/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 Refer to Exercise \(5 .\) The re... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to Exercise \(5 .\) The regression equation is \(\hat{y}=29.29-0.96 x,\) the sample size is \(8,\) and the standard error of the slope is \(0.22 .\) Use the .05 significance level. Can we conclude that the slope of the regression line is less than zero?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the slope is significantly less than zero at the 0.05 level.

Step by step solution

01

Setting up the Hypotheses

We begin by defining the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the slope \(\beta_1 = 0\), meaning there is no relationship. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) suggests that the slope \(\beta_1 < 0\), indicating a negative relationship.
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

Next, we calculate the test statistic using the formula for the t-statistic: \( t = \frac{b_1 - \beta_1}{SE(b_1)} \). Here, \(b_1 = -0.96\) is our estimated slope, \(\beta_1 = 0\), and the standard error \(SE(b_1) = 0.22\). Thus, the calculation is: \[ t = \frac{-0.96 - 0}{0.22} = -4.36 \].
03

Determine the Critical Value

Using the t-distribution table, determine the critical value for a one-tailed test with \(n - 2 = 6\) degrees of freedom at the 0.05 significance level. The critical value for \(t\) is approximately -1.943.
04

Compare Test Statistic and Critical Value

We compare the test statistic \(t = -4.36\) with the critical value of \(-1.943\). Since \(-4.36 < -1.943\), we reject the null hypothesis.
05

Conclusion

Given the test statistic is in the critical region, we have sufficient evidence at the 0.05 significance level to conclude that the slope of the regression line is less than zero, indicating a significant negative relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Regression Analysis
Regression Analysis is a statistical tool used to identify relationships between variables. It helps in predicting the value of a dependent variable based on the value of at least one independent variable. In the context of the exercise, the regression equation \( \hat{y}=29.29-0.96x \) indicates that there is a potential linear relationship between \(x\) and the predicted variable \(\hat{y}\). This equation tells us that for every unit increase in \(x\), \(\hat{y}\) decreases by 0.96 units. This change in \(\hat{y}\) is the slope of the regression line.
To ensure the reliability of this analysis, the estimation of the slope, represented by \(b_1\), is tested statistically. If \(b_1\) significantly differs from zero, it supports the idea that a true relationship between \(x\) and \(\hat{y}\) exists. Regression analysis is foundational for understanding how changes in independent variables affect the dependent variable, and drawing insights by examining the slope provides a deeper understanding of the data.
T-Statistic
The T-Statistic is a crucial element in hypothesis testing, particularly in regression analysis. It helps us determine how far the estimated slope is from the hypothesized slope. In this exercise, the t-statistic was calculated to test whether the slope of the regression line is different from zero.
Using the formula \( t = \frac{b_1 - \beta_1}{SE(b_1)} \), where \(b_1\) is the estimated slope, \(\beta_1\) is the hypothesized slope (usually zero), and \(SE(b_1)\) is the standard error of the slope, the t-statistic tells us how many standard errors the estimated slope is from zero. In this case, the t-statistic is -4.36, indicating that the slope is 4.36 standard errors below zero.
This value, which is notably large (in absolute terms), suggests that the estimated slope is far from zero, providing significant evidence against the null hypothesis. The t-statistic is a key metric because it translates the estimated parameter into a standardized form that is easy to compare with a critical value obtained from the t-distribution.
Significance Level
The Significance Level is a threshold used in hypothesis testing to determine when to reject the null hypothesis. It is denoted by \(\alpha\) and often set at 0.05, implying a 5% risk of concluding that a relationship exists when in fact, it does not. In simpler terms, it represents the probability of making a Type I error, which occurs when a true null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected.
In the given problem, the significance level is set at 0.05. This means that if our test results show a probability of occurrence less than 5%, we have strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
The critical value, which is the boundary between the acceptance region and the rejection region for the null hypothesis, is compared against the calculated test statistic. If the test statistic is more extreme than the critical value (as it is in this exercise with \(-4.36\) compared to \(-1.943\)), it indicates that the observed result is unlikely to occur by random chance, supporting the conclusion to reject the null hypothesis.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Null and Alternative Hypotheses are foundational concepts in hypothesis testing. They are opposing statements used to determine the validity of an observed effect.
The Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)) usually proposes that there is no effect or no relationship between variables. In regression analysis, \(H_0\) often states that the slope of the line is equal to zero \((\beta_1 = 0)\), indicating no relationship.
The Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is what we want to prove. It suggests that there is a relationship, or an effect does exist. In the context of this exercise, \(H_a\) posits that the slope is less than zero \((\beta_1 < 0)\), indicating a negative relationship.
When testing hypotheses, we determine whether the test statistic falls within a critical region. If it does, we reject \(H_0\) in favor of \(H_a\). In our exercise, because \(t = -4.36\) falls within the rejection region, we are led to reject the null hypothesis, concluding there is sufficient evidence for a negative relationship between \(x\) and \(\hat{y}\).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A regional commuter airline selected a random sample of 25 flights and found that the correlation between the number of passengers and the total weight, in pounds, of luggage stored in the luggage compartment is \(0.94 .\) Using the .05 significance level, can we conclude that there is a positive association between the two variables?

