/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}

91影视

The radius of cesium is roughly0.26nm.

(a) From this estimate the effective charge its valence electron orbits

(b) Given the nature of the electron's orbit. is this effective nuclearcharge reasonable?

(c) Compare this effective Zwith that obtained for sodium in Example 8.3. Are the values at odds with the evidence given in Figure8.16that it takes less energy to remove an electron from cesium than from sodium? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The resultant answer is+ 7.3 e

(b) Yes, the elliptical orbit of the valence electron brings it closer to the nucleus.

(c) Yes, because we neglected the repulsion from the inner cloud electrons in each case.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

Radius of cesium atom0.26nm

02

Concept of Atomic radii

Expression for atomic radii rnis given by,rn=n2a0Z

Where, Zrepresents number of protons,represents principal quantum number anda0represents Bohr radius.

03

Determine the equation

(a)

The equation is solved for Z, then use 1 for n, 0.26 nm forrn,0.0529nm for a0, and 6 for n :

rn=n2a0ZZ=n2a0rnZ=(6)2(0.0529nm)(0.26nm)Z=7.32

04

Determine the equation

(b)

If all the inner electrons screened the nucleus, the valence electron would just see an effective of 1. But since the valence electron for cesium is in an s-shell, that means that its orbit is very elliptical, thus bypassing some of the inner electrons, and thus increasing the effective that the valence electron sees. So, an effective of 7.32 for the valence electron is plausible.

05

Determine the equation

(c)

Even though the valence electron in cesium sees an effective of 7.32, whereas sodium's valence electron sees as of 2.7, the ionization energy of cesium is still lower than that of, sodium. This can be partially explained by the additional repulsive energy between the valence electron and all the other electrons in cesium as compared to sodium. With the repulsive energy between the valence electron and other electrons, it lessens the amount of energy that is needed to remove the outer electron from the atom, since the energy between the electrons adds to the valence electrons total energy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Lithium is chemically reactive. What if electrons were spin 32instead of spin12. What value of Z would result in an elements reactive in roughly the same way as lithium? What if electrons were instead spin-1?

The subatomic omega particle has spin s=32. What angles might its intrinsic angular in momentum vector make with the z-axis?

As is done for helium in Table 8.3, determine for a carbon atom the various states allowed according to LS coupling. The coupling is between carbon's two 2p electrons (its filled 2s subshell not participating), one or which always remains in the 2p state. Consider cases in which the other is as high as the 3d level. (Note: Well both electrons are in the 2p, the exclusion principle restricts the number of states. The only allowed states are those in whichandlT are both even or both odd).

Whether adding spins to get total spin, spin and orbit to get total angular momentum, or total angular momenta to get a "grand total" angular momentum, addition rules are always the same: Given J1=j1(j1+1)andJ2=j2(j2+1) . Where is an angular momentum (orbital. spin. or total) and a quantum number. the total isJT=jT(jT+1) , where jTmay take on any value between |j1-j2|and j1+j2in integral steps: and for each value ofJJTz=mf . where mmay take on any of2jr+I possible values in integral steps from-jT for +jTSince separately there would be 2j1+1possible values form11 and2j2+ I form2 . the total number of stales should be(2j1+1)(2j2+1) . Prove it: that is, show that the sum of the2jT+1 values formit over all the allowed values forj7 is (2j1+1)(2j2+1). (Note: Here we prove in general what we verified in Example 8.5for the specialcase j1=3,j2=12.)

Were it to follow the standard pattern, what would be the electronic configuration of element 119.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.