/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q14E You are given an array of  n e... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

You are given an array of nelements, and you notice that some of the elements are duplicates; that is, they appear more than once in the array. Show how to remove all duplicates from the array in time O(nlogn) .

Short Answer

Expert verified

All duplicates are removed from the array in time: O(nlogn)

Step by step solution

01

Method-I

We may use pre-processing to eliminate duplicates by sorting the array. Its arrays sort consumes Onlogn time, and then we can verify if the last value is like the present value inside one pass; if it is, we don't display that number; otherwise, we do. We'll be able to get rid of the duplicates this way.

So the total amount of time is nLogn+1=OnLogn

02

Method-II

We need to perform nested loops if we haven't done the pre-processing yet. We execute one loop over the whole array (assuming index i and for each index i we check to see if the identical element is in the remaining set; if so, we do not print the element; otherwise, we do. Without pre-processing, the complexity will be ON2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In this problem we will develop a divide-and-conquer algorithm for the following geometric task.

CLOSEST PAIRInput: A set of points in the plane, {p1=(x1;y1),p2=(x2,y2),...,pn=(xn,yn)}

Output: The closest pair of points: that is, the pair Pi≠Pjfor which the distance between piand pj, that is,

(xi-xi)2+z(yi-yi)2,

is minimized.

For simplicity, assume that n is a power of two, and that all the x-coordinates role="math" localid="1659237354869" xi are distinct, as are the y-coordinates.

Here’s a high-level overview of the algorithm:

.Find a value for which exactly half the points have xi<x, and half have xi>x. On this basis, split the points into two groups, L and R.

• Recursively find the closest pair in L and in R. Say these pairs are pL·qL∈Land pR·qR∈Rwith distances dLand dR respectively. Let d be the smaller of these two distances.

• It remains to be seen whether there is a point in Land a point in R that are less than distance dapart from each other. To this end, discard all points with xi<x-dor xi>x+d and sort the remaining points by y-coordinate.

• Now, go through this sorted list, and for each point, compute its distance to the seven subsequent points in the list. Let pM·qMbe the closest pair found in this way.

• The answer is one of the three pairs role="math" localid="1659237951608" {pL,qL},{pR,qR}{pM,qM}, whichever is closest.

(a) In order to prove the correctness of this algorithm, start by showing the following property: any square of size d×d in the plane contains at most four points of L.

(b) Now show that the algorithm is correct. The only case which needs careful consideration is when the closest pair is split between L and R.

(c) Write down the pseudocode for the algorithm, and show that its running time is given by the recurrence:

T(n)=2T(nl2)+0(nlogn)

Show that the solution to this recurrence is o(nlogzn).

(d) Can you bring the running time down to O(nlogn)?

Question: You are given an infinite array A[·]in which the first n cells contain integers in sorted order and the rest of the cells are filled with ∞. You are not given the value of n. Describe an algorithm that takes an integer x as input and finds a position in the array containing x, if such a position exists, in O(log n) time. (If you are disturbed by the fact that the array A has infinite length, assume instead that it is of length n, but that you don’t know this length, and that the implementation of the array data type in your programming language returns the error message ∞whenever elements A[i]withi>n are accessed.)

In justifying our matrix multiplication algorithm (Section 2.5), we claimed the following block wise property: if X and Y are n×nn matrices, and

X=[ABCD],Y=[EFGH],

where A,B,C,D,E,F,G, and H are n/2×n/2 sub-matrices, then the product XY can be expressed in terms of these blocks:

XY=[ABCD][EFGH]=[AE+BGAF+BHCE+DGCF+DH]

Prove this property.

Suppose we want to evaluate the polynomial P(x) = a0 + a1x + a2x2 + ... + anxn at point x.

  1. Show that the following simple routine, known as Horner’s rule, does the job and leaves the answer in z.
    z = an
    for I = n-1 down to 0 :
    z = zx + ai
  2. How many additions and multiplications does this routine use, as a function of n ? Can you find a polynomial for which an alternative method is substantially better?

A k−way merge operation. Suppose you have ksorted arrays, each with nelements, and you want to combine them into a single sorted array ofkn elements.

(a)Here’s one strategy: Using the merge procedure from Section 2.3, merge the first two arrays, then merge in the third, then merge in the fourth, and so on. What is the time complexity of this algorithm, in terms of kand n?

(b) Give a more efficient solution to this problem, using divide-and-conquer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.