/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 A random sample of leading compa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A random sample of leading companies in South Korea gave the following percentage yields based on assets (see reference in Problem 7): \(\begin{array}{lllllll}2.5 & 2.0 & 4.5 & 1.8 & 0.5 & 3.6 & 2.4\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllll}0.2 & 1.7 & 1.8 & 1.4 & 5.4 & 1.1\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2}=2.247\) for these South Korean companies. Another random sample of leading companies in Sweden gave the following percentage yields based on assets: \(\begin{array}{lllllllll}2.3 & 3.2 & 3.6 & 1.2 & 3.6 & 2.8 & 2.3 & 3.5 & 2.8\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2}=0.624\) for these Swedish companies. Test the claim that the population variance of percentage yields on assets for South Korean companies is higher than that for companies in Sweden. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to an economist's question regarding volatility of corporate productivity of large companies in South Korea compared with that in Sweden?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The variance in percentage yields for South Korean companies is higher, suggesting higher volatility compared to Swedish companies.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

We are tasked with testing if the variance of percentage yields for South Korean companies is higher than that for Swedish companies. Thus, we set up our null hypothesis as \( H_0: \sigma^2_1 \leq \sigma^2_2 \) and the alternative hypothesis as \( H_a: \sigma^2_1 > \sigma^2_2 \), where \( \sigma_1^2 \) and \( \sigma_2^2 \) are the population variances for South Korea and Sweden, respectively.
02

Identify the Test Statistic

We will use the F-test for comparing two variances. The test statistic is given by \( F = \frac{s^2_1}{s^2_2} \), where \( s^2_1 = 2.247 \) and \( s^2_2 = 0.624 \) are the sample variances for South Korea and Sweden, respectively.
03

Calculate the Test Statistic

Substitute the values of the variances into the formula: \[ F = \frac{2.247}{0.624} \approx 3.601 \].
04

Determine the Critical Value

The degrees of freedom for South Korea's sample is \( n_1 - 1 = 12 - 1 = 11 \) and for Sweden's sample is \( n_2 - 1 = 9 - 1 = 8 \). Using an F-distribution table and a 5% level of significance for a one-tailed test with these degrees of freedom, the critical value \( F_{\text{critical}} \approx 3.326 \).
05

Compare Test Statistic to Critical Value

Our calculated \( F \approx 3.601 \) exceeds the critical value \( F_{\text{critical}} \approx 3.326 \).
06

Make a Decision

Since the test statistic exceeds the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to claim that the variance in percentage yields based on assets for South Korean companies is higher than that for Swedish companies.
07

