/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q7CQ Your friends ask: 鈥淲hy is ther... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Your friends ask: 鈥淲hy is there an exclusion principle?鈥 Explain in the simplest terms.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The two electrons cannot have all quantum numbers the same including spin, and cannot be in the same one-electron states.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction.

If a system of particles comprises electrons or a system of protons, then the particles are said to be identical when interchanging any of the two particles of the same kind does not change anything about the system. It means the magnitude-squared of the wave function, which gives the probability density, must remain the same when the coordinates of any two electrons are interchanged.

If the wave function involves a pair of particles each in one of two different one-electron states, interchanging the particles (putting each in the state of the other) and doing it again multiplies the wave function with any spin included. This is possible only if a single exchange of particles multiples the wave function or by or.

For electrons, and other particles with half-integer spins, interchanging the quantum numbers of the two electrons always multiplies the wave function.

02

for electrons and other particles with half-integer spin.

Symbolically, changing the quantum numbers of the two electrons must change the sign,

n,n'(rI2r2)=n',n(rI2r2)

Here, denotes the first set of one-electron quantum number and n'the second electron鈥檚 set of quantum numbers. But if the two electrons have all the same quantum numbers, the wave function becomes role="math" localid="1655379141692" n,n(r1r2)and the requirements that exchanging quantum numbers,

n,n'(r1,r2)=-n.n(r1,r2)

This requires the impossible condition that n,n(r1r2)is identically zero.

Conclusion: Therefore, The two electrons cannot have all quantum numbers the same including spin, and cannot be in the same one-electron states.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What angles might the intrinsic angular momentum vector make with the z-axis for a deuteron? (See Table 8.1)

Identify the different total angular momentum states j,mj allowed a 3d electron in a hydrogen atom.

A Simple Model: The multielectron atom is unsolvable, but simple models go a long way. Section7.8gives energies and orbit radii forone-electron/hydrogenlike atoms. Let us see how useful these are by considering lithium.

(a) Treat one of lithium'sn=1electrons as a single electron in a one-electron atom ofrole="math" localid="1659948261120" Z=3. Find the energy and orbit radius.

(b) The othern=1electron being in the same spatial state. must have the same energy and radius, but we must account for the repulsion between these electrons. Assuming they are roughly one orbit diameter apart, what repulsive energy would they share, and if each claims half this energy. what would be the energies of these two electrons?

(c) Approximately what charge does lithium's lone valence electron orbit, and what radius and energy would it have?

(d) Is in reasonable to dismiss the role of then=1electrons in chemical reactions?

(e) The actual energies of lithium's electrons are about-98eV(twice, of course) and-5.4eV. How good is the model?

(f) Why should the model's prediction for the valence electron's energy differ in the direction it does from the actual value?

Figureshows the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. It reveals that spin-12particles have just two possible spin states. Assume that when these two beams are separated inside the channel (though still near its centreline). we can choose to block one or the other for study. Now a second such apparatus is added after the first. Their channels are aligned. But the second one is rotated about the-axis by an angle \(\phi\) from the first. Suppose we block the spin-down beam in the first apparatus, allowing only the spin-up beam into the second. There is no wave function for spin. but we can still talk of a probability amplitude, which we square to give a probability. After the first apparatus' spin-up beam passes through the second apparatus, the probability amplitude iscos(/2)2nd+sin(/2)2ndwhere the arrows indicate the two possible findings for spin in the second apparatus.

(a) What is the probability of finding the particle spin up in the second apparatus? Of finding it spin down? Argue that these probabilities make sense individually for representative values ofand their sum is also sensible.

(b) By contrasting this spin probability amplitude with a spatial probability amplitude. Such as(x)=Aete2. Argue that although the arbitrariness ofgives the spin cases an infinite number of solves. it is still justified to refer to it as a "two-state system," while the spatial case is an infinite-state system.

Using f2=L2+S2+2L-Sto eliminate L - S. as wellas L=l(l+1)h,S=s(s+1)andj(j+1)h, obtain equation (8- 32 )from the equation that precedes it.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.