/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 A pathologist has been studying ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A pathologist has been studying the frequency of bacterial colonies within the field of a microscope using samples of throat cultures from healthy adults. Long-term history indicates that there is an average of \(2.80\) bacteria colonies per field. Let \(r\) be a random variable that represents the number of bacteria colonies per field. Let \(O\) represent the number of observed bacteria colonies per field for throat cultures from healthy adults. A random sample of 100 healthy adults gave the following information. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \hline \boldsymbol{r} & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \text { or more } \\ \hline 0 & 12 & 15 & 29 & 18 & 19 & 7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) The pathologist wants to use a Poisson distribution to represent the probability of \(r\), the number of bacteria colonies per field. The Poisson distribution is $$ P(r)=\frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^{r}}{r !} $$ where \(\lambda=2.80\) is the average number of bacteria colonies per field. Compute \(P(r)\) for \(r=0,1,2,3,4\), and 5 or more. (b) Compute the expected number of colonies \(E=100 P(r)\) for \(r=0,1,2,3,4\) and 5 or more. (c) Compute the sample statistic \(\chi^{2}=\Sigma \frac{(O-E)^{2}}{E}\) and the degrees of freedom. (d) Test the statement that the Poisson distribution fits the sample data. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The chi-square test indicates the Poisson distribution does not fit the sample data at a 5% significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Poisson Probability for r = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

The Poisson probability formula is given by: \[ P(r) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^{r}}{r!} \] where \( \lambda = 2.8 \). We calculate for each value of \( r \):- \( r = 0 \), \( P(0) = \frac{e^{-2.8} 2.8^{0}}{0!} = e^{-2.8} \approx 0.0608 \)- \( r = 1 \), \( P(1) = \frac{e^{-2.8} 2.8^{1}}{1!} = 2.8 \times e^{-2.8} \approx 0.1703 \)- \( r = 2 \), \( P(2) = \frac{e^{-2.8} 2.8^{2}}{2!} = \frac{2.8^2}{2} \times e^{-2.8} \approx 0.2384 \)- \( r = 3 \), \( P(3) = \frac{e^{-2.8} 2.8^{3}}{3!} = \frac{2.8^3}{6} \times e^{-2.8} \approx 0.2223 \)- \( r = 4 \), \( P(4) = \frac{e^{-2.8} 2.8^{4}}{4!} = \frac{2.8^4}{24} \times e^{-2.8} \approx 0.1556 \)- \( r \geq 5 \), calculate the cumulative probability \( P(5) = 1 - (P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4)) \approx 0.1526 \) after summation and subtraction.
02

Compute Expected Number of Colonies (E)

For each \( r \), multiply the probability \( P(r) \) by the sample size (100) to find the expected number of observations:- \( E(0) = 100 \times 0.0608 \approx 6.08 \)- \( E(1) = 100 \times 0.1703 \approx 17.03 \)- \( E(2) = 100 \times 0.2384 \approx 23.84 \)- \( E(3) = 100 \times 0.2223 \approx 22.23 \)- \( E(4) = 100 \times 0.1556 \approx 15.56 \)- \( E(5) = 100 \times 0.1526 \approx 15.26 \) (for 5 or more colonies)
03

Calculate Chi-Square Statistic

Use the chi-square formula \[ \chi^{2} = \sum \frac{(O - E)^{2}}{E} \] to calculate the statistic:- For \( r = 0 \), \( \frac{(12 - 6.08)^{2}}{6.08} \approx 5.712 \)- For \( r = 1 \), \( \frac{(15 - 17.03)^{2}}{17.03} \approx 0.242 \)- For \( r = 2 \), \( \frac{(29 - 23.84)^{2}}{23.84} \approx 1.071 \)- For \( r = 3 \), \( \frac{(18 - 22.23)^{2}}{22.23} \approx 0.805 \)- For \( r = 4 \), \( \frac{(19 - 15.56)^{2}}{15.56} \approx 0.757 \)- For \( r = 5 \), \( \frac{(7 - 15.26)^{2}}{15.26} \approx 4.478 \)Summing these values, \( \chi^{2} \approx 13.065 \).
04