Relate to Economist's Question

This result suggests higher volatility in corporate productivity among large companies in South Korea compared to Sweden, as indicated by greater variability in percentage yields on assets.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F-test
The F-test is a statistical test used when you want to compare two variances.
It is particularly useful in determining if one population has a significantly larger variance than another.
This test involves calculating a test statistic by dividing the variance of the first sample by the variance of the second.
For example, in assessing the variance of percentage yields between South Korean and Swedish companies, the F-test statistic is calculated as \( F = \frac{s^2_1}{s^2_2} \), where \( s^2_1 \) and \( s^2_2 \) are the sample variances.
This ratio tells us how much larger one variance is compared to another. Basically, the F-test lets you check if the observed variation is larger than what could be expected by random chance.
One should select the appropriate formula and test, depending upon the structure of the problem.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in statistics that is used to make inferences about populations based on sample data.
In simple terms, it helps to determine if there is enough evidence in a sample to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population.
Initially, we set up two hypotheses: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.
  • The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) usually states that there is no effect or no difference, and it assumes the status quo.
  • The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is what we want to prove, claiming a true effect or difference.
The hypothesis test involves calculating a test statistic, comparing it to a critical value, and making a decision.
If the test statistic is beyond the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.
In the case of comparing variances, as in our example, we test if the variance of the South Korean companies' percentage yields is greater than that of the Swedish companies.
Population Variance
The concept of population variance is crucial in statistics as it measures the extent to which the values of a data set differ from the mean.
When we talk about variance, we're talking about the average of the squared differences from the mean, essentially quantifying the data's spread.
In this context, variance can indicate how much percentage yields fluctuate for different countries' companies.
  • A higher variance means the data points are more spread out from the mean, indicating higher volatility.
  • A lower variance indicates that the data points are closer to the mean, suggesting stability.
When conducting a comparative analysis like in the South Korean versus Swedish company exercise, understanding population variance helps evaluate which country exhibits more financial stability.
Critical Value
The critical value in hypothesis testing is a threshold that the test statistic must exceed to reject the null hypothesis.
This value helps in deciding whether to accept or reject our initial hypothesis.
It's derived based on the chosen level of significance, often 5%, and the degrees of freedom associated with the data.
In an F-test, the critical value is obtained from an F-distribution table and determines the boundary of acceptance.
For our example, comparing variances of South Korean and Swedish companies, the critical value is obtained for specific degrees of freedom related to the sample sizes, specifically 11 and 8.
If the test statistic exceeds this critical value, as it did at an \( F \approx 3.601 \), it indicates sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support that one variance is larger than the other.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A researcher forms three blocks of students interested in taking a history course. The groups are based on grade point average (GPA). The first group consists of students with a GPA less than \(2.5\), the second group consists of students with a GPA between \(2.5\) and \(3.1\), and the last group consists of students with a GPA greater than 3.1. History courses are taught in three ways: traditional lecture, small-group collaborative method, and independent study. The researcher randomly assigns 10 students from each block to sections of history taught each of the three ways. Sections for each teaching style then have 10 students from each block. The researcher records the scores on a common course final examination administered to each student. Draw a flow chart showing the design of this experiment. Does the design fit the model for randomized block design?

A pathologist has been studying the frequency of bacterial colonies within the field of a microscope using samples of throat cultures from healthy adults. Long-term history indicates that there is an average of \(2.80\) bacteria colonies per field. Let \(r\) be a random variable that represents the number of bacteria colonies per field. Let \(O\) represent the number of observed bacteria colonies per field for throat cultures from healthy adults. A random sample of 100 healthy adults gave the following information. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \hline \boldsymbol{r} & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \text { or more } \\ \hline 0 & 12 & 15 & 29 & 18 & 19 & 7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) The pathologist wants to use a Poisson distribution to represent the probability of \(r\), the number of bacteria colonies per field. The Poisson distribution is $$ P(r)=\frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^{r}}{r !} $$ where \(\lambda=2.80\) is the average number of bacteria colonies per field. Compute \(P(r)\) for \(r=0,1,2,3,4\), and 5 or more. (b) Compute the expected number of colonies \(E=100 P(r)\) for \(r=0,1,2,3,4\) and 5 or more. (c) Compute the sample statistic \(\chi^{2}=\Sigma \frac{(O-E)^{2}}{E}\) and the degrees of freedom. (d) Test the statement that the Poisson distribution fits the sample data. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance.

A new kind of typhoid shot is being developed by a medical research team. The old typhoid shot was known to protect the population for a mean time of 36 months, with a standard deviation of 3 months. To test the time variability of the new shot, a random sample of 23 people were given the new shot. Regular blood tests showed that the sample standard deviation of protection times was \(1.9\) months. Using a \(0.05\) level of significance, test the claim that the new typhoid shot has a smaller variance of protection times. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population standard deviation.

For chi-square distributions, as the number of degrees of freedom increases, does any skewness increase or decrease? Do chi-square distributions become more symmetric (and normal) as the number of degrees of freedom becomes larger and larger?

A new thermostat has been engineered for the frozen food cases in large supermarkets. Both the old and the new thermostats hold temperatures at an average of \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). However, it is hoped that the new thermostat might be more dependable in the sense that it will hold temperatures closer to \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). One frozen food case was equipped with the new thermostat, and a random sample of 21 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(5.1 .\) Another, similar frozen food case was equipped with the old thermostat, and a random sample of 16 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(12.8 .\) Test the claim that the population variance of the old thermostat temperature readings is larger than that for the new thermostat. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to the question regarding the dependability of the temperature readings?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.