/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q13P a) Hund鈥檚 first rule says that... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

a) Hund鈥檚 first rule says that, consistent with the Pauli principle, the state with the highest total spin (S) will have the lowest energy. What would this predict in the case of the excited states of helium?

(b) Hund鈥檚 second rule says that, for a given spin, the state with the highest total orbital angular momentum (L) , consistent with overall antisymmetrization, will have the lowest energy. Why doesn鈥檛 carbon haveL=2? Note that the 鈥渢op of the ladder鈥(ML=L)is symmetric.

(c) Hund鈥檚 third rule says that if a subshell(n,l)is no more than half filled,
then the lowest energy level hasJ=lL-SI; if it is more than half filled, thenJ=L+Shas the lowest energy. Use this to resolve the boron ambiguity inProblem 5.12(b).

(d) Use Hund鈥檚 rules, together with the fact that a symmetric spin state must go with an antisymmetric position state (and vice versa) to resolve the carbon and nitrogen ambiguities in Problem 5.12(b). Hint: Always go to the 鈥渢op of the ladder鈥 to figure out the symmetry of a state.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)Ortho helium should have lower energy than para helium, for corresponding states (which is true).

(b) Hund鈥檚 first rule says S = 1 for the ground state of carbon. But this (the triplet) is symmetric, so the orbital state will have to be anti symmetric.

(c)For boron there is only one electron in the 2p sub shell (which can accommodate a total of 6), so Hund鈥檚 third rule says the ground state will haveJ=|L-S|

(d)For carbon we know that S = 1 and L = 1, and there are only two electrons in the outer sub shell, so Hund鈥檚 third rule says J = 0, and the ground state configuration must beP03.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Hund’s first rule

Orthohelium should have lower energy than parahelium, for corresponding states

(which is true).

02

(b) Hund’s second rule

Hund鈥檚 first rule says S = 1 for the ground state of carbon. But this (the triplet) is symmetric, so the orbital state will have to be antisymmetric. Hund鈥檚 second rule favors L = 2, but this is symmetric, as you can see most easily by going to the top of the ladder. |22>=|11>1|11>2So the ground state of carbon will be S = 1,L = 1. This leaves three possibilities:P2,3P1,3andP0,3

03

(c) Hund’s third rule

For boron there is only one electron in the 2p subshell (which can accommodate a total

of 6), so Hund鈥檚 third rule says the ground state will have J=|L-S|. We found in

Problem 5.12(b) thatL=1andS=1/2,soJ=1/2, and the configuration isP1/22

04

(d) using Hund’s rules

For carbon we know that S = 1 and L = 1, and there are only two electrons in the outer

subshell, so Hund鈥檚 third rule says J = 0, and the ground state configuration must beP03.

For nitrogen Hund鈥檚 first rule says S = 3/2, which is symmetric (the top of the ladder is

3232>=1212>11212>21212>3)..

Hund鈥檚 second rule favors L = 3, but this is also symmetric. In fact, the only antisymmetric

orbital configuration here is L = 0. [You can check this directly by working out the

ClebschGordan- co-effcients, but it鈥檚 easier to reason as follows: Suppose the three

outer electrons are in the \top of the ladder鈥 spin state, so each one has spin up 1212>;

then (since the spin states are all the same) the orbital states have to be different:|11>,|10>,and|1-1> .

In particular, the total z-component of orbital angular momentum has to be zero.

But the only configuration that restricts LztozeroisL=0.]The outer subshell is exactly half filled

(three electrons with n = 2, l = 1), so Hund鈥檚 third rule

says J=|L-S|=0-32=3/2Conclusion: The groundstate of nitrogen isS3/24

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Find the chemical potential and the total energy for distinguishable particles in the three dimensional harmonic oscillator potential (Problem 4.38). Hint: The sums in Equations5.785.78and5.795.79can be evaluated exactly, in this case鈭掆垝no need to use an integral approximation, as we did for the infinite square well. Note that by differentiating the geometric series,

11-x=n=0xn

You can get

ddx(x1-x)=n=1(n+1)xn

and similar results for higher derivatives.

(b)Discuss the limiting caserole="math" localid="1658400905376" kBTh.
(c) Discuss the classical limit,role="math" localid="1658400915894" kBTh, in the light of the equipartition theorem. How many degrees of freedom does a particle in the three dimensional harmonic oscillator possess?

Imagine two non interacting particles, each of mass , in the one dimensional harmonic oscillator potential (Equation 2.43). If one is in the ground state, and the other is in the first excited state, calculate (x1-x2)2assuming
(a) they are distinguishable particles, (b) they are identical bosons, and (c) they are identical fermions. Ignore spin (if this bothers you, just assume they are both in the same spin state.)

Suppose you had three (noninteracting) particles, in thermal equilibrium in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential, with a total energyE=92h .

(a) If they are distinguishable particles (but all with the same mass), what are the possible occupation-number configurations, and how many distinct (threeparticle) states are there for each one? What is the most probable configuration? If you picked a particle at random and measured its energy, what values might you get, and what is the probability of each one? What is the most probable energy?

(b) Do the same for the case of identical fermions (ignoring spin, as we did in Section 5.4.1).

(c) Do the same for the case of identical bosons (ignoring spin).

Suppose you had three particles, one in statea(x), one in stateb(x), and one in statec(x). Assuming a,b, andc are orthonormal, construct the three-particle states (analogous to Equations 5.15,5.16, and 5.17) representing

(a) distinguishable particles,

(b) identical bosons, and

(c) identical fermions.

Keep in mind that (b) must be completely symmetric, under interchange of any pair of particles, and (c) must be completely antisymmetric, in the same sense. Comment: There's a cute trick for constructing completely antisymmetric wave functions: Form the Slater determinant, whose first row isa(x1),b(x1),c(x1) , etc., whese second row isa(x2),b(x2),c(x2) , etc., and so on (this device works for any number of particles).

Calculate the Fermi energy for noninteracting electrons in a two-dimensional infinite square well. Let 蟽 be the number of free electrons per unit area.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.