/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q49E As we learned in example 4.2, in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

As we learned in example 4.2, in a Gaussian function of the form(x)e-(x2/22)is the standard deviation or uncertainty in position.The probability density for gaussian wave function would be proportional to(x)squared:e-(x2/22). Comparing with the timedependentGaussian probability of equation (6-35), we see that the uncertainty in position of the time-evolving Gaussian wave function of a free particle is given by

.x=1+h2t24m24 That is, it starts atand increases with time. Suppose the wave function of an electron is initially determined to be a Gaussian ofuncertainty. How long will it take for the uncertainty in the electron's position to reach5m, the length of a typical automobile?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The time required to reach length of an automobile is0.043s

Step by step solution

01

 Given conditions

Gaussian function of the form(x)e-x2/22is the standard deviation or uncertainty in position.

The probability density would be proportional to(x)squared:e-x2/22.

The uncertainty in position of the time-evolving Gaussian wave function of a free particle is given by

x=1+h2t24m24

=500nm=(500nm)10-9mnm=510-7m

02

 Formula used

The formula for uncertainty in the position from the previous step can be rewritten in the following form.

t=x2-14m24h2 ... (1)

Where,

is standard deviation or uncertainty in position, is the mass of an electron 9.1110-31kg, t is the time require for an electron to reach the length of an automobilex, h is the Planck constant1.05410-34J.s

03

 Determining required time

Substitute the values from previous step,

510-7mfor , 9.1110-31kgfor m, 5m forx in equation (1) to solve t

t=x2-14m24h2=5m510-7m2-149.1110-31kg2510-7m41.05410-34J.s2=0.043s

Therefore, the time required to reach length of an automobile is 0.043s

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A ball is thrown straight up at 25ms-1. Someone asks 鈥淚gnoring air resistance. What is the probability of the ball tunneling to a height of1000m?鈥 Explain why this is not an example of tunneling as discussed in this chapter, even if the ball were replaced with a small fundamental particle. (The fact that the potential energy varies with position is not the whole answer-passing through nonrectangular barriers is still tunnelirl8.)

Exercise 39 gives a condition for resonant tunneling through two barriers separated by a space width of2s, expressed I terms of factorgiven in exercise 30. Show that in the limit in which barrier widthL, this condition becomes exactly energy quantization condition (5.22) for finite well. Thus, resonant tunneling occurs at the quantized energies of intervening well.

Could the situation depicted in the following diagram represent a particle in a bound state? Explain.

Exercise 54 gives a rough lifetime for a particle trapped particle to escape an enclosure by tunneling.

(a) Consider an electron. Given thatW=100鈥塶尘,L=1鈥塶尘鈥夆塧nd鈥夆U0=5鈥塭痴, first verify that theEGS<<U0assumption holds, then evaluate the lifetime.

(b) Repeat part (a), but for a0.1gparticle, withW=1nm,L=1m, and a barrier heightU0that equals the energy the particle would have if its speed were just1鈥尘尘辫别谤测别补谤.

The potential energy barrier in field emission is not rectangular, but resembles a ramp, as shown in Figure 6.16. Here we compare tunnelling probability calculated by the crudest approximation to that calculated by a better one. In method 1, calculate T by treating the barrier as an actual ramp in which U - E is initially, but falls off with a slop of M. Use the formula given in Exercise 37. In method 2, the cruder one, assume a barrier whose height exceeds E by a constant /2(the same as the average excess for the ramp) and whose width is the same as the distance the particle tunnels through the ramp. (a) Show that the ratio T1/T2 is e8m33hM . (b) Do the methods differ more when tunnelling probability is relatively high or relatively low?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.