/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q54CE Consider a particle of mass m in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Consider a particle of mass m inside the well as shown in the figure. If bound, its lowest energy state would of course be the ground state, but would it be bound? Assume that for a while, it at least occupies the ground state, which is much lower thanU0, and the barriers qualify as wide. Show that a rough average time it would remain bound is given by:=mW42000hL22e where=L8mU0h.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Proved

Step by step solution

01

Concepts involved

Potential well is a region surrounding a local minimum of potential energy. The energy inside that region is trapped that鈥檚 why it is unable to convert to another form of energy.

The quantum particle trapped has finite quantized energy levels and hence it is capable oftunnelingthrough the energy barrier.

Tunneling Probability is the ratio of squared amplitudes of the waves after crossing the barrier to the incident waves.

02

Calculating time required to go from one end of well to another

You know that,

v=p/m=魔办/m

Where, v= velocity of the particle,

p= momentum of the particle

m = mass of the particle

= modified Plank鈥檚 constant

k= wave number

If you put value of kin the above obtained expression, it will be

v=mW(=2W)t=mW2

If time,t=distance/speed

03

Calculating time which it will remain bound

The time it would last would be the time obtained in the previous step divided by the tunneling probability.

You know that, Total energy, E=12222mW2(1)

IfE<<U0,Transmittance, T16EU0e2L2mU0(2)

Now, if you use equation (1) in equation (2), you get,

E=222mW2T=822mW2U0e2L2mU0

Therefore, lifetime is:mW2mW2U0822e2L2mU0=mW4U0642L2e

Hence, We can also rewrite the above equation after simplifying it as,

=mW42000hL22e

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fusion in the Sun: Without tunnelling. our Sun would fail us. The source of its energy is nuclear fusion. and a crucial step is the fusion of a light-hydrogen nucleus, which is just a proton, and a heavy-hydrogen nucleus. which is of the same charge but twice the mass. When these nuclei get close enough. their short-range attraction via the strong force overcomes their Coulomb repulsion. This allows them to stick together, resulting in a reduced total mass/internal energy and a consequent release of kinetic energy. However, the Sun's temperature is simply too low to ensure that nuclei move fast enough to overcome their repulsion.

a) By equating the average thermal kinetic energy that the nuclei would have when distant,32KBT. and the Coulomb potential energy they would have when 2fm apart, roughly the separation at which they stick, show that a temperature of about 1019K would be needed.

b) The Sun's core is only about 10k. If nuclei can鈥檛 make it "over the top." they must tunnel. Consider the following model, illustrated in the figure: One nucleus is fixed at the origin, while the other approaches from far away with energyE. As rdecreases, the Coulomb potential energy increases, until the separation ris roughly the nuclear radius rnuc. Whereupon the potential energy is Umaxand then quickly drops down into a very deep "hole" as the strong-force attraction takes over. Given then EUmax, the point b, where tunnelling must begin. will be very large compared with rnuc, so we approximate the barrier's width Las simply b. Its height, U0, we approximate by the Coulomb potential evaluated at b2. Finally. for the energy Ewhich fixes b, let us use 432KBT. which is a reasonable limit, given the natural range of speeds in a thermodynamic system.Combining these approximations, show that the exponential factor in the wide-barrier tunnelling probability is

exp[-e24蟺蔚0h4m3kBT]

c)Using the proton mass for , evaluate this factor for a temperature of107K. Then evaluate it at3000K. about that of an incandescent filament or hot flame. and rather high by Earth standards. Discuss the consequences.

What fraction of a beam of 50eVelectrons would get through a 200V1nm wide electrostatic barrier?

Solving the potential barrier smoothness conditions for relationships among the coefficients A,B鈥塧苍诲鈥Fgiving the reflection and transmission probabilities, usually involves rather messy algebra. However, there is a special case than can be done fairly easily, through requiring a slight departure from the standard solutions used in the chapter. Suppose the incident particles鈥 energyEis preciselyU0.

(a) Write down solutions to the Schrodinger Equation in the three regions. Be especially carefull in the region0<x<L. It should have two arbitrary constants and it isn鈥檛 difficult 鈥 just different.

(b) Obtain the smoothness conditions, and from these findR鈥塧苍诲鈥T.

(c) Do the results make sense in the limitL?

Question: An electron bound in an atom can be modeled as residing in a finite well. Despite the walls. When many regularly spaced atoms are relatively close together as they are in a solid-all electrons occupy alltheatoms. Make a sketch of a plausible multi-atom potential energy and electron wave function.

The potential energy barrier in field emission is not rectangular, but resembles a ramp, as shown in Figure 6.16. Here we compare tunnelling probability calculated by the crudest approximation to that calculated by a better one. In method 1, calculate T by treating the barrier as an actual ramp in which U - E is initially, but falls off with a slop of M. Use the formula given in Exercise 37. In method 2, the cruder one, assume a barrier whose height exceeds E by a constant /2(the same as the average excess for the ramp) and whose width is the same as the distance the particle tunnels through the ramp. (a) Show that the ratio T1/T2 is e8m33hM . (b) Do the methods differ more when tunnelling probability is relatively high or relatively low?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.