/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q2BSC Super Bowl and \({R^2}\)Let x r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Super Bowl and\({R^2}\)Let x represent years coded as 1, 2, 3, . . . for years starting in 1980, and let y represent the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl from 1980. Using the data from 1980 to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing, we obtain the following values of\({R^2}\)for the different models: linear: 0.147; quadratic: 0.255; logarithmic: 0.176; exponential: 0.175; power: 0.203. Based on these results, which model is best? Is the best model a good model? What do the results suggest about predicting the number of points scored in a future Super Bowl game?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The quadratic model is the best.

The quadratic model is not a good model.

It is not desirable to predict the number of points scored in a future Super Bowl game because the fitted model is not a good model.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The relation between y (number of points scored in each Super Bowl from 1980) and x (years starting from 1980 and coded as 1,2,3…..) is modeled by 5 different models. The \({R^2}\) value of each model is provided.

02

Comparison of \({R^2}\)

To determine which of the 5 models is the best fit for the given two variables, the model with the highest value of\({R^2}\)is considered the most appropriate.

The following are the\({R^2}\)values corresponding to the 5 models:

  • Linear:\({R^2} = 0.147\)
  • Quadratic:\({R^2} = 0.255\)
  • Logarithmic:\({R^2} = 0.176\)
  • Exponential:\({R^2} = 0.175\)
  • Power:\({R^2} = 0.203\)

The highest value of\({R^2}\)is equal to 0.255 and corresponds to the quadratic model.

Thus, it can be concluded that the quadratic model is the best.

03

Good model

For a fitted model to be good, the value of\({R^2}\)should be substantially large.

Here, the value of\({R^2}\)corresponding to the quadratic model is very low, equal to 0.255.

Thus, the fitted quadratic model is not a good model.

04

Prediction

Since the model is not a good model, the predicted values obtained from this model are not accurate.

Thus, it is not advisable to use the quadratic model to predict the number of points scored in a future Super Bowl game.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. Use the given data to find the regression equation and the best predicted value of the response variable. Be sure to follow the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493. Use a 0.05 significance level.

For 30 recent Academy Award ceremonies, ages of Best Supporting Actors (x) and ages of Best Supporting Actresses (y) are recorded. The 30 paired ages yield\(\bar x = 52.1\)years,\(\bar y = 37.3\)years, r= 0.076, P-value = 0.691, and

\(\hat y = 34.4 + 0.0547x\). Find the best predicted value of\(\hat y\)(age of Best Supporting Actress) in 1982, when the age of the Best Supporting Actor (x) was 46 years.

Scatterplots Match these values of r with the five scatterplots shown below: 0.268, 0.992, -1, 0.746, and 1.

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Old Faithful Listed below are duration times (seconds) and time intervals (min) to the next eruption for randomly selected eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser in Yellowstone National Park. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between duration times and interval after times?

Duration

242

255

227

251

262

207

140

Interval After

91

81

91

92

102

94

91

Global Warming If we find that there is a linear correlation between the concentration of carbon dioxide (\(C{O_2}\)) in our atmosphere and the global mean temperature, does that indicate that changes in (\(C{O_2}\))cause changes in the global mean temperature? Why or why not?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

If you had computed the value of the linear correlation coefficient to be 1.500, what should you conclude?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.