/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q19BSC In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).) Is Old Faithful Not Quite So Faithful? Listed below are time intervals (min) between eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser. The 鈥渞ecent鈥 times are within the past few years, and the 鈥減ast鈥 times are from 1995. Does it appear that the mean time interval has changed? Is the conclusion affected by whether the significance level is 0.05 or 0.01?

Recent

78

91

89

79

57

100

62

87

70

88

82

83

56

81

74

102

61

Past

89

88

97

98

64

85

85

96

87

95

90

95

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean time interval between eruptions has changed at a 0.05 level of significance.

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean time interval between eruptions has changed at a 0.01 level of significance.

The conclusion of the claim is affected by the change in the significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The past and recent time intervals (min) between eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser are listed in the table.

02

Formulation of the hypotheses

Null hypothesis:The past mean time interval between eruptions is equalto the recent mean time interval between eruptions.

\({H_0}\):\({\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\)

Alternative hypothesis:The past mean time interval between eruptions is not equal to the recent mean time interval between eruptions.

\({H_1}\):\({\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\)

03

Calculation of the sample means

The recent mean time interval between eruptions is equal to the following:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{78 + 91 + .... + 61}}{{17}}\\ = 78.82\end{array}\)

Therefore, the recent mean time interval between eruptions equals78.82 minutes.

The past mean time interval between eruptions equalsthe following:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{89 + 88 + ... + 95}}{{12}}\\ = 89.08\end{array}\)

Therefore, the past mean time interval between eruptions equals89.08 minutes.

04

Calculation of the sample standard deviations

The standard deviation of the recent time interval between eruptions is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_1})}^2}} }}{{{n_1} - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {78 - 78.82} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {91 - 78.82} \right)}^2} + .... + {{\left( {61 - 78.82} \right)}^2}}}{{17 - 1}}} \\ = 13.97\end{array}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation of the recent time interval between eruptions equals 13.97 minutes.

The standard deviation for the past time interval between eruptions is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_2})}^2}} }}{{{n_2} - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {89 - 89.08} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {88 - 89.08} \right)}^2} + .... + {{\left( {95 - 89.08} \right)}^2}}}{{12 - 1}}} \\ = 9.19\end{array}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation of the past time interval between eruptions is equal to 9.19 minutes.

05

Calculation of the test statistic

Under the null hypothesis,\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\).

The test statistic is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {78.82 - 89.08} \right) - \left( 0 \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {13.97} \right)}^2}}}{{17}} + \frac{{{{\left( {9.19} \right)}^2}}}{{12}}} }}\\ = - 2.385\end{array}\)

Thus, the value of the test statistic is -2.385.

06

Computation of critical value

Degrees of freedom: The smaller of the two values,\(\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)\)and\(\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)\)is considered as the degreesof freedom.

\(\begin{array}{c}\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right) = \left( {17 - 1} \right)\\ = 16\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right) = \left( {12 - 1} \right)\\ = 11\end{array}\)

The value of the degrees of freedom is the minimum of (16,11) equal to 11.

Now see the t-distribution table for a two-tailed test with a 0.05 level of significance and 11 degrees of freedom.

The critical values are -2.201 and 2.201. The corresponding p-value is equal to 0.0362.

The value of the test statistic does not lie between the values -2.201 and 2.201 and the p-value is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected at a 0.05 significance level.

07

Conclusion of the test

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean time interval between eruptions has changed at a 0.05 level of significance.

08

Changing the level of significance

Let the level of significance be equal to 0.01.

Referring to the t-distribution table, the critical values of t at\(\alpha = 0.01\) with 11 degrees of freedom for a two-tailed test are -3.1058 and 3.1058.

The p-value remains the same and is equal to 0.0362.

The test statistic value equal to -2.385 lies between the two critical values, and the p-value is greater than 0.01.

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean time interval between eruptions has changed at a 0.01 level of significance.

Thus, the conclusion of the claim changes with the change in the significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Variation of Heights Use the sample data given in Exercise 3 鈥淗eights鈥 and test the claim that women and men have heights with the same variation. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Bednets to Reduce Malaria In a randomized controlled trial in Kenya, insecticide-treated bednets were tested as a way to reduce malaria. Among 343 infants using bednets, 15 developed malaria. Among 294 infants not using bednets, 27 developed malaria (based on data from 鈥淪ustainability of Reductions in Malaria Transmission and Infant Mortality in Western Kenya with Use of Insecticide-Treated Bed nets,鈥 by Lind blade et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 21). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bed nets.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, do the bed nets appear to be effective?

Family Heights. In Exercises 1鈥5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Confidence Interval Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean height of sons. Write a brief statement that interprets the confidence interval.

Before/After Treatment Results Captopril is a drug designed to lower systolic blood pressure. When subjects were treated with this drug, their systolic blood pressure readings (in mm Hg) were measured before and after the drug was taken. Results are given in the accompanying table (based on data from 鈥淓ssential Hypertension: Effect of an Oral Inhibitor of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme,鈥 by MacGregor et al., British Medical Journal, Vol. 2). Using a 0.01 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that captopril is effective in lowering systolic blood pressure?

Subject

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

Before

200

174

198

170

179

182

193

209

185

155

169

210

After

191

170

177

167

159

151

176

183

159

145

146

177

We have specified a margin of error, a confidence level, and a likely range for the observed value of the sample proportion. For each exercise, obtain a sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified (provided of course that the observed value of the sample proportion is further from 0.5than the educated guess).Obtain a sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

marginoferror=0.04;confidencelevel=99%;likelyrange=0.7orless

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.