/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q1RE Cigarette Tar and Nicotine The t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Cigarette Tar and Nicotine The table below lists measured amounts (mg) of tar, carbonmonoxide (CO), and nicotine in king size cigarettes of different brands (from Data Set 13鈥淐igarette Contents鈥 in Appendix B).

a. Is there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between tar and nicotine?

b. What percentage of the variation in nicotine can be explained by the linear correlation between nicotine and tar?

c. Letting yrepresent the amount of nicotine and letting xrepresent the amount of tar, identify the regression equation.

d. The Raleigh brand king size cigarette is not included in the table, and it has 23 mg of tar. What is the best predicted amount of nicotine? How does the predicted amount compare to the actual amount of 1.3 mg of nicotine?

Tar

25

27

20

24

20

20

21

24

CO

18

16

16

16

16

16

14

17

Nicotine

1.5

1.7

1.1

1.6

1.1

1.0

1.2

1.4

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The value of r is 0.962. There is sufficient evidence to claim that there is a linear correlation between the amount of Tar and Nicotine (mg).

b.The percentage of the variation in nicotine can be explained by the linear correlation between nicotine and tar is 92.5%.

c. The regression equation is\(\hat y = - 0.757 + 0.0920x\).

d. The predicted amount of nicotine is 1.4 mg. Also, the predicted amount of nicotine (1.4 mg) is very close to the actual amount of nicotine (1.3 mg).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The table representing the amount of Cigarette Tar and Nicotine is provided.

02

Calculate the correlation coefficient

a.

Let x represents the amount of Tar (mg).

Let y represent the amount of Nicotine (mg).

The formula for computing the correlation coefficient (r) between the values of Nicotine (mg)and Carbon monoxide (mg)is as follows:

\(r = \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\)

The following calculations are done to compute the value of r:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

\({y^2}\)

25

1.5

37.5

625

2.25

27

1.7

45.9

729

2.89

20

1.1

22

400

1.21

24

1.6

38.4

576

2.56

20

1.1

22

400

1.21

20

1

20

400

1

21

1.2

25.2

441

1.44

24

1.4

33.6

576

1.96

\(\sum x \)=181

\(\sum y \)=10.6

\(\sum {xy} \)=244.6

\(\sum {{x^2}} \)=4147

\(\sum {{y^2}} \)=14.52

Substituting the above values, the value of r is obtained as,

\(\begin{aligned} r &= \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= \frac{{8\left( {244.6} \right) - \left( {181} \right)\left( {10.6} \right)}}{{\sqrt {8\left( {4147} \right) - {{\left( {181} \right)}^2}} \sqrt {8\left( {14.52} \right) - {{\left( {10.6} \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= 0.962\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of r is equal to 0.962.

03

Significance of r

Here, n=8.

If the value of the correlation coefficient lies between the critical values, then the correlation between the two variables is considered significant else, it is considered insignificant.

The critical values of r for n=8 and \(\alpha = 0.05\) are -0.707 and 0.707.

The corresponding p-value of r is equal to 0.000.

Since the computed value of r equal to 0.962 is less than the larger critical value of 0.707, it can be said that the correlation between the two variables is significant.

Moreover, the p-value is less than 0.05. This also implies that correlation is significant.

Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to claim that there is a linear correlation between the amount of Tar and Nicotine (mg).

04

Compute the percentage of variation

b.

Thepercentage of the variation in nicotine can be explained by the linear correlation between nicotine and tar is given as,

\(\begin{aligned} {r^2} &= {0.962^2}\\ &= 0.925\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the percentage of the variation in nicotine can be explained by the linear correlation between nicotine and tar is 92.5%.

05

Compute the regression equation

c.

Let x represents the amount of tar.

Let y represent the amount of nicotine.

The regression equationis given as,

\(\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\)

The mean value of xis given as,

\(\begin{aligned} \bar x &= \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{25 + 27 + 20 + .... + 24}}{8}\\ &= 22.625\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the mean value of x is 22.625.

The mean value of yis given as,

\(\begin{aligned} \bar y &= \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{y_i}} }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{1.5 + 1.7 + .... + 1.4}}{8}\\ &= 1.325\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the mean value of y is 1.325.

Thestandard deviation of xis given as,

\(\begin{aligned} {s_x} &= \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{({x_i} - \bar x)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ &= \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {25 - 22.625} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {27 - 22.625} \right)}^2} + ..... + {{\left( {24 - 22.625} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}} \\ &= 2.7222\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation of x is 2.7222.

The standard deviation of yis given as,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{s_y} &= \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{({y_i} - \bar y)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ &= \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {1.5 - 1.325} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {1.7 - 1.325} \right)}^2} + ..... + {{\left( {1.4 - 1.325} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}} \\ &= 0.2604\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation of y is 0.2604.

The slope of the regression line is given as,

\(\begin{aligned} {b_1} &= r\frac{{{s_Y}}}{{{s_X}}}\\ &= 0.962 \times \frac{{0.2604}}{{2.7222}}\\ &= 0.0920\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of the slope is 0.0920.

Theinterceptis computed as,

\(\begin{aligned} {b_0} &= \bar y - {b_1}\bar x\\ &= 1.325 - \left( {0.0920 \times 22.625} \right)\\ &= - 0.757\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of intercept is -0.757.

Substituting the above values, the regression equation is given as,

The regression equationis given as,

\(\begin{aligned} \hat y &= {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ &= - 0.757 + 0.0920x\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the regression equation is \(\hat y = - 0.757 + 0.0920x\).

06

Predict the amount of nicotine

d.

The amount of tar is 23 mg.

The predicted amount of nicotine is computed as,

\(\begin{aligned} \hat y &= - 0.757 + 0.0920x\\ &= - 0.757 + \left( {0.0920 \times 23} \right)\\ &= 1.359\\ &\approx 1.4\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the predicted amount of nicotine is 1.4 mg.

Therefore, the predicted amount of nicotine (1.4 mg) is very close to the actual amount of nicotine (1.3 mg).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13鈥28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Oscars Listed below are ages of Oscar winners matched by the years in which the awards were won (from Data Set 14 鈥淥scar Winner Age鈥 in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors? Should we expect that there would be a correlation?

Actress

28

30

29

61

32

33

45

29

62

22

44

54

Actor

43

37

38

45

50

48

60

50

39

55

44

33

In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 鈥淐ar Measurements鈥 in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi, gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi, gal).

A Honda Civic weighs 2740 lb, it has an engine displacement of 1.8 L, and its highway fuel consumption is 36 mi/gal. What is the best predicted value of the city fuel consumption? Is that predicted value likely to be a good estimate? Is that predicted value likely to be very accurate?

Exercises 13鈥28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13鈥28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the pizza costs and subway fares to find the best predicted

subway fare, given that the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00. Is the best predicted subway fare likely to be implemented?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13鈥28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Lemons and Car Crashes Listed below are annual data for various years. The data are weights (metric tons) of lemons imported from Mexico and U.S. car crash fatality rates per 100,000 population (based on data from 鈥淭he Trouble with QSAR (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace Fallacy),鈥 by Stephen Johnson, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 48, No. 1). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between weights of lemon imports from Mexico and U.S. car fatality rates? Do the results suggest that imported lemons cause car fatalities?

Lemon Imports

230

265

358

480

530

Crash Fatality Rate

15.9

15.7

15.4

15.3

14.9

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13鈥28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

CPI and the Subway Use CPI>subway data from the preceding exercise to determine whether there is a significant linear correlation between the CPI (Consumer Price Index) and the subway fare.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.