Pennsylvania Refining Company is studying the relationship between the pump price of gasoline and the number of gallons sold. For a sample of 20 stations last Tuesday, the correlation was .78. At the . 01 significance level, is the correlation in the population greater than zero?

A dog trainer is exploring the relationship between the size of the dog (weight in pounds) and its daily food consumption (measured in standard cups). Below is the result of a sample of 18 observations. $$ \begin{array}{|ccc|ccc|} \hline \text { Dog } & \text { Weight } & \text { Consumption } & \text { Dog } & \text { Weight } & \text { Consumption } \\ \hline 1 & 41 & 3 & 10 & 91 & 5 \\ 2 & 148 & 8 & 11 & 109 & 6 \\ 3 & 79 & 5 & 12 & 207 & 10 \\ 4 & 41 & 4 & 13 & 49 & 3 \\ 5 & 85 & 5 & 14 & 113 & 6 \\ 6 & 111 & 6 & 15 & 84 & 5 \\ 7 & 37 & 3 & 16 & 95 & 5 \\ 8 & 111 & 6 & 17 & 57 & 4 \\ 9 & 41 & 3 & 18 & 168 & 9 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Compute the correlation coefficient. Is it reasonable to conclude that the correlation in the population is greater than zero? Use the .05 significance level. b. Develop the regression equation for cups based on the dog's weight. How much does each additional cup change the estimated weight of the dog? c. Is one of the dogs a big undereater or overeater?

Refer to Exercise \(18 .\) The regression equation is \(\hat{y}=9.9198-0.00039 x,\) the sample size is \(9,\) and the standard error of the slope is \(0.0032 .\) Use the .05 significance level. Can we conclude that the slope of the regression line is less than zero?

A consumer buying cooperative tested the effective heating area of 20 different electric space heaters with different wattages. Here are the results. $$ \begin{array}{|crr|rrr|} \hline \text { Heater } & \text { Wattage } & \text { Area } & \text { Heater } & \text { Wattage } & \text { Area } \\ \hline 1 & 1,500 & 205 & 11 & 1,250 & 116 \\ 2 & 750 & 70 & 12 & 500 & 72 \\ 3 & 1,500 & 199 & 13 & 500 & 82 \\ 4 & 1,250 & 151 & 14 & 1,500 & 206 \\ 5 & 1,250 & 181 & 15 & 2,000 & 245 \\ 6 & 1,250 & 217 & 16 & 1,500 & 219 \\ 7 & 1,000 & 94 & 17 & 750 & 63 \\ 8 & 2,000 & 298 & 18 & 1,500 & 200 \\ 9 & 1,000 & 135 & 19 & 1,250 & 151 \\ 10 & 1,500 & 211 & 20 & 500 & 44 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Compute the correlation between the wattage and heating area. Is there a direct or an indirect relationship? b. Conduct a test of hypothesis to determine if it is reasonable that the coefficient is greater than zero. Use the .05 significance level. c. Develop the regression equation for effective heating based on wattage. d. Which heater looks like the "best buy" based on the size of the residual?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.