/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 A civil engineer has been studyi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A civil engineer has been studying the frequency of vehicle accidents on a certain stretch of interstate highway. Longterm history indicates that there has been an average of \(1.72\) accidents per day on this section of the interstate. Let \(r\) be a random variable that represents number of accidents per day. Let \(O\) represent the number of observed accidents per day based on local highway patrol reports. A random sample of 90 days gave the following information. $$ \begin{array}{r|rrrrr} \hline \boldsymbol{r} & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \text { or more } \\ \hline 0 & 22 & 21 & 15 & 17 & 15 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) The civil engineer wants to use a Poisson distribution to represent the probability of \(r\), the number of accidents per day. The Poisson distribution is $$ P(r)=\frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^{r}}{r !} $$ where \(\lambda=1.72\) is the average number of accidents per day. Compute \(P(r)\) for \(r=0,1,2,3\), and 4 or more. (b) Compute the expected number of accidents \(E=90 P(r)\) for \(r=0,1,2,3\), and 4 or more. (c) Compute the sample statistic \(\chi^{2}=\Sigma \frac{(O-E)^{2}}{E}\) and the degrees of freedom. (d) Test the statement that the Poisson distribution fits the sample data. Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Poisson distribution fits the sample data at a 1% level of significance.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Poisson Probabilities

The Poisson distribution is given by \( P(r) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^r}{r!} \) where \( \lambda = 1.72 \). Let's compute \( P(r) \) for \( r = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 \). - For \( r = 0 \): \[ P(0) = \frac{e^{-1.72} \cdot 1.72^0}{0!} = e^{-1.72} \approx 0.1791 \]- For \( r = 1 \): \[ P(1) = \frac{e^{-1.72} \cdot 1.72^1}{1!} = 1.72 \cdot e^{-1.72} \approx 0.3081 \]- For \( r = 2 \): \[ P(2) = \frac{e^{-1.72} \cdot 1.72^2}{2!} = \frac{1.72^2}{2} \cdot e^{-1.72} \approx 0.2650 \]- For \( r = 3 \): \[ P(3) = \frac{e^{-1.72} \cdot 1.72^3}{3!} = \frac{1.72^3}{6} \cdot e^{-1.72} \approx 0.1518 \]- For \( r = 4 \text{ or more} \): \[ P(\geq 4) = 1 - (P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3)) \approx 0.0960 \]
02

Calculate Expected Number of Accidents

Use the probabilities from Step 1 to compute the expected number of days, \( E = 90 \times P(r) \), for \( r = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 \text{ or more} \).- \( E(0) = 90 \times 0.1791 \approx 16.12 \)- \( E(1) = 90 \times 0.3081 \approx 27.73 \)- \( E(2) = 90 \times 0.2650 \approx 23.85 \)- \( E(3) = 90 \times 0.1518 \approx 13.66 \)- \( E(\geq 4) = 90 \times 0.0960 \approx 8.64 \)
03

Compute Chi-Squared Statistic

To calculate \( \chi^2 = \Sigma \frac{(O - E)^2}{E} \), we use the observed \( O \) and expected \( E \) values from the previous steps.- For \( r = 0 \): \( \frac{(22 - 16.12)^2}{16.12} \approx 2.141 \)- For \( r = 1 \): \( \frac{(21 - 27.73)^2}{27.73} \approx 1.635 \)- For \( r = 2 \): \( \frac{(15 - 23.85)^2}{23.85} \approx 3.289 \)- For \( r = 3 \): \( \frac{(17 - 13.66)^2}{13.66} \approx 0.798 \)- For \( r = 4 \text{ or more} \): \( \frac{(15 - 8.64)^2}{8.64} \approx 4.673 \)Summing all these gives \( \chi^2 \approx 12.536 \).
04

Determine Degrees of Freedom and Test of Significance

The degrees of freedom \( df = \text{number of categories} - 1 = 5 - 1 = 4 \). With \( \alpha = 0.01 \), the critical value for \( \chi^2 \) with 4 degrees of freedom is approximately 13.28.Since our calculated \( \chi^2 = 12.536 \) is less than 13.28, we do not reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Squared Test
The Chi-Squared test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies under a specific hypothesis. It is particularly useful for categorical data and assessing how well a theoretical distribution fits observed data points.

