/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q53E Consider row 4 of the periodic t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider row 4 of the periodic table. The trend is that the4xsubshell fills. Then the 3d, then the 4p.

(a) Judging by adherence to and deviation from this trend, whit might be said of the energy difference between the 4sand 3drelative to that between the 3dand 4p?

(b) Is this also true of row 5?

(c) Are these observations in qualitative agreement with Figure 8.13? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)r1=0.054a0,r2=0.3a0,r3=1.64a0,r4=16a0

(b) The resultant answer is yes.

(c) The resultant answer is no.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

n=1,2,3,4For the electron in potassium.

02

Concept of Atomic radii

Expression for atomic radii rnis given by,rn=n2a0Z

Where,Z represents number of protons,n represents principal quantum number anda0represents Bohr radius.

03

Determine the equation

(a)

For the n=1electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus and half of the other n=1electron, the effective Z that the electron would see would be 18.5, since 19-0.5=18.5. That can then be used in the radii equation, along with being 1:

r1=(1)2a0(18.5)r1=0.054a0

For the n=2electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1 s electrons, and half of the seven othersn=2 electrons, the effective Z that the electron would see would be 13.5 (since 19-2 -3.5=18.5). that can then be used in the radii equation, along with being 2:

r2=(2)2a0(13.5)r2=0.296a0

For then=3electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1s electrons, all eight of the n=2 electrons, and half of the seven other electrons, the effective Z that the electron would see would be 5.5 (since 19-2-8-3.5=5.5 ). that can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 3:

r3=(3)2a0(5.5)r3=1.636a0

For the â–µn=4electron, if it orbits the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1s electrons, all eight of the n=2 electrons, and all eight of the n=3 electrons, the effective that the electron would see would be 1 (since 19-2-8-8=1). That can then be used in the radii equation, along with being 4:

r4=(4)2a0Ir4=16a0

04

Determine the radii

(b)

Calculate the radii

r1=0.054a00.0529nma0r1=2.86×10-3nmr2=0.3a00.0529nma0r2=1.59×10-2nm

Similarly, calculate further:

r3=1.64a00.0529nma0r3=8.67×10-2nm

05

Determine the equation

(c)

The atomic orbit radius equation can be used to estimate the effective Z that the valence electron sees, using 0.22nmfor thernfor the n and 0.0529nmfor thea0 after solving for Z :

Z=n2a0rnZ=(4)2(0.0529nm)(0.22nm)Z=3.85

So since in the valence electron orbits an effective Z of 1 in the original model, and it would need to orbit an effective $Z$ of $3.85$ based just on the experimental radius, there would need to be $3.8$ more protons be "unscreened"

The valence electron of potassium is in the s-shell, and consequently will have a roughly elliptical orbit. Therefore, it will spend part of its time near the nucleus, inside the orbits of the lower n electrons.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 44 gives an antisymmetric multiparticle state for two particles in a box with opposite spins. Another antisymmetric state with spins opposite and the same quantum numbers is ψn(x1)↓n2(x2)↑−ψnn(x1)↑ψn(x2)↓

Refer to these states as 1 and 11. We have tended to characterize exchange symmetry as to whether the state's sign changes when we swap particle labels. but we could achieve the same result by instead swapping the particles' stares, specifically theandin equation (8-22). In this exercise. we look at swapping only parts of the state-spatial or spin.

(a) What is the exchange symmetric-symmetric (unchanged). antisymmetric (switching sign). or neither-of multiparticle states 1 and Itwith respect to swapping spatial states alone?

(b) Answer the same question. but with respect to swapping spin states/arrows alone.

(c) Show that the algebraic sum of states I and II may be written(ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)−ψn'(x1)ψn(x2))(↓↑+↑↓)

Where the left arrow in any couple represents the spin of particle 1 and the right arrow that of particle?

(d) Answer the same questions as in parts (a) and (b), but for this algebraic sum.

(e) ls the sum of states I and 11 still antisymmetric if we swap the particles' total-spatial plus spin-states?


(f) if the two particles repel each other, would any of the three multiparticle states-l. II. and the sum-be preferred?

Explain.

Question: Huge tables of characteristic X-rays start at lithium. Why not hydrogen or helium?

Question: What if electrons were spin32 instead of spin 12. What would be Z for the first noble gas?

To investigate the claim that lowerimplies lower f energy. consider a simple case: lithium. which has twon=1electrons and alonen=2valence electron.

(a)First find the approximate orbit radius, in terms ofa0. of ann=1electron orbiting three protons. (Refer to Section 7.8.)

(b) Assuming then=1electrons shield/cancel out two of the protons in lithium's nucleus, the orbit radius of ann=2electron orbiting a net charge of just+e.

(c) Argue that lithium's valence electron should certainly have lower energy in a 25 state than in a2pstale. (Refer Figure 7.15.)

Slater Determinant: A convenient and compact way of expressing multi-particle states of anti-symmetric character for many fermions is the Slater determinant:

|ψn1x1m31ψn2x1m32ψn3x1m33···ψnNx1msNψn1x2m11ψn2x2m32ψn3x2m33···ψψn1x2msNψn3x3m31ψn2x3m12ψn3x3m33ψnNx3msN···············ψn1xNm11ψn2xNm32ψn3xNm33···ψnNxNmsN|

It is based on the fact that for N fermions there must be Ndifferent individual-particle states, or sets of quantum numbers. The ith state has spatial quantum numbers (which might be ni,ℓi, and mfi) represented simply byni and spin quantum number msi. Were it occupied by the ith particle, the slate would beψni(xj)msi a column corresponds to a given state and a row to a given particle. For instance, the first column corresponds to individual particle state ψn(xj)ms1. Where jprogresses (through the rows) from particle 1 to particle N. The first row corresponds to particle I. which successively occupies all individual-particle states (progressing through the columns). (a) What property of determinants ensures that the multiparticle state is 0 if any two individual particle states are identical? (b) What property of determinants ensures that switching the labels on any two particles switches the sign of the multiparticle state?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.