/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 Thunder Bolt, Inc., is a manufac... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Thunder Bolt, Inc., is a manufacturer of the very popular 636 motorcycles. The management at Thunder Bolt has recently adopted absorption costing and is debating which denominator-level concept to use. The G36 motorcycles sell for an average price of \(\$ 8,200\). Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead costs for 2012 are estimated at \(\$ 6,480,000\). Thunder Bolt, Inc., uses subassembly operators that provide component parts. The following are the denominator- level options that management has been considering: a. Theoretical capacity-based on three shifts, completion of five motorcycles per shift, and a 360 -day year \(-3 \times 5 \times 360=5,400\). b. Practical capacity- theoretical capacity adjusted for unavoidable interruptions, breakdowns, and so forth-3 \(\times 4 \times 320=3,840\). c. Normal capacity utilization- estimated at 3,240 units. d. Master-budget capacity utilization-the strengthening stock market and the growing popularity of motorcycles have prompted the marketing department to issue an estimate for 2012 of 3,600 units. 1\. Calculate the budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead cost rates under the four denominator-level concepts 2\. What are the benefits to Thunder Bolt, Inc., of using either theoretical capacity or practical capacity? 3\. Under a cost-based pricing system, what are the negative aspects of a master-budget denominator level? What are the positive aspects?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The overhead rates are $1200, $1687.50, $2000, and $1800 respectively. Using theoretical or practical capacity leads to lower costs per unit. Master-budget level reflects budget estimations but may result in higher unit costs.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Theoretical Capacity Overhead Rate

The budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead cost for the year is \\(6,480,000. The theoretical capacity is 5,400 motorcycles. To find the overhead rate per motorcycle, we divide the total overhead by the theoretical capacity.\[\text{Theoretical Capacity Overhead Rate} = \frac{6,480,000}{5,400} = \\)1,200\]
02

Calculate Practical Capacity Overhead Rate

Practical capacity adjusts the theoretical capacity for unavoidable interruptions. The practical capacity is 3,840 motorcycles. Find the overhead rate by dividing the overhead cost by the practical capacity.\[\text{Practical Capacity Overhead Rate} = \frac{6,480,000}{3,840} = \$1,687.50\]
03

Calculate Normal Capacity Utilization Overhead Rate

The normal capacity utilization is 3,240 motorcycles. Calculate the overhead rate by dividing the overhead cost by the normal capacity utilization.\[\text{Normal Capacity Utilization Overhead Rate} = \frac{6,480,000}{3,240} = \$2,000\]
04

Calculate Master-Budget Capacity Utilization Overhead Rate

The master-budget capacity utilization estimates production at 3,600 motorcycles. Find the overhead rate by dividing the overhead cost by the master-budget capacity utilization.\[\text{Master-Budget Capacity Utilization Overhead Rate} = \frac{6,480,000}{3,600} = \$1,800\]
05

Analyze Benefits of Theoretical and Practical Capacity

Using theoretical or practical capacity spreads the fixed overhead over more units, resulting in a lower cost per unit, thus potentially offering higher profit margins. Also, it accounts for real production capabilities or limitations, and it helps management review operating efficiency.
06

Discuss Cost-Based Pricing Using Master-Budget Denominator Level

The negative aspect is that a lower denominator results in a higher cost per unit, potentially making pricing less competitive. However, it reflects actual anticipated production and sales levels, which can make economic planning and forecasting more accurate. It aligns with budgeted revenues and anticipated sales.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Denominator-Level Capacity Concepts
Understanding denominator-level capacity concepts is essential when adopting absorption costing. These concepts determine the level of production used to allocate fixed manufacturing overhead costs. Choosing a suitable denominator-level directly affects product costing and pricing strategies. Here are the common denominator levels considered by Thunder Bolt, Inc.:
  • Theoretical Capacity: Assumes the maximum output with no disruptions, typically calculated over a full operational year with multiple shifts.
  • Practical Capacity: Adjusts the theoretical level for inevitable downtime like maintenance and breaks, providing a more realistic production level.
  • Normal Capacity Utilization: Reflects the expected average production based on historical data and trends.
  • Master-Budget Capacity Utilization: Aligns with the budgeted production levels for the period, often considering market conditions.
Choosing the right denominator level is crucial as it influences the overhead cost rate per unit, affecting both pricing and profitability.
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead Cost Rates
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost rates represent how fixed costs are spread over each unit produced. These rates vary significantly based on the denominator-level capacity chosen. To compute the overhead cost rate, divide the total fixed overhead by the chosen denominator level, which is the anticipated production quantity. For example, if Thunder Bolt uses practical capacity, fixed costs are spread over fewer units than theoretical capacity, resulting in a higher overhead cost rate per motorcycle. Conversely, utilizing theoretical capacity results in the lowest overhead cost per unit, as it's distributed over more units. These rates impact pricing, as they determine part of the cost structure of each unit manufactured, directly affecting profitability.
Cost-Based Pricing Implications
Cost-based pricing closely ties the selling price of a product to its production cost. The choice of denominator-level capacity can significantly affect this pricing model. Master-budget capacity utilization results in a higher cost per unit due to fewer units over which fixed costs are spread. While this might increase product prices, reflecting closer to actual sales and production levels, it might also make products less competitive in the market. While higher rates under master-budget capacity might make planning and forecasting more aligned with expected sales, they squeeze profit margins unless prices are raised. Cost-based pricing relies on balancing these factors to set competitive yet profitable prices.
Theoretical vs Practical Capacity
When choosing between theoretical and practical capacity, both have unique advantages worth considering:
  • Theoretical Capacity: Provides a baseline for the maximum possible production. It's ideal for high-level efficiency assessments and long-term strategic planning. However, its practicality is limited as it assumes no production downtime.
  • Practical Capacity: Offers a more realistic view by accounting for production hiccups. It provides a clearer insight into the true operating capacity.
Using practical capacity for planning means embracing a more achievable production vision, aligning closely with realistic operations. This makes it especially useful for adjusting operational targets and evaluating efficiency without over-optimistic assumptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Match each of the following items with one or more of the denominator-level capacity concepts by putting the appropriate letter(s) by each item: a. Theoretical capacity b. Practical capacity c. Normal capacity utilization d. Master-budget capacity utilization 1\. Measures the denominator level in terms of what a plant can supply 2\. Is based on producing at full efficiency all the time 3\. Represents the expected level of capacity utilization for the next budget period 4\. Measures the denominator level in terms of demand for the output of the plant 5\. Takes into account seasonal, cyclical, and trend factors 6\. Should be used for performance evaluation in the current year 7\. Represents an ideal benchmark 8\. Highlights the cost of capacity acquired but not used 9\. Should be used for long-term pricing purposes 10\. Hides the cost of capacity acquired but not used 11\. If used as the denominator-level concept, would avoid the restatement of unit costs when expected demand levels change

