/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q46E Exercise 45 refers to state I an... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exercise 45 refers to state I and II and put their algebraic sum in a simple form. (a) Determine algebraic difference of state I and state II.

(b) Determine whether after swapping spatial state and spin state separately, the algebraic difference of state I and state II is symmetric, antisymmetric or neither, and to check whether the algebraic difference becomes antisymmetric after swapping spatial and spin states both.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The resultant answer is.ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(↑↓-↓↑)

(b) The algebraic difference is symmetric in the spatial part and antisymmetric in the spin state; yes, the algebraic difference is antisymmetric under swapping the particles' total states-spatial plus spin.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The algebraic difference of states is given.

02

Concept of Determinant

The energy of electron innth-orbit:E=Z2-13.6eVn2

The energy KE which an object of charge q gains by passing through the potential differenceΔVis KE=qΔV.

03

Determine the function

(a)

Let's start by writing down our states I and II.

ψIx1,x2=ψnx1↑ψn'x2↓-ψn'x1↓ψnx2↑ψΠx1,x2=ψnx1↓ψn'x2↑-ψn'x1↑ψnx2↓

Taking the difference between these states gives us

04

Determine the function

(b)

Starting with the algebraic difference of part (a), we swap the spatial states-the n and n-alone and show that

ψI-II'x1,x2=ψn'x1ψnx2+ψnx1ψn'x2(↑↓-↓↑)ψI-II'x1,x2=ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(↑↓-↓↑)ψI-II'x1,x2=ψI-Πx1,x2

Thus, we find that the algebraic difference is symmetric with respect to swapping spatial states.

Similarly, starting from the algebraic difference again and swapping spin states/arrows alone this time, we have

ψI-II'x1,x2=ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(↓↑-↑↓)ψI-II'x1,x2=-ψnx1ψn'x2-ψn'x1ψnx2(↑↓-↓↑)ψI-II'x1,x2=-ψI-IIx1,x2

05

Simplify the function

We see thatψI-ΠI is anti symmetric with respect to swapping spin states alone.

ψI-II=ψn'x1ψnx2+ψnx1ψn'x2(↓↑-↑↓)ψI-II=-ψnx1ψn'x2+ψn'x1ψnx2(↑↓-↓↑)ψI-II=-ψI-II

which shows that the algebraic difference is still antisymmetric if we swap the particles' total states. This result should be expected for we know that the algebraic difference between two antisymmetric pieces-states I and II-results in an antisymmetric state. Note that the same results apply for the algebraic difference ψII - I..

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Huge tables of characteristic X-rays start at lithium. Why not hydrogen or helium?

Question: Solving (or attempting to solve!) a 4-electron problem is not twice as hard as solving a 2-electrons problem. Would you guess it to be more or less than twice as hard? Why?

A Simple Model: The multielectron atom is unsolvable, but simple models go a long way. Section7.8gives energies and orbit radii forone-electron/hydrogenlike atoms. Let us see how useful these are by considering lithium.

(a) Treat one of lithium'sn=1electrons as a single electron in a one-electron atom ofrole="math" localid="1659948261120" Z=3. Find the energy and orbit radius.

(b) The othern=1electron being in the same spatial state. must have the same energy and radius, but we must account for the repulsion between these electrons. Assuming they are roughly one orbit diameter apart, what repulsive energy would they share, and if each claims half this energy. what would be the energies of these two electrons?

(c) Approximately what charge does lithium's lone valence electron orbit, and what radius and energy would it have?

(d) Is in reasonable to dismiss the role of then=1electrons in chemical reactions?

(e) The actual energies of lithium's electrons are about-98eV(twice, of course) and-5.4eV. How good is the model?

(f) Why should the model's prediction for the valence electron's energy differ in the direction it does from the actual value?

Question: As the 2p levels fill from Z = 5 to 10 the element's first ionization energies tend to increase. But as the figure below clearly indicates it is slightly easier to remove an electron from Z = 8 oxygen than from Z = 7 nitrogen. What might explain this?

The radius of cesium is roughly0.26nm.

(a) From this estimate the effective charge its valence electron orbits

(b) Given the nature of the electron's orbit. is this effective nuclearcharge reasonable?

(c) Compare this effective Zwith that obtained for sodium in Example 8.3. Are the values at odds with the evidence given in Figure8.16that it takes less energy to remove an electron from cesium than from sodium? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.