/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 91 The maker of a shampoo knows tha... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The maker of a shampoo knows that customers like this product to have a lot of foam. Ten sample bottles of the product are selected at random and the foam heights observed are as follows (in millimeters): 210,215,194,195,211,201 \(198,204,208,\) and \(196 .\) (a) Is there evidence to support the assumption that foam height is normally distributed? (b) Find a \(95 \% \mathrm{Cl}\) on the mean foam height. (c) Find a \(95 \%\) prediction interval on the next bottle of shampoo that will be tested. (d) Find an interval that contains \(95 \%\) of the shampoo foam heights with \(99 \%\) confidence. (e) Explain the difference in the intervals computed in parts (b), (c), and (d).

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Check normality using Q-Q plot and Shapiro-Wilk test. (b) 95% CI is 197.87 to 208.53 mm. (c) Prediction interval is 185.38 to 221.02 mm. (d) Tolerance interval is 181.28 to 225.12 mm. (e) CI estimates mean, PI predicts a single value, TI covers most population with high confidence.

Step by step solution

01

Assess Normality of Distribution (Part a)

First, we need to calculate the mean and standard deviation of the given sample data to determine if the foam heights are normally distributed. The sample data is: \(210,215,194,195,211,201,198,204,208,196\). Calculate the mean: \[ \bar{x} = \frac{210+215+194+195+211+201+198+204+208+196}{10} = 203.2 \]Calculate the standard deviation: \[ s = \sqrt{\frac{(210-203.2)^2 + (215-203.2)^2 + \ldots + (196-203.2)^2}{9}} \approx 7.45 \]Then, create a Q-Q plot to visually assess if the sample data follows a normal distribution. The data points should fall approximately along the line if the data is normal. Run normality tests like the Shapiro-Wilk test for further validation.
02

Confidence Interval for Mean Foam Height (Part b)

To calculate the 95% confidence interval for the mean foam height, use the sample mean \(\bar{x}\) and standard deviation \(s\).The formula for the confidence interval is:\[ \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \cdot \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \]where \(\alpha=0.05\), \(n=10\), and \(t_{\alpha/2, 9}\) is the t-value from the t-distribution table with 9 degrees of freedom, which is approximately 2.262 for a 95% CI.Calculate:\[ 203.2 \pm 2.262 \cdot \frac{7.45}{\sqrt{10}} = 203.2 \pm 5.33 \]The 95% CI is approximately 197.87 to 208.53 mm.
03

Prediction Interval for Next Bottle (Part c)

A prediction interval estimates the range where a single future observation will fall. The formula is:\[ \bar{x} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-1} \cdot s \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{n}} \]Using the same \(t_{\alpha/2, 9} = 2.262\):\[ 203.2 \pm 2.262 \cdot 7.45 \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{10}} = 203.2 \pm 2.262 \cdot 7.85 \]This results in a prediction interval of approximately 185.38 to 221.02 mm.
04

Confidence Interval on Range for 95% of Foam Heights (Part d)

To find an interval that contains 95% of the foam heights with 99% confidence, use the formula for tolerance intervals:\[ \bar{x} \pm k \cdot s \]where \(k\) depends on sample size and confidence level and is typically found using statistical software. For a 95% range with 99% confidence, \(k \approx 2.938\).Calculation:\[ 203.2 \pm 2.938 \cdot 7.45 \]This results in a tolerance interval of approximately 181.28 to 225.12 mm.
05

Explaining Differences in Intervals (Part e)

