91Ó°ÊÓ

The sample proportion gives us an estimate of what fraction of a population is expected to show a particular characteristic, based on a random sample. In our example, we are interested in knowing the proportion of defective circuits in a lot of integrated circuits.
To calculate the sample proportion:

• Count the number of targets showing the characteristic of interest (defective circuits).
• Divide that number by the total number of samples tested.

For instance, in a test of 300 circuits where 13 are found to be defective, the sample proportion, denoted as \( \hat{p}, \)is:\[ \hat{p} = \frac{13}{300} = 0.0433. \]This means about 4.33% of the circuits in this sample are defective.
The sample proportion is crucial in inferential statistics as it helps in estimating the proportion for the whole population with a certain level of confidence.

The standard error (SE) of a sample proportion provides a measure of how much variability there is around that proportion. It helps us understand how accurately our sample proportion can estimate the true population proportion. The lower the standard error, the more precise our estimate. To calculate the standard error of a sample proportion, use the formula:
\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}}. \]Here, \( \hat{p} \)is the sample proportion, and \( n \)is the sample size.
In our case, substituting the sample proportion and sample size,\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.0433(1-0.0433)}{300}} \approx 0.0119. \]This value informs us about how much deviation we might expect from the true proportion if we were to take multiple samples of the same size.

A Z-value is a measure used in statistics that relates to the standard normal distribution curve. It indicates how many standard deviations a point is from the mean of the distribution. In confidence intervals, it helps us define the coverage probability. For a given confidence level, like 95%, the corresponding Z-value tells us the range within which the true parameter lies with that confidence.
In our example, we first need a Z-value for a 95% two-sided confidence interval where it is roughly 1.96. This means there's a 95% chance the true proportion is within 1.96 standard errors on either side of the estimated proportion. For a one-sided confidence bound (just the upper limit, in this case), the Z-value is slightly lower, about 1.645.
These Z-values are critical in calculating how confident we are in our statistical estimations and predictions.

The upper confidence bound provides an assurance that the true proportion of a population characteristic is less than a specified value with a set level of confidence. Here, the upper bound is specifically about the potential maximum proportion of defectives in the circuits beyond the sample mean.
To compute this bound, we use the sample proportion, the standard error, and a one-tailed Z-value. For a 95% upper bound, the Z-value, as mentioned, is about 1.645.
The formula is:\[ \hat{p} + Z \cdot SE, \]where substituting values, we get:\[ 0.0433 + 1.645 \times 0.0119 = 0.0629. \]This suggests that, with 95% confidence, the true proportion of defective circuits doesn't exceed 6.29%.
This method is useful in quality control and assurance, especially when it is more critical to assess the maximum possible defect rate rather than the full range.