/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q1FDD Critical Thinking: Is the pain m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Critical Thinking: Is the pain medicine Duragesic effective in reducing pain? Listed below are measures of pain intensity before and after using the drug Duragesic (fentanyl) (based on data from Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.). The data are listed in order by row, and corresponding measures are from the same subject before and after treatment. For example, the first subject had a measure of 1.2 before treatment and a measure of 0.4 after treatment. Each pair of measurements is from one subject, and the intensity of pain was measured using the standard visual analog score. A higher score corresponds to higher pain intensity.

Pain Intensity Before Duragesic Treatment

1.2

1.3

1.5

1.6

8

3.4

3.5

2.8

2.6

2.2

3

7.1

2.3

2.1

3.4

6.4

5

4.2

2.8

3.9

5.2

6.9

6.9

5

5.5

6

5.5

8.6

9.4

10

7.6










Pain Intensity After Duragesic Treatment

0.4

1.4

1.8

2.9

6

1.4

0.7

3.9

0.9

1.8

0.9

9.3

8

6.8

2.3

0.4

0.7

1.2

4.5

2

1.6

2

2

6.8

6.6

4.1

4.6

2.9

5.4

4.8

4.1










Correlation Use the given data to construct a scatterplot, then use the methods of Section 10-1 to test for a linear correlation between the pain intensity before and after treatment. If there does appear to be a linear correlation, can we conclude that the drug treatment is effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The scatterplot between the two pain intensity value is constructed below:

The value of the linear correlation is equal to 0.304.

The linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment is not significant.

No, it cannot be concluded that the drug is effective in reducing pain even if there was a significant linear correlation between the two pain intensities.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The pain intensities of a group of subjects are recorded before using the drug Duragesic and after using the drug Duragesic.

02

Construction of scatterplot

Follow the given steps to construct a scatterplot between the pain intensities before and after the treatment:

  • Mark the values 0, 2, 4, 鈥︹., 12 on the horizontal scale and label the axis as 鈥淧ain Intensity Before Treatment鈥.
  • Mark the values 0, 1, 2, 鈥︹., 10 on the vertical scale and label the axis as 鈥淧ain Intensity After Treatment鈥.
  • Plot points on the graph for each value of the pain intensity after treatment for the corresponding value on the pain intensity before treatment.

The following scatterplot is constructed:

The points on the plot appear to be scattered randomly, indicating that there is not a significant linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment.

03

Correlation coefficient

Let x denote the values of the pain intensity before treatment.

Let y denote the values of the pain intensity after treatment.

The formula for computing the correlation coefficient (r) between the values of x and y is as follows:

\(r = \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\)

The following calculations are done to compute the value of r:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

\({y^2}\)

1.2

0.4

0.48

1.44

0.16

1.3

1.4

1.82

1.69

1.96

1.5

1.8

2.7

2.25

3.24

1.6

2.9

4.64

2.56

8.41

8

6

48

64

36

3.4

1.4

4.76

11.56

1.96

3.5

0.7

2.45

12.25

0.49

2.8

3.9

10.92

7.84

15.21

2.6

0.9

2.34

6.76

0.81

2.2

1.8

3.96

4.84

3.24

3

0.9

2.7

9

0.81

7.1

9.3

66.03

50.41

86.49

2.3

8

18.4

5.29

64

2.1

6.8

14.28

4.41

46.24

3.4

2.3

7.82

11.56

5.29

6.4

0.4

2.56

40.96

0.16

5

0.7

3.5

25

0.49

4.2

1.2

5.04

17.64

1.44

2.8

4.5

12.6

7.84

20.25

3.9

2

7.8

15.21

4

5.2

1.6

8.32

27.04

2.56

6.9

2

13.8

47.61

4

6.9

2

13.8

47.61

4

5

6.8

34

25

46.24

5.5

6.6

36.3

30.25

43.56

6

4.1

24.6

36

16.81

5.5

4.6

25.3

30.25

21.16

8.6

2.9

24.94

73.96

8.41

9.4

5.4

50.76

88.36

29.16

10

4.8

48

100

23.04

7.6

4.1

31.16

57.76

16.81

\(\sum x \)=144.9

\(\sum y \)=102.2

\(\sum {xy} \)=533.78

\(\sum {{x^2}} \)=866.35

\(\sum {{y^2}} \)=516.4

Substituting the above values, the following value of r is obtained:

