/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11P Calculate the lifetime (in secon... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Calculate the lifetime (in seconds) for each of the four n = 2 states of hydrogen. Hint: You鈥檒l need to evaluate matrix elements of the form <100x200>,<100y211>, and so on. Remember that role="math" localid="1658303993600" x=r蝉颈苍胃肠辞蝉,y=r蝉颈苍胃蝉颈苍andz=r肠辞蝉胃. Most of these integrals are zero, so inspect them closely before you start calculating. Answer: 1.6010-9seconds for all except role="math" localid="1658304185040" 200, which is infinite.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The life time for each of the four n=2 states of hydrogen is=1A=1.6010-9s

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: states of hydrogen

At standard conditions of hydrogen is a gas of diatomic molecules having the formula H2. It is colourless, tasteless, nontoxic, and highly combustible. Hydrogen is the most abundant chemical substance in the universe, constituting roughly 75% of all normal matter

02

Step 2: Calculating the life time for each of the four n=2 states of hydrogen

In Problem 9.1 we calculated the matrix elements of z; all of them are zero except 100z210=28352a.

As for x and y, we noted that

100>,200and210>areeven(inx,y),whereas21+1>is odd. So the only non-zero matrix elements are 100x21+1and100y21+1 Using the wave functions in Problem 9.1:

100x21+1=1蟺补3+18蟺补1ae-r/are-r/2asine+irsin胃肠辞蝉r2蝉颈苍胃drdd=+18蟺补40r4e-3r/2adr0sin3d02肠辞蝉蠒+isin肠辞蝉蠒d=+18蟺补44!2a3543=+2735a

100y21+1=+18蟺补44!2a354302cos+isinsind=+18蟺补44!2a3543+i=-i2735a100r200=0;100r21027235ak^;100r21+1=2735a+i^-ij^,and21+1>100>)

Meanwhile, =E2-E1=1E14-E1=-3E14 so for the three l = 1 states:

A=-33E13263ea221531013o0魔肠3=-2938E13e2a2o04c3=21038E1mc22ca=2103813.60.5111063.001080.52910-10m=6.27108/s;=1A=1.6010-9s

Thus life time for each of the four n=2 states of hydrogen is =1A=1.6010-9s

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The first term in Equation 9.25 comes from the eit/2, and the second from e-it/2.. Thus dropping the first term is formally equivalent to writing H^=(V/2)e-it, which is to say,

cbl-ihvba0tcos(t')ei0t'dt'=-iVba2h0tej(0+)t'+ej(0-)t'dt'=--iVba2hej(0+)t'-10++ej(0-)t'-10-(9.25).Hba'=Vba2e-it,Hab'=Vab2eit(9.29).

(The latter is required to make the Hamiltonian matrix hermitian鈥攐r, if you prefer, to pick out the dominant term in the formula analogous to Equation 9.25 forca(t). ) Rabi noticed that if you make this so-called rotating wave approximation at the beginning of the calculation, Equation 9.13 can be solved exactly, with no need for perturbation theory, and no assumption about the strength of the field.

c.a=-ihHab'e-i0tcb,c.b=-ihHba'e-i0tca,

(a) Solve Equation 9.13 in the rotating wave approximation (Equation 9.29), for the usual initial conditions: ca(0)=1,cb(0)=0. Express your results (ca(t)andcb(t))in terms of the Rabi flopping frequency,

r=12(-0)2+(Vab/h)2 (9.30).

(b) Determine the transition probability,Pab(t), and show that it never exceeds 1. Confirm that.

ca(t)2+cb(t)2=1.

(c) Check that Pab(t)reduces to the perturbation theory result (Equation 9.28) when the perturbation is 鈥渟mall,鈥 and state precisely what small means in this context, as a constraint on V.

Pab(t)=cb(t)2Vab2hsin20-t/20-2(9.28)

(d) At what time does the system first return to its initial state?


