/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10BSC IQ and Lead Exposure Data Set 7 ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

IQ and Lead Exposure Data Set 7 鈥淚Q and Lead鈥 in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized on the top of the next page. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that IQ scores of people with low lead

levels vary more than IQ scores of people with high lead levels.

Low Lead Level: n = 78, \(\bar x\) = 92.88462, s = 15.34451

High Lead Level: n = 21, \(\bar x\) = 86.90476, s = 8.988352

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to support the claim that IQ scores of people with low lead levels vary more than IQ scores of people with high lead levels.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

For a sample of 78 IQ scores with low blood lead levels, the mean value equals92.88462,and the standard deviation equals15.34451. In another sample of 21 IQ scores with high blood lead levels, the mean valueequals86.90476,and the standard deviationequals8.988352.

It is claimed that the variation in the IQ scores for low blood lead levels is more than the variation in the IQ scores for high blood lead levels.

02

Hypotheses

Let\({\sigma _1}\)and\({\sigma _2}\)be the population standard deviationsof the IQ scores for low blood lead levels high blood lead levels,respectively.

Nullhypothesis:The population standard deviation of the IQ scores for low blood lead levels is more than the variation in the IQ scores for high blood lead levels.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)

State the alternate hypotheses.

Since the original claim does not include equality, the alternate hypothesis\({H_1}\)represents the population variance of the low lead level is greater than the population variance of the high lead level.

Symbolically,

\({H_1}:{\sigma _1} > {\sigma _2}\)

03

Compute the test statistic for the t-test.

Since two independent samples involve a claim about the population standard deviation, apply an F-test.

Consider the larger sample variance to be\(s_1^2\)and the corresponding sample size to be\({n_1}\).

The following values are obtained:

\({\left( {15.34451} \right)^2} = 235.454\)

\({\left( {8.988352} \right)^2} = 80.790\)

Here,\(s_1^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to low blood lead levels and has a value equal to 235.454.

\(s_2^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to high blood lead levels and has a value equal to 80.790.

Substitute the respective values to calculate the F statistic:

\(\begin{array}{c}F = \frac{{{{\left( {15.34451} \right)}^2}}}{{{{\left( {8.988352} \right)}^2}}}\\ = 2.914\end{array}\)

Thus, F is equal to 2.914.

04

Critical value and p-value

The value of the numerator degrees of freedom is equal tothe following:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_1} - 1 = 78 - 1\\ = 77\end{array}\)

The value of the denominator degrees of freedom is equal tothe following:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_2} - 1 = 21 - 1\\ = 20\end{array}\)

For the F test, the critical value corresponding to the right-tail is considered.

The critical value can be obtained using the F-distribution table with numerator degrees of freedom equal to 77 and denominator degrees of freedom equal to 20 for a right-tailed test.

The level of significance is equal to 0.05.

Thus, the critical value is equal to 1.9246.

The two-tailed p-value for F equal to 2.914 is equal to 0.0045.

05

Conclusion

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Thus, there is enough evidence to supportthe claimthat IQ scores of people with low lead levels vary more than IQ scores of people with high lead levels.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Cell Phones and Handedness A study was conducted to investigate the association between cell phone use and hemispheric brain dominance. Among 216 subjects who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones, 166 were right-handed. Among 452 subjects who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones, 436 were right-handed (based on data from 鈥淗emi- spheric Dominance and Cell Phone Use,鈥 by Seidman et al., JAMA Otolaryngology鈥擧ead & Neck Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 5). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones is less than the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones. (Try not to get too confused here.)

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Accuracy of Fast Food Drive-Through Orders In a study of Burger King drive-through orders, it was found that 264 orders were accurate and 54 were not accurate. For McDonald鈥檚, 329 orders were found to be accurate while 33 orders were not accurate (based on data from QSR magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Burger King and McDonald鈥檚 have the same accuracy rates.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Relative to accuracy of orders, does either restaurant chain appear to be better?

Denomination Effect Construct the confidence interval that could be used to test the claim in Exercise 1. What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion from Exercise 1?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Clinical Trials of OxyContin OxyContin (oxycodone) is a drug used to treat pain, butit is well known for its addictiveness and danger. In a clinical trial, among subjects treatedwith OxyContin, 52 developed nausea and 175 did not develop nausea. Among other subjectsgiven placebos, 5 developed nausea and 40 did not develop nausea (based on data from PurduePharma L.P.). Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a difference between the rates of nauseafor those treated with OxyContin and those given a placebo.

a. Use a hypothesis test.

b. Use an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Does nausea appear to be an adverse reaction resulting from OxyContin?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is Echinacea Effective for Colds? Rhinoviruses typically cause common colds. In a test of the effectiveness of Echinacea, 40 of the 45 subjects treated with Echinacea developed rhinovirus infections. In a placebo group, 88 of the 103 subjects developed rhinovirus infections (based on data from 鈥淎n Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifolia in Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,鈥 by Turner et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 4). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does Echinacea appear to have any effect on the infection rate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.