/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q24E Consider a potential barrier of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider a potential barrier of height 30eV. (a) Find a width around1.000nmfor which there will be no reflection of 35eVelectrons incident upon the barrier. (b) What would be the reflection probability for 36eVelectrons incident upon the same barrier? (Note: This corresponds to a difference in speed of less than1(1/2)%.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The width is 1.098nmand the reflection probability is0.475.

Step by step solution

01

Definition:

Tunneling defines the penetration of a barrier of high energy by a low-energy wave or particle. For no reflection,E>U. This is called resonant transmission.

E=U0+n2π2∅22mL2

Reflection probability or reflection coefficient is defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the reflected wave to that of the incident wave.

R=sin22m(E+U0)L∅sin22m(E+U0)L∅+4EU0EU0+1

02

Given/known parameters

E=35eVandU=30eV

03

Solution

(a)nL=2m(E-U)Ï€

nL=2×9.1×10-31×35-30×1.6×10-19J/eV3.14×1.05×10-34

nL=3.64×109

If L=1nm,n=3.64. Rounding off to the nearest integral value,n=4.This gives L=1.098nm.

(b)Putting values in reflection formula:

R=sin22×9.1×10-31(36-30)×1.6×10-19×1.0981.05×10-34in22×9.1×10-31(36-30)×1.6×10-19×1.0981.05×10-34+4(3630)3630-1

R=0.475

04

Explanation and Conclusion

For a barrier width of1.098nm,no reflection will take place.

Reflection coefficient for36eVbeam is 0.475. It is quite small, which means the window for resonant transmission can be small.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The plot below shows the variation of ω with k for electrons in a simple crystal. Where, if anywhere, does the group velocity exceed the phase velocity? (Sketching straight lines from the origin may help.) The trend indicated by a dashed curve is parabolic, but it is interrupted by a curious discontinuity, known as a band gap (see Chapter 10), where there are no allowed frequencies/energies. It turns out that the second derivative ofω with respect to k is inversely proportional to the effective mass of the electron. Argue that in this crystal, the effective mass is the same for most values of k, but that it is different for some values and in one region in a very strange way.

The potential energy barrier in field emission is not rectangular, but resembles a ramp, as shown in Figure 6.16. Here we compare tunnelling probability calculated by the crudest approximation to that calculated by a better one. In method 1, calculate T by treating the barrier as an actual ramp in which U - E is initiallyϕ, but falls off with a slop of M. Use the formula given in Exercise 37. In method 2, the cruder one, assume a barrier whose height exceeds E by a constant ϕ/2(the same as the average excess for the ramp) and whose width is the same as the distance the particle tunnels through the ramp. (a) Show that the ratio T1/T2 is e8mϕ33hM . (b) Do the methods differ more when tunnelling probability is relatively high or relatively low?

As we learned in example 4.2, in a Gaussian function of the formψ(x)αe-(x2/2ε2)is the standard deviation or uncertainty in position.The probability density for gaussian wave function would be proportional toψ(x)squared:e-(x2/2ε2). Comparing with the timedependentGaussian probability of equation (6-35), we see that the uncertainty in position of the time-evolving Gaussian wave function of a free particle is given by

.Δx=ε1+h2t24m2ε4 That is, it starts atand increases with time. Suppose the wave function of an electron is initially determined to be a Gaussian ofuncertainty. How long will it take for the uncertainty in the electron's position to reach5 m, the length of a typical automobile?

Fusion in the Sun: Without tunnelling. our Sun would fail us. The source of its energy is nuclear fusion. and a crucial step is the fusion of a light-hydrogen nucleus, which is just a proton, and a heavy-hydrogen nucleus. which is of the same charge but twice the mass. When these nuclei get close enough. their short-range attraction via the strong force overcomes their Coulomb repulsion. This allows them to stick together, resulting in a reduced total mass/internal energy and a consequent release of kinetic energy. However, the Sun's temperature is simply too low to ensure that nuclei move fast enough to overcome their repulsion.

a) By equating the average thermal kinetic energy that the nuclei would have when distant,32KBT. and the Coulomb potential energy they would have when 2fm apart, roughly the separation at which they stick, show that a temperature of about 1019K would be needed.

b) The Sun's core is only about 10k. If nuclei can’t make it "over the top." they must tunnel. Consider the following model, illustrated in the figure: One nucleus is fixed at the origin, while the other approaches from far away with energyE. As rdecreases, the Coulomb potential energy increases, until the separation ris roughly the nuclear radius rnuc. Whereupon the potential energy is Umaxand then quickly drops down into a very deep "hole" as the strong-force attraction takes over. Given then E≪Umax, the point b, where tunnelling must begin. will be very large compared with rnuc, so we approximate the barrier's width Las simply b. Its height, U0, we approximate by the Coulomb potential evaluated at b2. Finally. for the energy Ewhich fixes b, let us use 4×32KBT. which is a reasonable limit, given the natural range of speeds in a thermodynamic system.Combining these approximations, show that the exponential factor in the wide-barrier tunnelling probability is

exp[-e24πε0h4m3kBT]

c)Using the proton mass for , evaluate this factor for a temperature of107K. Then evaluate it at3000K. about that of an incandescent filament or hot flame. and rather high by Earth standards. Discuss the consequences.

Show that the quite general wave group given in equation (6-21) is a solution of the free-particle Schrödinger equation, provided that each plane wave's w does satisfy the matter-wave dispersion relation given in (6-23).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.