- The confidence interval (part b) estimates the range of the mean of the population and implies where the true population mean falls with 95% certainty. - The prediction interval (part c) estimates where an individual future observation might fall, resulting in a wider interval. - The tolerance interval (part d) provides a range which is expected to contain 95% of the population with a higher confidence level of 99%, hence it is also wider than the confidence interval for the mean.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Normal Distribution
The normal distribution is a core concept in statistics, often represented as the symmetrical bell-shaped curve. It depicts how values are distributed around a mean or average in a dataset. In this distribution:
  • The mean, median, and mode are all equal.
  • It is symmetric around the mean.
  • The spread is determined by standard deviation.
When checking if a dataset, such as the shampoo foam heights, follows a normal distribution, statisticians often rely on visual tools and statistical tests. One common tool is the Q-Q plot, which plots observed data versus expected normal values. If the data aligns along the reference line, it suggests a normal distribution. Additionally, tests like the Shapiro-Wilk test can mathematically verify normality. Understanding whether data is normal is crucial for choosing the correct statistical methods to apply thereafter.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values that estimate the true population mean. This estimation is expressed with a certain level of confidence, typically 95%. That means if we were to take 100 different samples and compute a confidence interval for each, about 95 of those intervals would contain the true population mean. The calculation of a confidence interval relies on the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and the number of observations. Specifically, the formula used incorporates the t-distribution to account for smaller sample sizes. For example, in our case of foam heights, the 95% confidence interval was approximately 197.87 to 208.53 mm, meaning there's a 95% chance this range contains the actual mean foam height. This tool is invaluable in statistics as it provides a way to express the uncertainty inherent in sample-based estimates of population parameters.
Prediction Interval
The prediction interval estimates the range within which a single future observation will fall, given what we know about the data's current distribution. It is often wider than a confidence interval because it accounts for both the variability in the sample mean and the variability in individual observations. The formula for a prediction interval is similar to that of a confidence interval but includes an additional term to accommodate this increased uncertainty. For the shampoo example, the 95% prediction interval was calculated to be approximately 185.38 to 221.02 mm. This indicates that we can be 95% confident that the next foam height tested will fall within this range. This interval is pragmatic in quality control and future planning, as it helps to predict outcomes beyond just the mean.
Tolerance Interval
A tolerance interval differs from confidence and prediction intervals. It provides a range within which a certain percentage of the population data will fall, with a specified level of confidence. For instance, a 95% tolerance interval with 99% confidence means that we expect 95% of the population to fall within the calculated interval, 99% of the time. This type of interval is calculated using the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and a constant ( k ), which is determined from statistical tables or software for the desired coverage and confidence level. In our exercise with shampoo heights, the tolerance interval was roughly 181.28 to 225.12 mm. This capability is highly valuable, especially in manufacturing and quality assurance, where understanding the spread of a characteristic within a population helps meet specifications and standards.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in the Journal of Agricultural Science [ "The Use of Residual Maximum Likelihood to Model Grain Quality Characteristics of Wheat with Variety, Climatic and Nitrogen Fertilizer Effects" (1997, Vol. 128, pp. \(135-142\) ) ] investigated means of wheat grain crude protein content (CP) and Hagberg falling number (HFN) surveyed in the UK. The analysis used a variety of nitrogen fertilizer applications (kg N/ha), temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right),\) and total monthly rainfall \((\mathrm{mm})\). The data shown below describe temperatures for wheat grown at Harper Adams Agricultural College between 1982 and \(1993 .\) The temperatures measured in June were obtained as follows: $$ \begin{array}{llllll} 15.2 & 14.2 & 14.0 & 12.2 & 14.4 & 12.5 \\ 14.3 & 14.2 & 13.5 & 11.8 & 15.2 & \end{array} $$ Assume that the standard deviation is known to be \(\sigma=0.5\). (a) Construct a \(99 \%\) two-sided confidence interval on the mean temperature. (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) lower-confidence bound on the mean temperature. (c) Suppose that we wanted to be \(95 \%\) confident that the error in estimating the mean temperature is less than 2 degrees Celsius. What sample size should be used? (d) Suppose that we wanted the total width of the two-sided confidence interval on mean temperature to be 1.5 degrees Celsius at \(95 \%\) confidence. What sample size should be used?

Of 1000 randomly selected cases of lung cancer, 823 resulted in death within 10 years. (a) Calculate a \(95 \%\) two-sided confidence interval on the death rate from lung cancer. (b) Using the point estimate of \(p\) obtained from the preliminary sample, what sample size is needed to be \(95 \%\) confident that the error in estimating the true value of \(p\) is less than \(0.03 ?\) (c) How large must the sample be if we wish to be at least \(95 \%\) confident that the error in estimating \(p\) is less than \(0.03,\) regardless of the true value of \(p ?\)

An article in Cancer Research ["Analyses of LitterMatched Time-to-Response Data, with Modifications for Recovery of Interlitter Information" (1977, Vol. 37, pp. \(3863-3868\) ) ] tested the tumorigenesis of a drug. Rats were randomly selected from litters and given the drug. The times of tumor appearance were recorded as follows: \(101,104,104,77,89,88,104,96,82,70,89,91,39,103,93,\) \(85,104,104,81,67,104,104,104,87,104,89,78,104,86,\) \(76,103,102,80,45,94,104,104,76,80,72,73,\) Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the standard deviation of time until a tumor appearance. Check the assumption of normality of the population and comment on the assumptions for the confidence interval.

An article in the Journal of the American Statistical Association (1990, Vol. 85, pp. 972-985) measured the weight of 30 rats under experiment controls. Suppose that there are 12 underweight rats. (a) Calculate a \(95 \%\) two-sided confidence interval on the true proportion of rats that would show underweight from the experiment. (b) Using the point estimate of \(p\) obtained from the preliminary sample, what sample size is needed to be \(95 \%\) confident that the error in estimating the true value of \(p\) is less than \(0.02 ?\) (c) How large must the sample be if we wish to be at least \(95 \%\) confident that the error in estimating \(p\) is less than 0.02, regardless of the true value of \(p ?\)

Consider the one-sided confidence interval expressions for a mean of a normal population. (a) What value of \(z_{\alpha}\) would result in a \(90 \%\) CI? (b) What value of \(z_{\alpha}\) would result in a \(95 \%\) CI? (c) What value of \(z_{\alpha}\) would result in a \(99 \% \mathrm{CI} ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.