/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Jerry tested 30 laptop computers... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Jerry tested 30 laptop computers owned by classmates enrolled in a large computer science class and discovered that 22 were infected with keystroke- tracking spyware. Is it appropriate for Jerry to use his data to estimate the proportion of all laptops infected with such spyware? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
It might not be appropriate due to the small and potentially biased sample.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Population and Sample

To determine if Jerry's findings can be used to estimate the proportion of all laptops infected with spyware, we first need to identify the population and the sample. In this context, the population includes all laptop computers of classmates in the computer science class, while the sample is the 30 laptops tested by Jerry.
02

Consider the Sample Size

Evaluate the size of Jerry's sample relative to the overall population. Generally, a larger sample size is necessary to make reliable inferences about the population. The sample size of 30 may not be representative of a large class, especially if the class comprises hundreds of students.
03

Assess Sampling Method

Review how Jerry selected the sample; it should be random and unbiased to make valid generalizations. If Jerry selected laptops randomly, it increases the reliability of using the data to estimate the larger group's spyware infection rate. However, if the sample is biased or not random, it likely will not accurately represent the population.
04

Evaluate the Uniformity of Factors

Consider whether any confounding variables might affect the infection rate. For example, different usage habits or security practices among students could affect the likelihood of infection. If these factors aren't uniform across the class, it might impact the reliability of estimating the entire class's infection rate with Jerry's sample.
05

Conclusion on Appropriateness

After evaluating the sample size, randomness, and potential confounding variables, determine if the data can yield an appropriate estimate for the class's infection rate. If the sample was random and the size is sufficiently large, it may be appropriate; otherwise, it might not be accurate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population and Sample
Understanding the concepts of population and sample is crucial in statistical inference. The population refers to the entire group of interest that we want to learn about. In Jerry's situation, this group would be all the laptops owned by his classmates in the computer science class. On the other hand, the sample is a smaller, manageable portion of the population that is actually examined to make conclusions about the whole group. Jerry tested 30 laptops, making this his sample.
When working with statistics, it's important that the sample reflects the population effectively. Essentially, what this means is that the sample should bear the characteristics of the entire group for accurate inference. In this scenario, the accuracy of Jerry's findings heavily depends on how well those 30 laptops reflect the rest of the class's laptops in terms of being infected by spyware.
  • Population: All student laptops in the computer science class.
  • Sample: 30 randomly chosen laptops tested by Jerry.
Identifying the right population and choosing a representative sample is the first and foundational step in making valid predictions and insights about any larger group.
Sample Size
The concept of sample size is another fundamental aspect in statistics. Sample size refers to the number of observations or data points collected from the population. In Jerry's study, the sample size is 30 laptops. The size of a sample is crucial because it impacts the reliability of the statistical inference.
In general, larger sample sizes tend to produce results that more closely align with the truth about the population. This happens because larger samples tend to cover more variety and reduce the impact of outliers and variations. Jerry's sample size of 30 may seem adequate in some situations, but it might not be sufficiently large for a class that consists of hundreds of students. Larger sample sizes help to ensure that the sample is more representative and that the findings are more likely to be generalized accurately to the population.
In conclusion, while bigger isn't always better, in statistics, having a sufficiently large sample size helps improve confidence in results and ensures that we capture a fair representation of the population.
Sampling Method
The sampling method defines how samples are chosen. For accurate statistical inference, the sampling method should ideally be random, allowing each member of the population an equal chance to be selected. In Jerry's case, we need to know how he picked those 30 laptops.
Using a random sampling method avoids bias and ensures that the sample reflects the population truly. However, if Jerry chose his laptops based on convenience (for instance, just asking people sitting nearby), his sampling might not accurately represent the entire population.
  • Random sampling: Ensures that every laptop has an equal probability of being selected, making the sample unbiased.
  • Non-random sampling: Could potentially skew results, leading to inaccurate estimations of the larger population.
Ensuring a proper sampling method helps bridge the gap between sample findings and true population characteristics.
Confounding Variables
In statistical studies, confounding variables are factors other than the one being studied that might affect the results. Addressing these variables is critical when making inferences, as they can skew the findings if not accounted for correctly.
In the scenario with Jerry, various student habits and conditions could be confounding variables. For example, one group of students might frequently download unknown files or use public Wi-Fi, increasing their exposure to spyware. In contrast, another group might have stronger cybersecurity practices, thereby lowering their risk. Such differences can lead to inaccurate results about the spyware infection rate if they aren't considered in the analysis.
Recognizing and controlling for potential confounding variables allow researchers to discern the real effects of the variable of interest. While difficult, attempts to equalize or account for these variables can significantly strengthen the reliability of conclusions drawn from studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Isabel Myers was a pioneer in the study of personality types. She identified four basic personality preferences, which are described at length in the book \(A\) Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator by Myers and McCaulley (Consulting Psychologists Press). Marriage counselors know that couples who have none of the four preferences in common may have a stormy marriage. Myers took a random sample of 375 married couples and found that 289 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 571 married couples, it was found that only 23 had no preferences in common. Let \(p_{1}\) be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let \(p_{2}\) be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. (a) Can a normal distribution be used to approximate the \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) distribution? Explain. (b) Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) (c) Explain the meaning of the confidence interval in part (a) in the context of this problem. Does the confidence interval contain all positive, all negative, or both positive and negative numbers? What does this tell you (at the \(99 \%\) confidence level) about the proportion of married couples with two or more personality preferences in common compared with the proportion of married couples sharing no personality preferences in common?

If a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference of means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) contains all positive values, what can we conclude about the relationship between \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) at the \(90 \%\) confidence level?

A random sample of 5792 physicians in Colorado showed that 3139 provide at least some charity care (i.c., treat poor people at no cost). These data are based on information from State Health Care Data: Utilization, Spending, and Characteristics (American Medical Association). (a) Let \(p\) represent the proportion of all Colorado physicians who provide some charity care. Find a point estimate for \(p\). (b) Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(p\). Give a brief explanation of the meaning of your answer in the context of this problem. (c) Is the normal approximation to the binomial justified in this problem? Explain.

Answer true or false. Explain your answer. A larger sample size produces a longer confidence interval for \(\mu\).

Allen's hummingbird (Selasphorus sasin) has been studied by zoologist Bill Alther (Reference: Hummingbinds by K. Long and W. Alther). A small group of 15 Allen's hummingbirds has been under study in Arizona. The average weight for these birds is \(\bar{x}=3.15\) grams. Based on previous studies, we can assume that the weights of Allen's hummingbirds have a normal distribution, with \(\sigma=0.33\) gram. (a) Find an \(80 \%\) confidence interval for the average weights of Allen's hummingbirds in the study region. What is the margin of error? (b) What conditions are necessary for your calculations? (c) Interpret your results in the context of this problem. (d) Sample Size Find the sample size necessary for an \(80 \%\) confidence level with a maximal margin of error \(E=0.08\) for the mean weights of the hummingbirds.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.