Develop time-dependent perturbation theory for a multi-level system, starting with the generalization of Equations 9.1 and 9.2:

H^0n=Enn,鈥夆赌夆赌nm=nm (9.79)

At time t = 0 we turn on a perturbation H'(t)so that the total Hamiltonian is

H^=H^0+H^'(t)(9.80).

(a) Generalize Equation 9.6 to read

(t)=ca(t)aeiEat/+cb(t)beiEbt/(9.81).

and show that

cm=incnHmn'ei(EmEn)t/ (9.82).

Where

Hmn'm|H^'|n (9.83).

(b) If the system starts out in the state N, show that (in first-order perturbation theory)

cN(t)1i0tHNN'(t')dt'(9.84).

and

cm(t)i0tHmN'(t')ei(EmEN)t'/dt',鈥夆赌夆赌(mN)(9.85).

(c) For example, supposeH^'is constant (except that it was turned on at t = 0 , and switched off again at some later time . Find the probability of transition from state N to state M (MN),as a function of T. Answer:

4|HMN'|2sin2[(ENEM)T/2](ENEM)2 (9.86).

(d) Now supposeH^'is a sinusoidal function of timeH^'=Vcos(t): Making the usual assumptions, show that transitions occur only to states with energy EM=EN, and the transition probability is

PNM=|VMN|2sin2[(ENEM)T/2](ENEM)2 (9.87).

(e) Suppose a multi-level system is immersed in incoherent electromagnetic radiation. Using Section 9.2.3 as a guide, show that the transition rate for stimulated emission is given by the same formula (Equation 9.47) as for a two-level system.

Rba=302||2(0)Rb (9.47).

Solve Equation 9.13 for the case of a time-independent perturbation, assumingthatandcheck that

. Comment: Ostensibly, this system oscillates between 鈥溾 Doesn鈥檛 this contradict my general assertion that no transitions occur for time-independent perturbations? No, but the reason is rather subtle: In this are not, and never were, Eigen states of the Hamiltonian鈥攁 measurement of the energy never yields. In time-dependent perturbation theory we typically contemplate turning on the perturbation for a while, and then turning it off again, in order to examine the system. At the beginning, and at the end,are Eigen states of the exact Hamiltonian, and only in this context does it make sense to say that the system underwent a transition from one to the other. For the present problem, then, assume that the perturbation was turned on at time t = 0, and off again at time T 鈥攖his doesn鈥檛 affect the calculations, but it allows for a more sensible interpretation of the result.

ca=-ihHabeigtcb,cb=-ihHbaeigtca 鈥(9.13).

Prove the commutation relation in Equation 9.74. Hint: First show that

[L2,z]=2ih(xLy-yLx-ihz)

Use this, and the fact that localid="1657963185161" r.L=r.(rp)=0, to demonstrate that

[L2,[L2,z]]=2h2(zL2+L2z)

The generalization from z to r is trivial.

Suppose you don鈥檛 assumeH'aa=H'aa=0

(a) Findca(t)andcb(t)in first-order perturbation theory, for the case

ce(0)=1,cb(0)=0.show that |ca(1)(t)|2+|cb(1)(t)|2=1, to first order inH^' .

(b) There is a nicer way to handle this problem. Let

daeih0tHaac(tc)dtc0ca,dbei20tHbbc(tc)dtc0cb.

Show that

role="math" localid="1658561855290" d-a=-iheiH'abe-i0tdb;db-=-iheiH'bae-i0tda

where

(t)1h0l[H'aa(t')-H'bb(t')]dt'.

So the equations fordaanddbare identical in structure to Equation 11.17 (with an extra role="math" localid="1658562498216" eitackedontoH^')

ca-=-ihH'abe-i0tcb,cb-=-ihH'baei0tca

(c) Use the method in part (b) to obtainrole="math" localid="1658562468835" ca(t)andcb(t)in first-order
perturbation theory, and compare your answer to (a). Comment on any discrepancies.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.