/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 7.26 In this problem you will model h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In this problem you will model helium-3 as a non-interacting Fermi gas. Although He3liquefies at low temperatures, the liquid has an unusually low density and behaves in many ways like a gas because the forces between the atoms are so weak. Helium-3 atoms are spin-1/2 fermions, because of the unpaired neutron in the nucleus.

(a) Pretending that liquid 3He is a non-interacting Fermi gas, calculate the Fermi energy and the Fermi temperature. The molar volume (at low pressures) is 37cm3

(b)Calculate the heat capacity for T<<Tf, and compare to the experimental result CV=(2.8K-1)NkT(in the low-temperature limit). (Don't expect perfect agreement.)

(c)The entropy of solid H3ebelow 1 K is almost entirely due to its multiplicity of nuclear spin alignments. Sketch a graph S vs. T for liquid and solid H3eat low temperature, and estimate the temperature at which the liquid and solid have the same entropy. Discuss the shape of the solid-liquid phase boundary shown in Figure 5.13.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The Fermi energy is given byf=6.810-23Jand the Fermi temperature is found to beT=5K.

b. The heat capacity for large Fermi temperature is Cv=1K-1.

c. The temperature at which the liquid and solid have same entropy is given by,T=0.2475k.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

We have given, the He-3 a non interacting Fermi gas model.

We have to find the Fermi energy and temperature.

02

Simplify

The Fermi energy is given by consider the mass as three proton mass as Helium-3 is,

f=h28m3N蟺痴23f=(6.6310-34J.s)28(31.6710-27kg)3(6.021023)(3710-6m323f=6.810-23J

Then the Fermi temperature is

T=fKBT=6.810-23J1.3810-23J/KT=5K

03

Part (b) Step 1: Given information

We have given,

T<<Tf

we have to calculate the heat capacity.

04

Simplify

The heat capacity is given by as in the terms of the given Fermi temperature T is,

Cv=2NkB2T2fCvNkBT=(1.34)2(1.3810-23J/K)26.810-23JCvNkBT=1.0K-1

This given capacity is greater than found capacity.

05

Part (c) Step 1: Given information

We have given,

T=1K

We have to plot the graph between the entropy S and T.

06

Simplify

The entropy of the liquid ,

S=0TCVTdTS=0T2.8NKTTdTS=2.8NKTK-1

Since,

S=NK濒苍惟

By comparing we can say,

T=ln(2)2.8T=0.2475K

here the entropy of liquid will be same for the solids also.

They are connected at one point where the entropy of the system for solid and liquid phase are same as showing in the figure.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Repeat the previous problem, taking into account the two independent spin states of the electron. Now the system has two "occupied" states, one with the electron in each spin configuration. However, the chemical potential of the electron gas is also slightly different. Show that the ratio of probabilities is the same as before: The spin degeneracy cancels out of the Saha equation.

Consider a system of five particles, inside a container where the allowed energy levels are nondegenerate and evenly spaced. For instance, the particles could be trapped in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential. In this problem you will consider the allowed states for this system, depending on whether the particles are identical fermions, identical bosons, or distinguishable particles.

(a) Describe the ground state of this system, for each of these three cases.

(b) Suppose that the system has one unit of energy (above the ground state). Describe the allowed states of the system, for each of the three cases. How many possible system states are there in each case?

(c) Repeat part (b) for two units of energy and for three units of energy.

(d) Suppose that the temperature of this system is low, so that the total energy is low (though not necessarily zero). In what way will the behavior of the bosonic system differ from that of the system of distinguishable particles? Discuss.

The argument given above for why CvTdoes not depend on the details of the energy levels available to the fermions, so it should also apply to the model considered in Problem 7.16: a gas of fermions trapped in such a way that the energy levels are evenly spaced and non-degenerate.

(a) Show that, in this model, the number of possible system states for a given value of q is equal to the number of distinct ways of writing q as a sum of positive integers. (For example, there are three system states for q = 3, corresponding to the sums 3, 2 + 1, and 1 + 1 + 1. Note that 2 + 1 and 1 + 2 are not counted separately.) This combinatorial function is called the number of unrestricted partitions of q, denoted p(q). For example, p(3) = 3.

(b) By enumerating the partitions explicitly, compute p(7) and p(8).

(c) Make a table of p(q) for values of q up to 100, by either looking up the values in a mathematical reference book, or using a software package that can compute them, or writing your own program to compute them. From this table, compute the entropy, temperature, and heat capacity of this system, using the same methods as in Section 3.3. Plot the heat capacity as a function of temperature, and note that it is approximately linear.

(d) Ramanujan and Hardy (two famous mathematicians) have shown that when q is large, the number of unrestricted partitions of q is given approximately by

p(q)e2q343q

Check the accuracy of this formula for q = 10 and for q = 100. Working in this approximation, calculate the entropy, temperature, and heat capacity of this system. Express the heat. capacity as a series in decreasing powers of kT/, assuming that this ratio is large and keeping the two largest terms. Compare to the numerical results you obtained in part (c). Why is the heat capacity of this system independent of N, unlike that of the three dimensional box of fermions discussed in the text?