When applying the Chi-Squared test, follow these main steps:
  • Calculate the expected frequencies for each category. This is usually done by applying the theoretical distribution to determine what would be expected under a true hypothesis.
  • Determine the observed frequencies, which are typically collected from your sample data.
  • Use the Chi-Squared formula: \[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O - E)^2}{E}\]Where \( O \) is the observed frequency and \( E \) is the expected frequency.
  • Compare the calculated Chi-Squared value with the critical value from the Chi-Squared distribution table.

This test helps in validating the assumption about the distribution of data and is widely used in fields like biology, social sciences, and engineering.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom essentially refer to the number of values in a calculation that are free to vary. This is critical in statistics because it influences the shape of the Chi-Squared distribution.

For a Chi-Squared test, the degrees of freedom are determined by:
  • Subtracting one from the number of categories.
  • In the context of a contingency table, it can also be calculated as: (number of rows - 1) × (number of columns - 1).

In the given exercise, since there are 5 categories of accident frequencies (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or more), we calculate the degrees of freedom using:

\[df = k - 1 = 5 - 1 = 4\]
This concept helps to understand how spread out the data is and how much variability there is in the data that doesn’t lead to increased constraints.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), is a measure used to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis in a hypothesis test. It represents the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis.

The significance level is usually set at common values like 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10:
  • A 0.05 significance level indicates a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists, even when there is no actual difference.
  • A 0.01 significance level, as used in the original exercise, is more stringent, indicating a 1% risk.

In hypothesis testing, the significance level is used to compare against the \( p \)-value or the critical value from the test statistic to make a decision. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value or if the \( p \)-value is less than \( \alpha \), the null hypothesis is rejected.

Choosing an appropriate significance level depends on the field of study and the potential consequences of making errors in testing hypotheses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In general, are chi-square distributions symmetric or skewed? If skewed, are they skewed right or left?

In general, how do the hypotheses for chi-square tests of independence differ from those for chi-square tests of homogeneity? Explain.

For chi-square distributions, as the number of degrees of freedom increases, does any skewness increase or decrease? Do chi-square distributions become more symmetric (and normal) as the number of degrees of freedom becomes larger and larger?

For the study regarding mean cadence (see Problem 1), two-way ANOVA was used. Recall that the two factors were walking device (none, standard walker, rolling walker) and dual task (being required to respond vocally to a signal or no dual task required). Results of two-way ANOVA showed that there was no evidence of interaction between the factors. However, according to the article, "The ANOVA conducted on the cadence data revealed a main effect of walking device." When the hypothesis regarding no difference in mean cadence according to which, if any, walking device was used, the sample \(F\) was \(30.94\), with \(d . f \cdot \mathrm{N}=2\) and \(d . f \cdot D=18\). Further, the \(P\) -value for the result was reported to be less than \(0.01\). From this information, what is the conclusion regarding any difference in mean cadence according to the factor "walking device used"?

A random sample of companies in electric utilities (I), financial services (II), and food processing (III) gave the following information regarding annual profits per employee (units in thousands of dollars). $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \text { I } & \text { II } & \text { III } \\ 49.1 & 55.6 & 39.0 \\ 43.4 & 25.0 & 37.3 \\ 32.9 & 41.3 & 10.8 \\ 27.8 & 29.9 & 32.5 \\ 38.3 & 39.5 & 15.8 \\ 36.1 & & 42.6 \\ 20.2 & & \end{array} $$ Shall we reject or not reject the claim that there is no difference in population mean annual profits per employee in each of the three types of companies? Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.