\(\begin{aligned} r &= \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= \frac{{31\left( {533.78} \right) - \left( {144.9} \right)\left( {102.2} \right)}}{{\sqrt {31\left( {866.35} \right) - {{\left( {144.9} \right)}^2}} \sqrt {31\left( {516.4} \right) - {{\left( {102.2} \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= 0.304\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of r is equal to 0.304.

04

Significance of r

Here, n=31.

If the value of the correlation coefficient lies between the critical values, then the correlation between the two variables is considered insignificant else, it is considered significant.

The critical values of r for n=31 and\(\alpha = 0.05\)are -0.355 and 0.355.

The corresponding p-value of r is equal to 0.0964.

Since the computed value of r equal to 0.304 lies between the values -0.355 and 0.355, and the p-value is greater than 0.05, it can be said that the correlation between the two variables is not significant.

Therefore, the linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment is not significant.

05

Effectiveness of the drug

Even if there is a significant linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment, it could not be concluded that the drug is effective in reducing pain. The linear correlation only tells us about the association between the two variables and not about the difference in the values of the two variables and whether the overall value of one variable is lower than the other variable.

A separate kind of hypothesis test needs to be conducted to conclude the effectiveness of the drug.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5鈥8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Crickets and Temperature r = 0.874 (x = number of cricket chirps in 1 minute, y = temperature in 掳F)

In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 鈥淐ar Measurements鈥 in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi/gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi/gal).

If only one predictor (x) variable is used to predict the city fuel consumption, which single variable is best? Why?

Super Bowl and\({R^2}\)Let x represent years coded as 1, 2, 3, . . . for years starting in 1980, and let y represent the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl from 1980. Using the data from 1980 to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing, we obtain the following values of\({R^2}\)for the different models: linear: 0.147; quadratic: 0.255; logarithmic: 0.176; exponential: 0.175; power: 0.203. Based on these results, which model is best? Is the best model a good model? What do the results suggest about predicting the number of points scored in a future Super Bowl game?

Critical Thinking: Is the pain medicine Duragesic effective in reducing pain? Listed below are measures of pain intensity before and after using the drug Duragesic (fentanyl) (based on data from Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.). The data are listed in order by row, and corresponding measures are from the same subject before and after treatment. For example, the first subject had a measure of 1.2 before treatment and a measure of 0.4 after treatment. Each pair of measurements is from one subject, and the intensity of pain was measured using the standard visual analog score. A higher score corresponds to higher pain intensity.

Pain Intensity Before Duragesic Treatment

1.2

1.3

1.5

1.6

8

3.4

3.5

2.8

2.6

2.2

3

7.1

2.3

2.1

3.4

6.4

5

4.2

2.8

3.9

5.2

6.9

6.9

5

5.5

6

5.5

8.6

9.4

10

7.6










Pain Intensity After Duragesic Treatment

0.4

1.4

1.8

2.9

6

1.4

0.7

3.9

0.9

1.8

0.9

9.3

8

6.8

2.3

0.4

0.7

1.2

4.5

2

1.6

2

2

6.8

6.6

4.1

4.6

2.9

5.4

4.8

4.1










Matched Pairs The methods of Section 9-3 can be used to test a claim about matched data. Identify the specific claim that the treatment is effective, then use the methods of Section 9-3 to test that claim.

In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 鈥淐ar Measurements鈥 in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi/gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi/gal).

Which regression equation is best for predicting city fuel consumption? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.