4390. The p-value is 0.0073.The null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets.

b. The 99% confidence interval is\( - 0.0950 < \left( {{{\rm{p}}_1} - {{\rm{p}}_2}} \right) < - 0.0012\).Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets, as the null hypothesis is not included in the interval.

c. The result suggests that the bednets appear to be effective, as using bednets reduces the incidences of developing malaria significantly among infants as the interval is negative.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The trial is conducted to reduce malaria; the infants who developed malaria in 343 infants using bednets are 15 and the infants who developed malaria in 294 infants who did not use bednets are 27.

The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.01\) .

02

State the null and alternative hypotheses

Let\({p_1},{p_2}\)be the actual proportion of incidences of malaria in infants using bednets and without using bednets, respectively.

Test the claim that theincidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets using the following hypotheses.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {\rm{ }}{p_2}\end{array}\)

03

Compute the proportions

From the given information,

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 343\,\\{x_1} = 15\\{n_2} = 294\,\\{x_2} = 27\end{array}\)

The sample proportions are

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{{x_1}}}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{15}}{{343}}\\ = 0.0437\end{array}\]

and

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{{x_2}}}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{27}}{{294}}\\ = 0.0918\end{array}\].

04

Find the pooled sample proportions

The sample pooled proportions are calculated as

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar p = \frac{{\left( {{x_1} + {x_2}} \right)}}{{\left( {{n_1} + {n_2}} \right)}}\,\\ = \frac{{\left( {15 + 27} \right)}}{{\left( {343 + 294} \right)}}\\ = 0.0659\end{array}\]

and

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar q = 1 - \bar p\\ = 1 - 0.0659\\ = 0.9340\end{array}\).

05

Define the test statistic

To conduct a hypothesis test of two proportions, the test statistics is computed as follows.

\(z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} }}\,\]

Substitute the values. So,

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {0.0437 - 0.0918} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.0659 \times 0.9340}}{{343}} + \frac{{0.0659 \times 0.9340}}{{294}}} \right)} }}\\ = - 2.439\end{array}\].

The value of the test statistic is -2.44.

06

Find the p-value

Referring to the standard normal table for the negative z-score of 0.0073, the cumulative probability of -2.44 is obtained from the cell intersection for rows -2.4 and the column value 0.04.

For the left-tailed test, the p-value is the area to the left to the test statistic,

which is

\(P\left( {z < - 2.44} \right) = 0.0073\].

Thus, the p-value is 0.0073.

07

Conclusion from the hypothesis test

As the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidences of malaria are lower in infants using bednets.

08

Describe the confidence interval

b.

The general formula for the confidence interval of the difference of proportions is as follows.

\({\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E\,\,,\,\,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\,\]\(\).

Here, E is the margin of error, which is calculated as follows.

\(E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \]

09

Find the confidence interval

For the one-tailed test at a 0.01 significance level, the associated confidence interval is 98%.

For the critical value\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\], the cumulative area to its left is\(1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\).

Mathematically,

\(\begin{array}{c}P\left( {Z < {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}} \right) = 1 - \frac{\alpha }{2}\\P\left( {Z < {z_{\frac{{0.02}}{2}}}} \right) = 0.99\end{array}\)

Refer to the standard normal table for the critical value. The area of 0.99 corresponds to row 2.33.

The margin of error E is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \\ = 2.33 \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.0437 \times 0.9563}}{{343}} + \frac{{0.0918 \times 0.9082}}{{294}}} \right)} \\ = 0.0469\end{array}\].

Substitute the value of E in the equation for the confidence interval. So,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{{\rm{\hat p}}}_1} - {{{\rm{\hat p}}}_2}} \right) - {\rm{E}}\,\,{\rm{,}}\,\,\left( {{{{\rm{\hat p}}}_1} - {{{\rm{\hat p}}}_2}} \right){\rm{ + E}}} \right)\\ = \left( {\left( {0.0437 - 0.0918} \right) - 0.04685\,,\,\,\left( {0.0437 - 0.0918} \right) + 0.04685} \right)\\ = \left( { - 0.0013\,\,,\, - 0.0950} \right)\end{array}\].

Thus, the 98% confidence interval for two proportions is\( - 0.0950 < \left( {{{\rm{p}}_1} - {{\rm{p}}_2}} \right) < - 0.0012\)

As 0 does not belong to the interval, the null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidences of malaria are lower in infants using bednets.

10

Conclude the results

c.

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the incidences of malaria are lower in infants using bednets.

From the results, it can be concluded that using bednets reduces the incidences of developing malaria significantly among infants as the interval is negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determining Sample Size The sample size needed to estimate the difference between two population proportions to within a margin of error E with a confidence level of 1 - a can be found by using the following expression:

E=z2p1q1n1+p2q2n2

Replace n1andn2 by n in the preceding formula (assuming that both samples have the same size) and replace each of role="math" localid="1649424190272" p1,q1,p2andq2by 0.5 (because their values are not known). Solving for n results in this expression:

n=z222E2

Use this expression to find the size of each sample if you want to estimate the difference between the proportions of men and women who own smartphones. Assume that you want 95% confidence that your error is no more than 0.03.

True?For the methods of this section, which of the following statements are true?

a.When testing a claim with ten matched pairs of heights, hypothesis tests using the P-valuemethod, critical value method, and confidence interval method will all result in the same conclusion.

b.The methods of this section are robustagainst departures from normality, which means that the distribution of sample differences must be very close to a normal distribution.

c.If we want to use a confidence interval to test the claim that\({{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{d}}}{\bf{ < 0}}\)with a 0.01 significancelevel, the confidence interval should have a confidence level of 98%.

d.The methods of this section can be used with annual incomes of 50 randomly selected attorneysin North Carolina and 50 randomly selected attorneys in South Carolina.

e.With ten matched pairs of heights, the methods of this section require that we use n= 20.

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

Seat Belts A study of seat belt use involved children who were hospitalized after motor vehicle crashes. For a group of 123 children who were wearing seat belts, the number of days in intensive care units (ICU) has a mean of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 1.77. For a group of 290 children who were not wearing seat belts, the number of days spent in ICUs has a mean of 1.39 and a standard deviation of 3.06 (based on data from 鈥淢orbidity Among Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Victims: The Effectiveness of Seat Belts,鈥 by Osberg and Di Scala, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that children wearing seat belts have a lower mean length of time in an ICU than the mean for children not wearing seat belts.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What important conclusion do the results suggest?

Heights of PresidentsA popular theory is that presidential candidates have an advantage if they are taller than their main opponents. Listed are heights (cm) of presidents along with the heights of their main opponents (from Data Set 15 鈥淧residents鈥).

a.Use the sample data with a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that for the population of heights of presidents and their main opponents, the differences have a mean greater than 0 cm.

b.Construct the confidence interval that could be used for the hypothesis test described in part (a). What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion reached in part (a)?

Height (cm) of President

185

178

175

183

193

173

Height (cm) of Main Opponent

171

180

173

175

188

178

Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Hemoglobin

a. Exercise 2 includes a confidence interval. If you use the P-value method or the critical value method from Part 1 of this section to test the claim that women and men have the same mean hemoglobin levels, will the hypothesis tests and the confidence interval result in the same conclusion?

b. In general, if you conduct a hypothesis test using the methods of Part 1 of this section, will the P-value method, the critical value method, and the confidence interval method result in the same conclusion?

c. Assume that you want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean haemoglobin level in women is lessthan the mean hemoglobin level in men. What confidence level should be used if you want to test that claim using a confidence interval?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.