Do companies in either the service sector or the merchandising sector make choices about absorption costing versus variable costing?

The Mavis Company uses an absorption-costing system based on standard costs. Total variable manufacturing cost, including direct material cost, is \(\$ 3\) per unit; the standard production rate is 10 units per machine-hour. Total budgeted and actual fixed manufacturing overhead costs are \(\$ 420,000\). Fixed manufacturing overhead is allocated at \(\$ 7\) per machine-hour \((\$ 420,000 \div\) 60,000 machine-hours of denominator level). Selling price is \(\$ 5\) per unit. Variable operating (nonmanufacturing) cost, which is driven by units sold, is \(\$ 1\) per unit. Fixed operating (nonmanufacturing) costs are \(\$ 120,000\). Beginning inventory in 2012 is 30,000 units; ending inventory is 40,000 units. Sales in 2012 are 540,000 units. The same standard unit costs persisted throughout 2011 and 2012 . For simplicity, assume that there are no price, spending, or efficiency variances. 1\. Prepare an income statement for 2012 assuming that the production-volume variance is written off at year-end as an adjustment to cost of goods sold. 2\. The president has heard about variable costing. She asks you to recast the 2012 statement as it would appear under variable costing. 3\. Explain the difference in operating income as calculated in requirements 1 and 2. 4\. Graph how fixed manufacturing overhead is accounted for under absorption costing. That is, there will be two lines: one for the budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead (which is equal to the actual fixed manufacturing overhead in this case) and one for the fixed manufacturing overhead allocated. Show how the production-volume variance might be indicated in the graph. 5\. Critics have claimed that a widely used accounting system has led to undesirable buildups of inventory levels. (a) Is variable costing or absorption costing more likely to lead to such buildups? Why? (b) What can be done to counteract undesirable inventory buildups?

The main trouble with variable costing is that it ignores the increasing importance of fixed costs in manufacturing companies. Do you agree? Why?

Mega-Air, Inc., manufactures a specialized snowboard made for the advanced snowboarder. Mega-Air began 2011 with an inventory of 240 snowboards. During the year, it produced 900 boards and sold 995 for \(\$ 750\) each. Fixed production costs were \(\$ 280,000\) and variable production costs were \(\$ 335\) per unit. Fixed advertising, marketing, and other general and administrative expenses were \(\$ 112,000\) and variable shipping costs were \(\$ 15\) per board. Assume that the cost of each unit in beginning inventory is equal to 2011 inventory cost. 1\. Prepare an income statement assuming Mega-Air uses variable costing 2\. Prepare an income statement assuming Mega-Air uses absorption costing. Mega-Air uses a denominator level of 1,000 units. Production-volume variances are written off to cost of goods sold. 3\. Compute the breakeven point in units sold assuming Mega-Air uses the following: a. Variable costing b. Absorption costing (Production = 900 boards) 4\. Provide proof of your preceding breakeven calculations. 5\. Assume that \(\$ 20,000\) of fixed administrative costs were reclassified as fixed production costs. Would this change affect breakeven point using variable costing? What if absorption costing were used? Explain. 6\. The company that supplies Mega-Air with its specialized impact-resistant material has announced a price increase of \(\$ 25\) for each board. What effect would this have on the breakeven points previously calculated?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.