/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 80E The fact that a laser's resonant... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The fact that a laser's resonant cavity so effectively sharpens the wavelength can lead to the output of several closely spaced laser wavelengths, called longitudinal modes. Here we see how. Suppose the spontaneous emission serving as the seed for stimulated emission is of wavelength , but somewhat fuzzy, with a line width of roughly0.001nm either side of the central value. The resonant cavity is exactly60cm long. (a) How many wavelengths fit the standing-wave condition'? (b) If only u single wavelength were desired, would change the length of the cavity help? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Six different wavelengths would fit the condition.
  2. The length of the resonant cavity would have to be L<20cm.

Step by step solution

01

The standing wave condition

A standing wave, also called a stationary wave, a combination of two waves moving in opposite directions, each having the same amplitude and frequency.

The standing wave condition is given by

L=²Ôλ2 ….. (1)

Where, is the length of the cavity, is the wavelength, and is number of wavelengths.

n=2Lλ ….. (2)

λ1−λ0>d ….. (3)

Here, λ0 is the base wavelength of light, λ1 is the wavelength of a longitudinal mode, and is the half-line width of the emission line.

02

Number of wavelengths fitting the standing wave condition

Shorter wavelengths are formed when line width is added to wavelength of stimulated emission

λ=633nm+0.001nm1×10−9m1nm=633.001×10−9m

Longer wavelengths are formed when line width is subtracted from wavelength of stimulated emission

λ'=633nm−0.001nm1×10−9m1nm=632.999×10−9m

Cavity length shall be converted to standard units:

L=60cm1m100cm=0.6m

To get the number of half wavelengths of a somewhat shorter wavelength would fit the condition; substitute 633.001nm for λ and 0.6m for L in equation (2).

n=2(0.6m)633.001×10−9m=1,895,731.6

So, 1,895,732 half wavelength somewhat shorter wavelength would fit the condition

To find the number of loner wave lengths, substitute 632.999nmλ for λ'and 0.6m for L in equation (1).

n=2(0.6m)632.999×10−9m=18,95,737.6

So, 1,895,732 half wavelength somewhat shorter wavelength would fit the condition

The difference between the numbers of waves in the first to second situation is,

Δ²Ô=1,895,737.6−1,895,731.6=6

03

The length of resonant cavity

To use that though, equation (1) will first be rewritten to solve for the wavelength:

L=²Ôλ2λ=2Ln

That can then be inserted in for the â‹„1 in equation (3).

λ1−λ0>d2Ln1−λ0>d

The λ0 can stay as is because the value of that is known. The n1 will differ from the base value of n by just 1, to show that an additional sized wavelength fitting inside the resonant cavity. In order for the λ1 to be larger than λ0, the denominator will have to be smaller. Thus 1 will be subtracted from the n for the n1 :

2Ln−1−λ0>d

That can be rearranged to get rid of the fraction:

L>n−1λ0+d

However, the n can be filled in with equation (2) for the number of the original wavelengths that will satisfy the standing wave condition:

2L>2Lλ0−1λ0+d

Then multiply that out, and collect the L's:

2L>2L+2Ldλ0−λ0−dλ0+d>2Ldλ0λ02dλ0+d>L

Or just:

L<λ02dλ0+d

And that gives what the length of the resonant cavity should be so that no longitudinal modes appear. To evaluate that, just fill 6.33×10−7m for the l0 and 1×1012m for d:

L<6.33×10−7m21×10−12m6.33×10−7m+1×10−12mL<0.2003m

That can be converted to :

Hence, the length of the resonant cavity would have to be .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Fermi velocityVfis defined byEF=12msF2, whereEFis the Fermi energy. The Fermi energy for conduction electron in sodium is 3 IV. (a) Calculate the Fermis velocity (b) What would be the wavelength of an electron with this velocity? (c) If each sodium atom contributes one conduction electron to the electron gas and sodium atom are spaced roughly0.37nmapart. If it is necessary, by the criteria of equation (9-43), to treat the conduction electron gas as quantum gas?

The entropy of an ideal monatomic gas is(3/2)NkBlnE+,NkBlnV-NkBlnN to within an additive constant. Show that this implies the correct relationship between internal energy Eand temperature.

The exact probabilities of equation (9-9) rest on the claim that the number of ways of addingNdistinct non-negative integer to give a total ofM is (M+N-1)![M!(N-1)!] . One way to prove it involves the following trick. It represents two ways that Ndistinct integers can add toM-9 and5, respectively. In this special case.

The X's represent the total of the integers, M-each row has 5. The 1'srepresent "dividers" between the distinct integers of which there will of course be N-Ieach row has8 . The first row says thatn1 is3 (three X'sbefore the divider between it andn2 ), n2is0 (noX's between its left divider withn1 and its right divider withn3 ),n3 ) is1 . n4throughn6 are0 , n7is1 , and n8and n9are0 . The second row says that n2is 2. n6is 1, n9is2 , and all othern are0 . Further rows could account for all possible ways that the integers can add toM . Argue that properly applied, the binomial coefficient (discussed in AppendixJ ) can be invoked to give the correct total number of ways for anyN andM .

Derivation of equation(9−40): Our model for calculatingE¯is equation (9-26), whose denominator is the total number of particlesNand whose numerator is the total energy of the system, which we here callUtotal. State with the denominator:

N=∫0∞N(E)∩(E)dE

Insert the quantum gas density of states and an expression for the distribution. using±to distinguish the Bose-Einstein from the Fermi-Dirac. Then change variables:E=y2, and factorBe+r2/kUTout of the denominator. In the integrand will be a factor

(1∓1Be−y2/kBT)−1

Using,(l∓ε)−1≅1±ε a sum of two integrals results, each of Gaussian form. The integral thus becomes two terms in powers of1/B. Repeat the process. but instead find an expression forUtotalin terms of1/B, using

U|ntal=∫0∞EN(E)D(E)dE

Divide your expression forUtotalby that forN. both in terms of1/B. Now1/Bcan safely be eliminated by using the lowest-order expression forNin terms of1/B.

(a) Show that the number of photons per unit volume in a photon gas of temperature Tis approximately(2×107K−3m−3)T3⋅(Note:∫0∞x2(ex−1)−1dx≅2.40.)

(b)Combine this with a result derived in Example 9.6 to show that the average photon energy in a cavity at temperatureTis given byE¯≅2.7kBT.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.