/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q19 Testing Claims About Proportions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

Question:Headache Treatment In a study of treatments for very painful 鈥渃luster鈥 headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from head- aches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from 鈥淗igh-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache,鈥 by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 302, No. 22). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The null hypothesis is rejected; thus, there is sufficient evidence to claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

b. The 98% confidence interval is equal to.

c. Yes, the oxygen treatment is effective in curing cluster headaches.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A sample of 150 patients was treated with oxygen, and among them, 116 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment. Another sample of 148 patients was given a placebo, and among them, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment. The significance level is =0.01.

02

Describe the hypotheses 

It is claimed that oxygen treatment is effective; that is, the proportion of patients free from headache after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients free from headache after receiving a placebo.

Since the given claim does not have an equality sign, the following hypotheses are set up:

Null Hypothesis: The proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is equal to theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

H0:p1=p2

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after placebo treatment.

H1:p1>p2

The test is right-tailed.

03

Important values

Let p^1denote the sampleproportion of patients free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment.

p^1=x1n1=116150=0.7733

Let p^2denote the sampleproportionof patients free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

p^2=x2n2=29148=0.1959

The sample size of patients who weretreated with oxygen treatment n1is equal to 150.

The sample size of patients who weretreated with a placebon2 is equal to 148.

The value of the pooled sample proportion is computed as follows:

p=x1+x2n1+n2=116+29150+148=0.4866

and

q=1-p=1-0.4866=0.5134

04

Find the test statistic

The test statistic is computed as follows:

z=p^1-p^2-p1-p2pqn1+pqn2=0.7733-0.1959-00.48660.5134150+0.48660.5134148=9.971

The value of the test statistic is 9.971.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the critical value of z corresponding to=0.01 for a right-tailed test is equal to 2.33.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding p-value is equal to 0.0001.

Since the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

Conclusion of the test

a.

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that theproportion of patients who were free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients who were free from headache 15 minutes after placebo treatment.

06

Find the confidence interval

b.

The general formula for the confidence interval of difference of proportion is written below:

ConfidenceInterval=p^1-p^2-E,p^1-p^2+E...1

Where, E is the margin of error and has the following formula:

E=z2p^1q^1n1+p^2q^2n2

For computing the confidence interval, first find the critical value z2.

The confidence level is 98% if the level of significance used in the one-railed test is 0.01 (part a.).

Thus, the value of the level of significance for the confidence interval becomes =0.02.

Hence,

2=0.022=0.01

The value of z2form the standard normal table is equal to 2.33.

Now, the margin of error (E) is equal to:

E=z2p^1q^1n1+p^2q^2n2=2.330.77330.2267150+0.19590.8041148=0.1101

Substitute the value of E in equation (1) as follows:

ConfidenceInterval=p^1-p^2-E,p^1-p^2+E=0.7733-0.1959-0.1101,0.7733-0.1959+0.1101=0.467,0.687

Thus, the 98% confidence interval for the difference between two proportions is.

Since the confidence interval does not include the value of 0 and includes all positive values, it can be concluded that the proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

07

Effectiveness of the treatment

c.

From the results, it can be concluded thatthe oxygen treatment is effective because the proportion of patients free from headache after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients free from headache after receiving a placebo.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as 鈥渓ess than 0.001,鈥 what should we conclude about the original claim?

esting Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Accuracy of Fast Food Drive-Through Orders In a study of Burger King drive-through orders, it was found that 264 orders were accurate and 54 were not accurate. For McDonald鈥檚, 329 orders were found to be accurate while 33 orders were not accurate (based on data from QSR magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Burger King and McDonald鈥檚 have the same accuracy rates.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Relative to accuracy of orders, does either restaurant chain appear to be better?

Using Confidence Intervals

a. Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2. Which is better: A hypothesis test or a confidence interval?

b. In general, when dealing with inferences for two population proportions, which two of the following are equivalent: confidence interval method; P-value method; critical value method?

c. If we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2, what confidence level should we use?

d. If we test the claim in part (c) using the sample data in Exercise 1, we get this confidence interval: -0.000508 < p1 - p2 < - 0.000309. What does this confidence interval suggest about the claim?

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from 鈥淏ipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,鈥 by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).) Bad Stuff in Children鈥檚 Movies Data Set 11 鈥淎lcohol and Tobacco in Movies鈥 in Appendix B includes lengths of times (seconds) of tobacco use shown in animated children鈥檚 movies. For the Disney movies, n = 33,\(\bar x\)= 61.6 sec, s = 118.8 sec. For the other movies, n = 17,\(\bar x\)= 49.3 sec, s = 69.3 sec. The sorted times for the non-Disney movies are listed below.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Disney animated children鈥檚 movies and other animated children鈥檚 movies have the same mean time showing tobacco use.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Conduct a quick visual inspection of the listed times for the non-Disney movies and comment on the normality requirement. How does the normality of the 17 non-Disney times affect the results?

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 17 24 55 91 117 155 162 205

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.