/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q38E The potential energy barrier in ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The potential energy barrier in field emission is not rectangular, but resembles a ramp, as shown in Figure 6.16. Here we compare tunnelling probability calculated by the crudest approximation to that calculated by a better one. In method 1, calculate T by treating the barrier as an actual ramp in which U - E is initiallyϕ, but falls off with a slop of M. Use the formula given in Exercise 37. In method 2, the cruder one, assume a barrier whose height exceeds E by a constant ϕ/2(the same as the average excess for the ramp) and whose width is the same as the distance the particle tunnels through the ramp. (a) Show that the ratio T1/T2 is e8mϕ33hM . (b) Do the methods differ more when tunnelling probability is relatively high or relatively low?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)Proved

(b) The ratio will have the largest value, i.e., the probabilities differ the most when the argument of the exponential is large or when the tunnelling probability is small.

Step by step solution

01

Concept involved

Tunnelling is a phenomenon when a particle propagates through a potential barrier when the potential energy of the barrier is higher than the kinetic energy of the particle.

Tunneling Probability is the ratio of squared amplitudes of the waves after crossing the barrier to the incident waves.

02

Step 2(a): Determining value of the ratio T1/T2

The potential energy is modelled as,

Ux-E=Ï•-Mx

If the particle enters where x = 0 and exits where E = U, or x=Ï•/M.

Hence, by method 1, tunnelling probability is given by

role="math" localid="1660047829428" T1≅e-2h∫0ϕ/M2mϕ/Mxdx=e-2h2mϕ/Mx323Mm0ϕ/M=e-2h8mϕ33M

Also, by method 2, tunnelling probability is given by

T2=e-2h2mϕ3M=e8mϕ3hM

Now the required ratio, T1/T2 can be calculated as,

T1/T2=e-2h8mϕ33M+8mϕ3hM=e8mϕ33M

Hence, the ratio T1/T2 is obtained as e8mϕ33M.

03

Step 3(b): Difference between the methods

As it can be clearly seen from the ratio obtained in the previous step, the ratio will have the largest value, i.e., the probabilities differ the most when the argument of the exponential is large or when the tunnelling probability is small.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the E>U0 potential barrier, the reflection, and transmission probabilities are the ratios:

R=B*BA*AT=F*FA*A

Where A, B, and F are multiplicative coefficients of the incident, reflected, and transmitted waves. From the four smoothness conditions, solve for B and F in terms of A, insert them in R and T ratios, and thus derive equations (6-12).

Given the same particle energy and barrier height and width, which would tunnel more readily: a proton or an electron? Is this consistent with the usual rule of thumb governing whether classical or non-classical behavior should prevail?

Fusion in the Sun: Without tunnelling. our Sun would fail us. The source of its energy is nuclear fusion. and a crucial step is the fusion of a light-hydrogen nucleus, which is just a proton, and a heavy-hydrogen nucleus. which is of the same charge but twice the mass. When these nuclei get close enough. their short-range attraction via the strong force overcomes their Coulomb repulsion. This allows them to stick together, resulting in a reduced total mass/internal energy and a consequent release of kinetic energy. However, the Sun's temperature is simply too low to ensure that nuclei move fast enough to overcome their repulsion.

a) By equating the average thermal kinetic energy that the nuclei would have when distant,32KBT. and the Coulomb potential energy they would have when 2fm apart, roughly the separation at which they stick, show that a temperature of about 1019K would be needed.

b) The Sun's core is only about 10k. If nuclei can’t make it "over the top." they must tunnel. Consider the following model, illustrated in the figure: One nucleus is fixed at the origin, while the other approaches from far away with energyE. As rdecreases, the Coulomb potential energy increases, until the separation ris roughly the nuclear radius rnuc. Whereupon the potential energy is Umaxand then quickly drops down into a very deep "hole" as the strong-force attraction takes over. Given then E≪Umax, the point b, where tunnelling must begin. will be very large compared with rnuc, so we approximate the barrier's width Las simply b. Its height, U0, we approximate by the Coulomb potential evaluated at b2. Finally. for the energy Ewhich fixes b, let us use 4×32KBT. which is a reasonable limit, given the natural range of speeds in a thermodynamic system.Combining these approximations, show that the exponential factor in the wide-barrier tunnelling probability is

exp[-e24πε0h4m3kBT]

c)Using the proton mass for , evaluate this factor for a temperature of107K. Then evaluate it at3000K. about that of an incandescent filament or hot flame. and rather high by Earth standards. Discuss the consequences.

What fraction of a beam of 50eVelectrons would get through a 200V1nm wide electrostatic barrier?

A beam of particles of energy E incident upon a potential step ofU0=(5/4)E is described by wave function:ψinc(x)=eikx

  1. Determine the reflected wave and wave inside the step by enforcing the required continuity conditions to obtain their (possibly complex) amplitudes.
  2. Verify the explicit calculation the ratio of reflected probability density to the incident probability density is 1.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.