A ferromagnet is a material (like iron) that magnetizes spontaneously, even in the absence of an externally applied magnetic field. This happens because each elementary dipole has a strong tendency to align parallel to its neighbors. At t=0the magnetization of a ferromagnet has the maximum possible value, with all dipoles perfectly lined up; if there are Natoms, the total magnetization is typically~2eN, where 碌a is the Bohr magneton. At somewhat higher temperatures, the excitations take the form of spin waves, which can be visualized classically as shown in Figure 7.30. Like sound waves, spin waves are quantized: Each wave mode can have only integer multiples of a basic energy unit. In analogy with phonons, we think of the energy units as particles, called magnons. Each magnon reduces the total spin of the system by one unit of h21rand therefore reduces the magnetization by ~2e. However, whereas the frequency of a sound wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength, the frequency of a spin-wave is proportional to the square of 1.. (in the limit of long wavelengths). Therefore, since=hfand p=h.. for any "particle," the energy of a magnon is proportional

In the ground state of a ferromagnet, all the elementary dipoles point in the same direction. The lowest-energy excitations above the ground state are spin waves, in which the dipoles precess in a conical motion. A long-wavelength spin wave carries very little energy because the difference in direction between neighboring dipoles is very small.

to the square of its momentum. In analogy with the energy-momentum relation for an ordinary nonrelativistic particle, we can write =p22pm*, wherem* is a constant related to the spin-spin interaction energy and the atomic spacing. For iron, m* turns out to equal 1.241029kg, about14times the mass of an electron. Another difference between magnons and phonons is that each magnon ( or spin-wave mode) has only one possible polarization.

(a) Show that at low temperatures, the number of magnons per unit volume in a three-dimensional ferromagnet is given by

NmV=22mkTh2320xex-1dx.

Evaluate the integral numerically.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find an expression for the fractional reduction in magnetization, (M(O)-M(T))/M(O).Write your answer in the form (T/To)32, and estimate the constantT0for iron.

(c) Calculate the heat capacity due to magnetic excitations in a ferromagnet at low temperature. You should find Cv/Nk=(T/Ti)32, where Tidiffers from To only by a numerical constant. EstimateTifor iron, and compare the magnon and phonon contributions to the heat capacity. (The Debye temperature of iron is 470k.)

(d) Consider a two-dimensional array of magnetic dipoles at low temperature. Assume that each elementary dipole can still point in any (threedimensional) direction, so spin waves are still possible. Show that the integral for the total number of magnons diverge in this case. (This result is an indication that there can be no spontaneous magnetization in such a two-dimensional system. However, in Section 8.2we will consider a different two-dimensional model in which magnetization does occur.)

A white dwarf star (see Figure 7.12) is essentially a degenerate electron gas, with a bunch of nuclei mixed in to balance the charge and to provide the gravitational attraction that holds the star together. In this problem you will derive a relation between the mass and the radius of a white dwarf star, modeling the star as a uniform-density sphere. White dwarf stars tend to be extremely hot by our standards; nevertheless, it is an excellent approximation in this problem to set T=0.

(a) Use dimensional analysis to argue that the gravitational potential energy of a uniform-density sphere (mass M, radius R) must equal

Ugrav=-(constant)GM2R

where (constant) is some numerical constant. Be sure to explain the minus sign. The constant turns out to equal 3/5; you can derive it by calculating the (negative) work needed to assemble the sphere, shell by shell, from the inside out.

(b) Assuming that the star contains one proton and one neutron for each electron, and that the electrons are nonrelativistic, show that the total (kinetic) energy of the degenerate electrons equals

Ukinetic=(0.0086)h2M53memp53R2

Figure 7.12. The double star system Sirius A and B. Sirius A (greatly overexposed in the photo) is the brightest star in our night sky. Its companion, Sirius B, is hotter but very faint, indicating that it must be extremely small-a white dwarf. From the orbital motion of the pair we know that Sirius B has about the same mass as our sun. (UCO /Lick Observatory photo.)

( c) The equilibrium radius of the white dwarf is that which minimizes the total energy Ugravity+Ukinetic路 Sketch the total energy as a function of R, and find a formula for the equilibrium radius in terms of the mass. As the mass increases, does the radius increase or decrease? Does this make sense?

( d) Evaluate the equilibrium radius for M=21030kg, the mass of the sun. Also evaluate the density. How does the density compare to that of water?

( e) Calculate the Fermi energy and the Fermi temperature, for the case considered in part (d). Discuss whether the approximation T = 0 is valid.

(f) Suppose instead that the electrons in the white dwarf star are highly relativistic. Using the result of the previous problem, show that the total kinetic energy of the electrons is now proportional to 1 / R instead of 1R2鈥 Argue that there is no stable equilibrium radius for such a star.

(g) The transition from the nonrelativistic regime to the ultra relativistic regime occurs approximately where the average kinetic energy of an electron is equal to its rest energy, mc2Is the nonrelativistic approximation valid for a one-solar-mass white dwarf? Above what mass would you expect a white dwarf to become relativistic and hence unstable?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.