Determine Degrees of Freedom and Test Statistic

The degrees of freedom (df) is calculated as \( k - 1 - m \), where \( k \) is the number of categories (6 in this case, including combined 5 or more), and \( m \) is the number of parameters estimated (1 in this case, \( \lambda \)). Thus, \( df = 6 - 1 - 1 = 4 \).Using a chi-square distribution table, find the critical value for \( df = 4 \) at a 5% significance level, which is approximately \( 9.488 \). Since \( \chi^{2} = 13.065 \) is greater than \( 9.488 \), we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Test
The Chi-Square Test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the expected frequencies and the observed frequencies in one or more categories. This is particularly useful for categorical data and helps verify if a specific distribution, such as the Poisson distribution, fits the observed data properly. To perform a Chi-Square Test, follow these general steps:
  • Calculate Expected Frequencies: These are derived from the hypothesized distribution. In our case, use the Poisson distribution probabilities multiplied by the sample size.
  • Compute the Chi-Square Statistic: Use the formula \( \chi^{2} = \sum \frac{(O - E)^{2}}{E} \), where \( O \) is the observed frequency, and \( E \) is the expected frequency for each category. The sum is over all categories.
  • Compare to Critical Value: Use a Chi-Square distribution table to find the critical value at the desired significance level and degrees of freedom to assess significance.
By comparing the calculated Chi-Square statistic to this critical value, you can conclude whether to reject or accept your null hypothesis.
Probability
Probability is a fundamental concept in statistics that quantifies the likelihood of an event occurring. It ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 means the event will not happen and 1 indicates certainty that the event will happen. In the context of the Poisson distribution used in our exercise:
  • Poisson Probability describes the probability of a given number of events happening in a fixed interval of time or space. It is particularly useful for events that occur independently at a constant rate.
  • The Poisson probability formula is stated as \( P(r) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^{r}}{r!} \), where \( \lambda \) is the average number of occurrences in the interval, and \( r \) denotes the number of occurrences you want to find the probability for. \( e \) is the base of the natural logarithm, approximately equal to 2.718.
What's special about a Poisson distribution is that its mean is also equal to its variance, providing a unique characteristic that fits specific distributions of data quite efficiently.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) are the number of independent values in a calculation, which can vary within a statistical analysis. It is an essential concept in statistical testing, including the Chi-Square Test, as it influences the shape of the distribution curve used for hypothesis testing.
  • Formula for Degrees of Freedom in Chi-Square: Calculate \( df \) as \( k - 1 - m \), where \( k \) is the number of categories and \( m \) is the number of parameters estimated. In the example exercise, this results in \( df = 6 - 1 - 1 = 4 \).
  • Role in Critical Value: Degrees of freedom are used to locate the critical value on the Chi-Square distribution table, essential for determining the threshold at which we can reject the null hypothesis.
  • Conceptual Role: A higher degrees of freedom usually indicates greater flexibility in the statistical model, which can potentially handle larger data variability.
Understanding degrees of freedom helps in making informed decisions about the validity of statistical analyses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A gambler complained about the dice. They seemed to be loaded! The dice were taken off the table and tested one at a time. One die was rolled 300 times and the following frequencies were recorded. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \hline \text { Outcome } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\ \hline \text { Observed frequency } O & 62 & 45 & 63 & 32 & 47 & 51 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do these data indicate that the die is unbalanced? Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance. Hint: If the die is balanced, all outcomes should have the same expected frequency.

A new thermostat has been engineered for the frozen food cases in large supermarkets. Both the old and the new thermostats hold temperatures at an average of \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). However, it is hoped that the new thermostat might be more dependable in the sense that it will hold temperatures closer to \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). One frozen food case was equipped with the new thermostat, and a random sample of 21 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(5.1 .\) Another, similar frozen food case was equipped with the old thermostat, and a random sample of 16 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(12.8 .\) Test the claim that the population variance of the old thermostat temperature readings is larger than that for the new thermostat. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to the question regarding the dependability of the temperature readings?

The quantity of dissolved oxygen is a measure of water pollution in lakes, rivers, and streams. Water samples were taken at four different locations in a river in an effort to determine if water pollution varied from location to location. Location I was 500 meters above an industrial plant water discharge point and near the shore. Location II was 200 meters above the discharge point and in midstream. Location III was 50 meters downstream from the discharge point and near the shore. Location IV was 200 meters downstream from the discharge point and in midstream. The following table shows the results. Lower dissolved oxygen readings mean more pollution. Because of the difficulty in getting midstream samples, ecology students collecting the data had fewer of these samples. Use an \(\alpha=0.05\) level of significance. Do we reject or not reject the claim that the quantity of dissolved oxygen does not vary from one location to another? $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Location I } & \text { Location II } & \text { Location III } & \text { Location IV } \\ 7.3 & 6.6 & 4.2 & 4.4 \\ 6.9 & 7.1 & 5.9 & 5.1 \\ 7.5 & 7.7 & 4.9 & 6.2 \\ 6.8 & 8.0 & 5.1 & \\ 6.2 & & 4.5 & \end{array} $$

When using the \(F\) distribution to test two variances, is it essential that each of the two populations be normally distributed? Would it be all right if the populations had distributions that were mound-shaped and more or less symmetrical?

Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station (see reference in Problem 5 ) were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows: \(\begin{array}{llllll}6.17 & 6.05 & 5.89 & 5.94 & 7.31 & 7.18\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lllll}7.06 & 5.79 & 6.24 & 5.91 & 6.14\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that, for the preceding data, \(s^{2} \approx 0.318\). Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat straw production (in pounds): \(\begin{array}{llllllll}6.85 & 7.71 & 8.23 & 6.01 & 7.22 & 5.58 & 5.47 & 5.86\end{array}\) Use a calculator to verify that, for these data, \(s^{2}=1.078\). Test the claim that there is a difference (either way) in the population variance of wheat straw production for these two plots. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.